Abbott Rebecca A, Whear Rebecca, Rodgers Lauren R, Bethel Alison, Thompson Coon Jo, Kuyken Willem, Stein Ken, Dickens Chris
PenCLAHRC, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter EX2 4SG, United Kingdom.
PenCLAHRC, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter EX2 4SG, United Kingdom.
J Psychosom Res. 2014 May;76(5):341-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.02.012. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
To determine the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) on psychological and physical outcomes for people with vascular disease.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, British Nursing Index, Medline, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Central, Social Sciences Citation Index, Social Policy and Practice, and HMIC from inception to January 2013.
Articles were screened for inclusion independently by two reviewers. Data extraction and quality appraisal were performed by one reviewer and checked by a second with discrepancies resolved by discussion with a third if necessary. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed.
Nine articles (from eight original randomised controlled trials) met eligibility criteria and were included in the final review. In total, 578 participants were enrolled across the trials, with participants presenting with prehypertension/hypertension (n=3 trials), type 1 or 2 diabetes (n=2), heart disease (n=2) and stroke (n=1). Meta-analyses, using standardised mean differences, showed evidence of reductions in stress (-0.36; 95% CI -0.67 to -0.09; p=0.01), depression (-0.35; 95% CI -0.53 to -0.16; p=0.003) and anxiety (-0.50; 95% CI -0.70 to -0.29; p<0.001). Effects on physical outcomes (blood pressure, albuminuria, stress hormones) were mixed.
Whilst populations with vascular disease appear to derive a range of psychological benefits from MBSR/MBCT intervention, the effects on physical parameters of disease are not yet established. More robust studies, with longer term follow-up, are required to ascertain full effectiveness of such intervention.
确定基于正念的减压疗法(MBSR)和基于正念的认知疗法(MBCT)对血管疾病患者心理和身体状况的疗效。
对随机对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
从数据库建立至2013年1月的AMED、CINAHL、EMBASE、英国护理索引、Medline、科学引文索引、PsycINFO、Cochrane系统评价数据库、Central、社会科学引文索引、社会政策与实践以及英国卫生管理与信息中心。
由两名评审员独立筛选纳入的文章。数据提取和质量评估由一名评审员进行,另一名评审员进行检查,如有分歧则通过与第三名评审员讨论解决。进行随机效应荟萃分析。
9篇文章(来自8项原始随机对照试验)符合纳入标准并纳入最终综述。这些试验共纳入578名参与者,参与者患有高血压前期/高血压(n = 3项试验)、1型或2型糖尿病(n = 2)、心脏病(n = 2)和中风(n = 1)。使用标准化均数差进行的荟萃分析显示,有证据表明压力(-0.36;95%CI -0.67至-0.09;p = 0.01)、抑郁(-0.35;95%CI -0.53至-0.16;p = 0.003)和焦虑(-0.50;95%CI -0.70至-0.29;p < 0.001)有所降低。对身体状况(血压、蛋白尿、应激激素)的影响不一。
虽然血管疾病患者似乎能从MBSR/MBCT干预中获得一系列心理益处,但对疾病身体参数的影响尚未明确。需要更有力的研究和长期随访来确定这种干预的全面疗效。