Ralston J D, Cook A J, Anderson M L, Catz S L, Fishman P A, Carlson J, Johnson R, Green B B
Group Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave , Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101-1448.
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Mar 12;5(1):232-48. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-10-RA-0079. eCollection 2014.
We evaluated the role of home monitoring, communication with pharmacists, medication intensification, medication adherence and lifestyle factors in contributing to the effectiveness of an intervention to improve blood pressure control in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension.
We performed a mediation analysis of a published randomized trial based on the Chronic Care Model delivered over a secure patient website from June 2005 to December 2007. Study arms analyzed included usual care with a home blood pressure monitor and usual care with home blood pressure monitor and web-based pharmacist care. Mediator measures included secure messaging and telephone encounters; home blood pressure monitoring; medications intensification and adherence and lifestyle factors. Overall fidelity to the Chronic Care Model was assessed with the Patient Assessment of Chronic Care (PACIC) instrument. The primary outcome was percent of participants with blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mm Hg.
At 12 months follow-up, patients in the web-based pharmacist care group were more likely to have BP <140/90 mm Hg (55%) compared to patients in the group with home blood pressure monitors only (37%) (p = 0.001). Home blood pressure monitoring accounted for 30.3% of the intervention effect, secure electronic messaging accounted for 96%, and medication intensification for 29.3%. Medication adherence and self-report of fruit and vegetable intake and weight change were not different between the two study groups. The PACIC score accounted for 22.0 % of the main intervention effect.
The effect of web-based pharmacist care on improved blood pressure control was explained in part through a combination of home blood pressure monitoring, secure messaging, and antihypertensive medication intensification.
我们评估了家庭监测、与药剂师沟通、药物强化治疗、药物依从性和生活方式因素对改善未控制的原发性高血压患者血压控制干预措施有效性的作用。
我们对一项已发表的随机试验进行了中介分析,该试验基于2005年6月至2007年12月通过安全患者网站提供的慢性病护理模型。分析的研究组包括使用家用血压计的常规护理组以及使用家用血压计和基于网络的药剂师护理的常规护理组。中介措施包括安全消息传递和电话沟通;家庭血压监测;药物强化治疗、依从性和生活方式因素。使用慢性病护理患者评估(PACIC)工具评估对慢性病护理模型的总体保真度。主要结局是血压(BP)<140/90 mmHg的参与者百分比。
在12个月的随访中,与仅使用家用血压计的组中的患者相比,基于网络的药剂师护理组中的患者更有可能血压<140/90 mmHg(55%)(仅使用家用血压计的组为37%)(p = 0.001)。家庭血压监测占干预效果 的30.3%,安全电子消息传递占96%,药物强化治疗占29.3%。两个研究组之间的药物依从性以及水果和蔬菜摄入量及体重变化的自我报告没有差异。PACIC评分占主要干预效果的22.0%。
基于网络的药剂师护理对改善血压控制的效果部分是通过家庭血压监测、安全消息传递和抗高血压药物强化治疗的组合来解释的。