Department of Physical Therapy, University of New England, Portland, ME.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Aug;95(8):1527-32. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.027. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
To validate the administration of the Life-Space Assessment (LSA) and Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) surveys to proxy informants, as would be necessary when measuring long-term outcomes in acutely ill, hospitalized older adults who are initially incapacitated but eventually return to the community.
Cross-sectional study.
General community.
Convenience sample of dyads (N=40) composed of an ambulatory older adult and a familiar companion.
Dyads completed the LSA and PASE surveys on 1 occasion. Companions based their responses on the recent mobility and physical activity of the older adult.
Paired total scores for each instrument.
At a group level, the difference between older adult and companion mean scores for each instrument was not significant (P>.05). Standardized mean difference values were small (d<0.1). Paired scores were significantly yet moderately associated: intraclass correlation coefficient(1,1)=.84 to .88; P<.01. Difference in scores was not associated with time spent together (P>.05) or older adult gait speed (P>.05). At an individual level, older adults and companions agreed more closely on the LSA than on the PASE. However, disagreement in excess of estimated measurement error occurred in 40% of the dyads for the LSA and in none of the dyads for the PASE.
Older adults and companions collectively provided similar responses on each instrument. Nonetheless, varying levels of agreement within individual dyads suggested that proxy responses should be considered carefully. Implications for clinical research and practice research are discussed.
验证使用 Life-Space 评估(LSA)和老年人体力活动量表(PASE)对代理人进行调查,这在测量长期处于急性期、住院的、最初丧失能力但最终返回社区的老年人的结果时是必要的。
横断面研究。
一般社区。
由活动能力正常的老年人和熟悉的同伴组成的方便样本对(N=40)。
对 1 次完成 LSA 和 PASE 调查。同伴根据老年人最近的活动能力和体力活动来回答问题。
每个仪器的配对总分。
在群体水平上,仪器的每个仪器的老年人和同伴的平均得分之间的差异无统计学意义(P>.05)。标准化平均差异值较小(d<0.1)。配对评分具有显著但适度的相关性:组内相关系数(1,1)=.84 至.88;P<.01。得分差异与在一起度过的时间(P>.05)或老年人的步态速度(P>.05)无关。在个体水平上,老年人和同伴在 LSA 上的一致性比 PASE 更高。然而,在 40%的对中,LSA 出现了超出估计测量误差的不一致,而 PASE 则没有出现这种情况。
老年人和同伴在每个仪器上共同提供了相似的反应。尽管如此,个别对之间的一致性程度存在差异,这表明代理反应应谨慎考虑。讨论了对临床研究和实践研究的影响。