Missitzi Julia, Gentner Reinhard, Misitzi Angelica, Geladas Nickos, Politis Panagiotis, Klissouras Vassilis, Classen Joseph
Ergophysiology Research Laboratory, Department of Sport Medicine and Biology of Physical Activity, University of Athens, Athens, Greece ; Human Cortical Physiology and Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
Human Cortical Physiology and Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
Physiol Rep. 2013 Dec 17;1(7):e00188. doi: 10.1002/phy2.188. eCollection 2013 Dec 1.
The aim of this study was to elucidate the relative contribution of genes and environment on individual differences in motor control and acquisition of a force control task, in view of recent association studies showing that several candidate polymorphisms may have an effect on them. Forty-four healthy female twins performed brisk isometric abductions with their right thumb. Force was recorded by a transducer and fed back to the subject on a computer screen. The task was to place the tracing of the peak force in a force window defined between 30% and 40% of the subject's maximum force, as determined beforehand. The initial level of proficiency was defined as the number of attempts reaching the force window criterion within the first 100 trials. The difference between the number of successful trials within the last and the first 100 trials was taken as a measure of motor learning. For motor control, defined by the initial level of proficiency, the intrapair differences in monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins were 6.8 ± 7.8 and 13.8 ± 8.4, and the intrapair correlations 0.77 and 0.39, respectively. Heritability was estimated at 0.68. Likewise for motor learning intrapair differences in the increment of the number of successful trials in MZ and DZ twins were 5.4 ± 5.2 and 12.8 ± 7, and the intrapair correlations 0.58 and 0.19. Heritability reached 0.70. The present findings suggest that heredity accounts for a major part of existing differences in motor control and motor learning, but uncertainty remains which gene polymorphisms may be responsible.
鉴于最近的关联研究表明,几种候选基因多态性可能对运动控制和力量控制任务的习得产生影响,本研究旨在阐明基因和环境对运动控制个体差异以及力量控制任务习得的相对贡献。44名健康女性双胞胎用右手拇指进行快速等长外展动作。通过传感器记录力量,并在电脑屏幕上反馈给受试者。任务是将峰值力量的轨迹置于事先确定的、在受试者最大力量的30%至40%之间定义的力量窗口内。初始熟练程度定义为在前100次试验中达到力量窗口标准的尝试次数。将最后100次试验与前100次试验中成功试验次数的差异作为运动学习的指标。对于由初始熟练程度定义的运动控制,同卵双胞胎(MZ)和异卵双胞胎(DZ)的对内差异分别为6.8±7.8和13.8±8.4,对内相关性分别为0.77和0.39。遗传度估计为0.68。同样,对于运动学习,MZ和DZ双胞胎成功试验次数增量的对内差异分别为5.4±5.2和12.8±7,对内相关性分别为0.58和0.19。遗传度达到0.70。目前的研究结果表明,遗传因素在运动控制和运动学习的现有差异中占主要部分,但仍不确定哪些基因多态性可能起作用。