Suppr超能文献

即时检测在检测白蛋白尿中的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care tests for detecting albuminuria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2014 Apr 15;160(8):550-7. doi: 10.7326/M13-2331.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Experts recommend screening for albuminuria in patients at risk for kidney disease.

PURPOSE

To systematically review evidence about the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care (POC) tests for detecting albuminuria in individuals for whom guidelines recommend such detection.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medion database, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index from 1963 through 5 December 2013; hand searches of other relevant journals; and reference lists.

STUDY SELECTION

Cross-sectional studies, published in any language, that compared the accuracy of machine-read POC tests of urinary albumin-creatinine ratio with that of laboratory measurement.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers extracted study data and assessed study quality using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Sixteen studies (n = 3356 patients) that evaluated semiquantitative or quantitative POC tests and used random urine samples collected in primary or secondary ambulatory care settings met inclusion criteria. Pooling results from a bivariate random-effects model gave sensitivity and specificity estimates of 76% (95% CI, 63% to 86%) and 93% (CI, 84% to 97%), respectively, for the semiquantitative test. Sensitivity and specificity estimates for the quantitative test were 96% (CI, 78% to 99%) and 98% (CI, 93% to 99%), respectively. The negative likelihood ratios for the semiquantitative and quantitative tests were 0.26 (CI, 0.16 to 0.40) and 0.04 (CI, 0.01 to 0.25), respectively.

LIMITATION

Accuracy estimates were based on data from single-sample urine measurement, but guidelines require that diagnosis of albuminuria be based on at least 2 of 3 samples collected in a 6-month period.

CONCLUSION

A negative semiquantitative POC test result does not rule out albuminuria, whereas quantitative POC testing meets required performance standards and can be used to rule out albuminuria.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None.

摘要

背景

专家建议对有肾脏疾病风险的患者进行蛋白尿筛查。

目的

系统回顾关于即时检测(POC)试验检测指南推荐进行蛋白尿检测的个体的蛋白尿的诊断准确性的证据。

数据来源

Cochrane 图书馆、EMBASE、Medion 数据库、MEDLINE 和科学引文索引,从 1963 年至 2013 年 12 月 5 日;对其他相关期刊的手工检索;和参考文献列表。

研究选择

以机器读取的尿白蛋白/肌酐比值的 POC 试验与实验室测量的准确性进行比较的横断面研究,无论语言如何发表。

数据提取

两位独立的综述员使用 QUADAS-2(诊断准确性研究的质量评估 2)工具提取研究数据并评估研究质量。

数据综合

纳入了 16 项研究(n=3356 例患者),这些研究评估了半定量或定量 POC 试验,并使用初级或二级门诊护理环境中采集的随机尿液样本。来自二元随机效应模型的汇总结果分别为半定量试验的敏感性和特异性估计值为 76%(95%CI,63%至 86%)和 93%(CI,84%至 97%)。定量试验的敏感性和特异性估计值分别为 96%(CI,78%至 99%)和 98%(CI,93%至 99%)。半定量和定量试验的负似然比分别为 0.26(CI,0.16 至 0.40)和 0.04(CI,0.01 至 0.25)。

局限性

准确性估计值基于单次尿液测量数据,但指南要求至少 3 次 6 个月内采集的样本中 2 次诊断为蛋白尿。

结论

阴性半定量 POC 试验结果不能排除蛋白尿,而定量 POC 检测符合所需的性能标准,可用于排除蛋白尿。

主要资金来源

无。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验