• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较加泰罗尼亚公立医院和私立医院的横断面研究:常规会阴切开术的做法是否正在改变?

Cross-sectional study comparing public and private hospitals in Catalonia: is the practice of routine episiotomy changing?

作者信息

Escuriet Ramón, Pueyo María J, Perez-Botella Mercedes, Espada Xavi, Salgado Isabel, Gómez Analía, Biescas Herminia, Espiga Isabel, White Joanna, Fernandez Rosa, Fusté Josep, Ortún Vicente

机构信息

Directorate-General for Health Planning and Research, Ministry of Health of the Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Mar 11;15:95. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0753-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-015-0753-z
PMID:25889079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4365515/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Spain, the Strategy for Assistance in Normal Childbirth (SANC) promoted a model of care, which respects the physiological birth process and discards unnecessary routine interventions, such as episiotomies. We evaluated the rate of episiotomy use and perineal trauma as indicators of how selective introduction of the SANC initiative has impacted childbirth outcomes in hospitals of Catalonia.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of all singleton vaginal term deliveries without instrument registered in the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) of Catalonia in 2007, 2010 and 2012. Hospitals were divided into types according to funding (public or private), and four strata were differentiated according to volume of births attended. Episiotomies and perineal injury were considered dependent variables. The relationship between qualitative variables was analysed using the chi-squared test, and Student's t-test was used for quantitative variables. Comparison of proportions was performed on the two hospital groups between 2007 and 2012 using a Z-test. Logistic regression models were used to analyse the relationship between episiotomy or severe perineal damage and maternal age, volume of births and hospital type, obtaining odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

The majority of normal singleton term deliveries were attended in public hospitals, where maternal age was lower than for women attended in private hospitals. Analysis revealed a statistically significant (P < 0.001) decreasing trend in episiotomy use in Catalonia for both hospital types. Private hospitals appeared to be associated with increased episiotomy rate in 2007 (OR = 1.099, CI: 1,057-1,142), 2010 (OR = 1.528, CI: 1,472-1,587) and 2012 (OR = 1.459, CI: 1,383-1,540), and a lower rate of severe perineal trauma in 2007 (OR = 0.164, CI: 0.095-0.283), 2010 (OR = 0.16, CI: 0.110-0.232) and 2012 (OR = 0.19, CI: 0.107-0.336). Regarding severe perineal injury, when independent variables were adjusted, maternal age ceased to have a significant correlation in 2012 (OR = 0.994, CI: 0.970-1.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Episiotomy procedures during normal singleton vaginal term deliveries in Catalonia has decreased steadily since 2007. Study results show a stable incidence trend below 1% for severe perineal trauma over the study period.

摘要

背景

在西班牙,正常分娩援助策略(SANC)推广了一种护理模式,该模式尊重自然分娩过程,摒弃了诸如会阴切开术等不必要的常规干预措施。我们评估了会阴切开术的使用比例和会阴创伤情况,以此作为SANC倡议的选择性引入对加泰罗尼亚医院分娩结局影响的指标。

方法

对2007年、2010年和2012年在加泰罗尼亚最低基本数据集(MBDS)中登记的所有无器械辅助的单胎足月阴道分娩进行横断面研究。医院根据资金来源(公立或私立)进行分类,并根据分娩量分为四个层次。会阴切开术和会阴损伤被视为因变量。使用卡方检验分析定性变量之间的关系,定量变量则使用学生t检验。采用Z检验对2007年至2012年两组医院之间的比例进行比较。使用逻辑回归模型分析会阴切开术或严重会阴损伤与产妇年龄、分娩量和医院类型之间的关系,得出比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

大多数正常单胎足月分娩在公立医院进行,公立医院产妇的年龄低于私立医院。分析显示,加泰罗尼亚两种类型医院的会阴切开术使用比例均呈具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)的下降趋势。私立医院在2007年(OR = 1.099,CI:1,057 - 1,142)、2010年(OR = 1.528,CI:1,472 - 1,587)和2012年(OR = 1.459,CI:1,383 - 1,540)的会阴切开术比例似乎较高,而在2007年(OR = 0.164,CI:0.095 - 0.283)、2010年(OR = 0.16,CI:0.110 - 0.232)和2012年(OR = 0.19,CI:0.107 - 0.336)严重会阴创伤比例较低。关于严重会阴损伤,在调整自变量后,产妇年龄在2012年不再具有显著相关性(OR = 0.994,CI:0.970 - 1.018)。

