Ann Intern Med. 2014 Apr 15;160(8):550-7. doi: 10.7326/M13-2331.
Experts recommend screening for albuminuria in patients at risk for kidney disease.
To systematically review evidence about the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care (POC) tests for detecting albuminuria in individuals for whom guidelines recommend such detection.
Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medion database, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index from 1963 through 5 December 2013; hand searches of other relevant journals; and reference lists.
Cross-sectional studies, published in any language, that compared the accuracy of machine-read POC tests of urinary albumin-creatinine ratio with that of laboratory measurement.
Two independent reviewers extracted study data and assessed study quality using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) tool.
Sixteen studies (n = 3356 patients) that evaluated semiquantitative or quantitative POC tests and used random urine samples collected in primary or secondary ambulatory care settings met inclusion criteria. Pooling results from a bivariate random-effects model gave sensitivity and specificity estimates of 76% (95% CI, 63% to 86%) and 93% (CI, 84% to 97%), respectively, for the semiquantitative test. Sensitivity and specificity estimates for the quantitative test were 96% (CI, 78% to 99%) and 98% (CI, 93% to 99%), respectively. The negative likelihood ratios for the semiquantitative and quantitative tests were 0.26 (CI, 0.16 to 0.40) and 0.04 (CI, 0.01 to 0.25), respectively.
Accuracy estimates were based on data from single-sample urine measurement, but guidelines require that diagnosis of albuminuria be based on at least 2 of 3 samples collected in a 6-month period.
A negative semiquantitative POC test result does not rule out albuminuria, whereas quantitative POC testing meets required performance standards and can be used to rule out albuminuria.
None.
专家建议对有肾脏疾病风险的患者进行蛋白尿筛查。
系统回顾关于即时检测(POC)试验检测指南推荐进行蛋白尿检测的个体的蛋白尿的诊断准确性的证据。
Cochrane 图书馆、EMBASE、Medion 数据库、MEDLINE 和科学引文索引,从 1963 年至 2013 年 12 月 5 日;对其他相关期刊的手工检索;和参考文献列表。
以机器读取的尿白蛋白/肌酐比值的 POC 试验与实验室测量的准确性进行比较的横断面研究,无论语言如何发表。
两位独立的综述员使用 QUADAS-2(诊断准确性研究的质量评估 2)工具提取研究数据并评估研究质量。
纳入了 16 项研究(n=3356 例患者),这些研究评估了半定量或定量 POC 试验,并使用初级或二级门诊护理环境中采集的随机尿液样本。来自二元随机效应模型的汇总结果分别为半定量试验的敏感性和特异性估计值为 76%(95%CI,63%至 86%)和 93%(CI,84%至 97%)。定量试验的敏感性和特异性估计值分别为 96%(CI,78%至 99%)和 98%(CI,93%至 99%)。半定量和定量试验的负似然比分别为 0.26(CI,0.16 至 0.40)和 0.04(CI,0.01 至 0.25)。
准确性估计值基于单次尿液测量数据,但指南要求至少 3 次 6 个月内采集的样本中 2 次诊断为蛋白尿。
阴性半定量 POC 试验结果不能排除蛋白尿,而定量 POC 检测符合所需的性能标准,可用于排除蛋白尿。
无。