Asklepios Clinic North - Ochsenzoll, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Medical Faculty, Semmelweis University , Hamburg , Germany ; Psychiatric Clinics of the University of Basel , Basel , Switzerland.
Psychiatric Clinics of the University of Basel , Basel , Switzerland.
Front Psychiatry. 2014 Mar 31;5:36. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00036. eCollection 2014.
In a randomized, controlled trial (n = 30), we showed that botulinum toxin injection to the glabellar region produces a marked improvement in the symptoms of major depression. We hypothesized that the mood-lifting effect was mediated by facial feedback mechanisms. Here we assessed if agitation, which may be associated with increased dynamic psychomotor activity of the facial musculature, can predict response to the treatment. To test this hypothesis, we re-analyzed the data of the scales from our previous study on a single item basis and compared the baseline scores in the agitation item (item 9) of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) between responders (n = 9) and participants who did not attain response (n = 6) among the recipients of onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 15). Responders had significantly higher item 9 scores at baseline [1.56 + 0.88 vs. 0.33 + 0.52, t (13) = 3.04, d = 1.7, p = 0.01], while no other single item of the HAM-D or the Beck Depression Inventory was associated with treatment response. The agitation score had an overall precision of 78% in predicting response in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (area under the curve, AUC = 0.87). These data provide a link between response to botulinum toxin treatment with a psychomotor manifestation of depression and thereby indirect support of the proposed facial feedback mechanism of action. Moreover, it suggests that patients with agitated depression may particularly benefit from botulinum toxin treatment.
在一项随机对照试验(n=30)中,我们表明,肉毒毒素注射到皱眉肌区域可显著改善重度抑郁症的症状。我们假设这种改善情绪的作用是通过面部反馈机制介导的。在这里,我们评估了激越是否可能与面部肌肉的动态精神运动活动增加有关,并预测其对治疗的反应。为了验证这一假设,我们根据我们之前关于肉毒毒素治疗抑郁症的研究中的单一项目重新分析了这些数据,并比较了汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)激越项(第 9 项)的基线评分在应答者(n=9)和未应答者(n=6)之间,在接受肉毒毒素 A(n=15)治疗的患者中。应答者的基线第 9 项得分显著更高[1.56+0.88 与 0.33+0.52,t(13)=3.04,d=1.7,p=0.01],而 HAM-D 或贝克抑郁量表的其他任何单一项目均与治疗反应无关。在接受者操作特征(ROC)分析中,激越评分预测反应的总精度为 78%(曲线下面积,AUC=0.87)。这些数据为肉毒毒素治疗反应与抑郁的精神运动表现之间提供了联系,从而间接支持了所提出的面部反馈作用机制。此外,它表明,患有激越性抑郁症的患者可能特别受益于肉毒毒素治疗。