结论

自2007年以来,加泰罗尼亚正常单胎足月阴道分娩时的会阴切开术程序稳步减少。研究结果表明,在研究期间严重会阴创伤的发生率稳定在1%以下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0031/4365515/052c4cfb10d0/12913_2015_753_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0031/4365515/1eea1f0ff96e/12913_2015_753_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0031/4365515/851ee9031e20/12913_2015_753_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0031/4365515/ad45bb27c5ac/12913_2015_753_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0031/4365515/052c4cfb10d0/12913_2015_753_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0031/4365515/1eea1f0ff96e/12913_2015_753_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0031/4365515/851ee9031e20/12913_2015_753_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0031/4365515/ad45bb27c5ac/12913_2015_753_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0031/4365515/052c4cfb10d0/12913_2015_753_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cross-sectional study comparing public and private hospitals in Catalonia: is the practice of routine episiotomy changing?比较加泰罗尼亚公立医院和私立医院的横断面研究:常规会阴切开术的做法是否正在改变?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Mar 11;15:95. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0753-z.
2
Obstetric interventions in two groups of hospitals in Catalonia: a cross-sectional study.加泰罗尼亚两组医院的产科干预措施:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Apr 15;14:143. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-143.
3
Risk models for benchmarking severe perineal tears during vaginal childbirth: a cross-sectional study of public hospitals in South Australia, 2002-08.用于阴道分娩中重度会阴撕裂基准测试的风险模型:2002-08 年南澳大利亚公立医院的横断面研究。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;26(5):430-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01300.x. Epub 2012 May 28.
4
The effects of a severe perineal trauma prevention program in an Australian tertiary hospital: An observational study.澳大利亚一所 tertiary 医院严重会阴创伤预防项目的效果:一项观察性研究。
Women Birth. 2020 Jul;33(4):e371-e376. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.07.301. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
5
Impact of maternity care policy in Catalonia: a retrospective cross-sectional study of service delivery in public and private hospitals.加泰罗尼亚地区孕产妇护理政策的影响:一项关于公立和私立医院服务提供情况的回顾性横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Feb 13;15:23. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0446-y.
6
Risk of recurrence, subsequent mode of birth and morbidity for women who experienced severe perineal trauma in a first birth in New South Wales between 2000-2008: a population based data linkage study.2000-2008 年新南威尔士州首次分娩时发生严重会阴创伤的妇女的复发风险、后续分娩方式和发病情况:一项基于人群的数据链接研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Apr 8;13:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-89.
7
Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy.预测分娩时严重会阴创伤的因素:产钳助产常规联合会阴侧切术的作用
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;192(3):875-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.035.
8
The impact of selective episiotomy on maternal short-term morbidity: a retrospective study.选择性会阴切开术对产妇短期发病率的影响:一项回顾性研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Dec;44(1):2369664. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2024.2369664. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
9
Relation between Epidural Analgesia and severe perineal laceration in childbearing women in Catalonia.加泰罗尼亚地区育龄妇女硬膜外镇痛与严重会阴裂伤之间的关系
Midwifery. 2019 Mar;70:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.007. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
10
Prevalence and contributing factors of severe perineal damage following episiotomy-assisted vaginal delivery.会阴切开术辅助阴道分娩后严重会阴损伤的发生率及影响因素。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;53(4):481-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2013.07.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Midwives' approach to the prevention and repair of obstetric perineal trauma in Spain.西班牙助产士预防和修复产科会阴创伤的方法。
Nurs Open. 2024 Apr;11(4):e2160. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2160.
2
Episiotomy in Southern Brazil: prevalence, trend, and associated factors.巴西南部会阴切开术的流行情况、趋势及相关因素。
Rev Saude Publica. 2022 Apr 22;56:26. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056003908. eCollection 2022.
3
Trend and Inequality in Episiotomy in Southern Brazil, 2007-2016: Evidence of Reduced Abusive Practice.2007 - 2016年巴西南部会阴切开术的趋势与不平等:滥用行为减少的证据

本文引用的文献

1
Obstetric interventions in two groups of hospitals in Catalonia: a cross-sectional study.加泰罗尼亚两组医院的产科干预措施:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Apr 15;14:143. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-143.
2
Birth volume and the quality of obstetric care in rural hospitals.农村医院的出生量与产科护理质量
J Rural Health. 2014 Fall;30(4):335-43. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12061. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
3
Private health care coverage and increased risk of obstetric intervention.私人医疗保险与产科干预风险增加
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Jun;26(6):1231-1238. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03291-4. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
4
The Effects of the Pilates Method on Pelvic Floor Injuries during Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Quasi-Experimental Study.普拉提方法对妊娠和分娩期间盆底损伤的影响:一项准实验研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 30;18(13):6995. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136995.
5
Magnitude of Episiotomy and Associated Factors among Mothers Who Give Birth in Arba Minch General Hospital, Southern Ethiopia: Observation-Based Cross-Sectional Study.埃塞俄比亚南部阿尔巴明奇综合医院产妇会阴切开术的规模及相关因素:基于观察的横断面研究
J Pregnancy. 2020 Sep 1;2020:8395142. doi: 10.1155/2020/8395142. eCollection 2020.
6
Evidence-based Birth Attendance in Spain: Private Public Centers.西班牙循证分娩服务:私立与公立中心
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 12;16(5):894. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050894.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 13;14:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-13.
4
Changing associations of episiotomy and anal sphincter injury across risk strata: results of a population-based register study in Finland 2004-2011.2004-2011 年芬兰基于人群的注册研究:会阴切开术和肛门括约肌损伤风险分层关联的变化。
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 17;3(8):e003216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003216.
5
Morbidity from episiotomy.会阴切开术的发病率。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2013 Jun;63(6):696-701.
6
Can major systematic reviews influence practice patterns? A case study of episiotomy trends.主要的系统评价能影响实践模式吗?会阴切开术趋势的案例研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;288(6):1285-93. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2904-y. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
7
Evaluating maternity care using national administrative health datasets: how are statistics affected by the quality of data on method of delivery?利用国家行政健康数据集评估产妇护理:数据中分娩方式的质量如何影响统计结果?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 May 30;13:200. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-200.
8
Risk factors and midwife-reported reasons for episiotomy in women undergoing normal vaginal delivery.行会阴侧切术的正常阴道分娩产妇的风险因素和助产士报告的会阴侧切术理由。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;288(6):1249-56. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2897-6. Epub 2013 May 26.
9
The case for retaining severe perineal tears as an indicator of the quality of obstetric care.将严重会阴撕裂作为产科护理质量指标的理由。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Feb;53(1):3-8. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12014. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
10
Intrapartum care quality indicators: a systematic approach for achieving consensus.产时护理质量指标:达成共识的系统方法。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jan;166(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.09.018. Epub 2012 Oct 13.