Ryder-Burbidge Charlotte, Wieler Marguerite, Nykiforuk Candace I J, Jones C Allyson
School of Public Health, University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.
Department of Physical Therapy University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2022 Jan 19;9(3):351-361. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13406. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Life-space mobility (LSM) captures a broad spectrum of mobility in physical and social environments; however, it has not been extensively studied in Parkinson's disease. Using a multiple-methods approach, individual, social and environmental factors that impact LSM were explored in PD.
Two hundred twenty-seven participants with PD (n = 113) and a comparative group without PD (n = 114) were recruited from the community. Within a cross-sectional survey, LSM (University of Alabama Birmingham Life-Space Assessment, LSA) was compared in the two groups. Using multiple linear regression, socio-demographics, lifestyle behaviors, medical, mobility and social factors were examined to identify factors that explained LSM. A qualitative narrative inquiry was completed to augment the findings from the survey; 10 participants with PD were interviewed regarding facilitators and barriers to mobility.
The mean overall LSA-composite score for the PD group was 64.2 (SD = 25.8) and 70.3 (SD = 23.1) for the community comparative group (mean difference = 6 points, 95%CI:-0.4, 12.5) indicating most participants moved independently beyond their neighborhoods. A higher proportion of the PD group required assistance with mobility than the community comparison group. Not driving, receiving caregiving, lower social participation, and lower monthly family finances were associated with restricted LSM in the PD group. Data from qualitative interviews supported quantitative findings and offered insights into the features of the built environment that facilitate and restrict mobility.
Individual, social and environmental factors are associated with the LSM among persons with PD. Clinicians and policy-makers should include both individual and community-based factors when developing interventions to encourage the LSM of the PD population.
生活空间移动性(LSM)涵盖了身体和社会环境中的广泛移动性;然而,它在帕金森病中尚未得到广泛研究。本研究采用多种方法,探讨了影响帕金森病患者LSM的个体、社会和环境因素。
从社区招募了227名帕金森病患者(n = 113)和一个无帕金森病的对照组(n = 114)。在横断面调查中,比较了两组的LSM(阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校生活空间评估,LSA)。使用多元线性回归,对社会人口统计学、生活方式行为、医疗、移动性和社会因素进行了检查,以确定解释LSM的因素。完成了一项定性叙事探究,以补充调查结果;对10名帕金森病患者进行了访谈,询问了移动性的促进因素和障碍。
帕金森病组的平均总体LSA综合评分为64.2(标准差 = 25.8),社区对照组为70.3(标准差 = 23.1)(平均差异 = 6分,95%CI:-0.4,12.5),表明大多数参与者能够独立走出社区。与社区对照组相比,帕金森病组中需要移动协助的比例更高。不驾车、接受照料、社会参与度较低以及家庭月收入较低与帕金森病组受限的LSM相关。定性访谈数据支持了定量研究结果,并提供了对促进和限制移动性的建筑环境特征的见解。
个体、社会和环境因素与帕金森病患者的LSM相关。临床医生和政策制定者在制定鼓励帕金森病患者LSM的干预措施时,应同时考虑个体和基于社区的因素。