Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, USA.
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr;17(4):e96-103.
To determine if a multimodal intervention composed of patient education, home blood pressure (BP) monitoring, BP measurement reporting to an interactive voice response (IVR) phone system, and clinical pharmacist follow-up improves BP control compared with usual care.
Prospective study with patient enrollment, medication consultation and adjustment, remote BP monitoring, and follow-up at 6 months.
This randomized controlled trial was conducted at 3 healthcare systems in Denver, Colorado, including a large health maintenance organization, a Veterans Affairs medical center, and a county hospital. At each site, patients with uncontrolled BP were randomized to the multimodal intervention vs usual care for 6 months, with the primary end point of BP reduction.
Of 338 patients randomized, 283 (84%) completed the study, including 138 intervention patients and 145 usual care patients. Baseline BP was higher in the intervention group vs the usual care group (150.5/89.4 vs 143.8/85.3 mm Hg). At 6 months, BPs were similar in the intervention group vs the usual care group (137.4 vs 136.7 mm Hg, P = .85 for systolic; 82.9 vs 81.1 mm Hg, P = .14 for diastolic). However, BP reductions were greater in the intervention group vs the usual care group (−13.1 vs −7.1 mm Hg, P = .006 for systolic; −6.5 vs −4.2 mm Hg, P = .07 for diastolic). Adherence to medications was similar between the 2 groups, but intervention patients had a greater increase in medication regimen intensity.
A multimodal intervention of patient education, home BP monitoring, BP measurement reporting to an IVR system, and clinical pharmacist follow-up achieved greater reductions in BP compared with usual care.
确定由患者教育、家庭血压(BP)监测、向交互式语音应答(IVR)电话系统报告 BP 测量值以及临床药师随访组成的多模式干预是否比常规护理更能改善血压控制。
前瞻性研究,包括患者入组、药物咨询和调整、远程 BP 监测以及 6 个月随访。
这项随机对照试验在科罗拉多州丹佛市的 3 家医疗保健系统中进行,包括一家大型健康维护组织、一家退伍军人事务医疗中心和一家县医院。在每个地点,血压控制不佳的患者被随机分配到多模式干预组或常规护理组,为期 6 个月,主要终点是血压降低。
在 338 名随机患者中,有 283 名(84%)完成了研究,包括 138 名干预患者和 145 名常规护理患者。干预组的基线血压高于常规护理组(150.5/89.4 对 143.8/85.3mmHg)。6 个月时,干预组与常规护理组的血压相似(收缩压 137.4 对 136.7mmHg,P=0.85;舒张压 82.9 对 81.1mmHg,P=0.14)。然而,干预组的血压降低幅度大于常规护理组(收缩压-13.1 对-7.1mmHg,P=0.006;舒张压-6.5 对-4.2mmHg,P=0.07)。两组患者对药物的依从性相似,但干预组的药物治疗方案强度增加更大。
与常规护理相比,患者教育、家庭 BP 监测、向 IVR 系统报告 BP 测量值以及临床药师随访的多模式干预可更有效地降低血压。