• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境态度与政治党派倾向。

Environmental attitudes and political partisanship.

机构信息

Ithaca College, 953 Danby Road, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.

Ithaca College, 953 Danby Road, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.

出版信息

Public Health. 2014 May;128(5):404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2014.03.005
PMID:24746473
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the impact of political partisanship on environmental attitudes related to climate change in United States and its implications for public health.

STUDY DESIGN

An integrative literature review.

METHODS

A literature review of English articles was performed from January 2013 to March 2013 using the following databases: CINAHL, PubMed, Academic Search Premier, Business Source Premier, ERIC, psychINFO, and Wiley Online Library. Empirical and review articles and Internet sources were included.

RESULTS

Continued mass emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases will exacerbate the consequences of global warming and climate change. As one of the key global contributors of carbon emissions, the lack of climate change policy and regulatory practices at the federal level in the United States is of great concern. Political partisanship in the US is largely to blame for this inaction, as efforts for drastic remediation action is met with rejection from conservative groups who do not believe that global warming and climate change are a problem, despite scientific evidence to the contrary. To promote the health of the entire population, there needs to be a paradigm shift from consumption driven economic growth as advocated by the Republicans to a realization of true prosperity beyond growth in order to create a sustainable world.

CONCLUSION

This presents a critical challenge to public health professionals as political partisanship has the power to impact environmental attitudes and have serious implications for public health. Preserving the environment must take precedence over economic growth if we want a habitable planet low in carbon.

摘要

目的

探讨美国政治党派立场对气候变化相关环境态度的影响及其对公共卫生的影响。

研究设计

综合文献回顾。

方法

2013 年 1 月至 3 月,使用 CINAHL、PubMed、Academic Search Premier、Business Source Premier、ERIC、psychINFO 和 Wiley Online Library 等数据库,对英文文献进行了文献回顾。纳入了实证和综述文章以及互联网资源。

结果

持续大量排放二氧化碳和其他温室气体将加剧全球变暖及气候变化的后果。作为全球主要碳排放国之一,美国在联邦层面缺乏气候变化政策和监管措施,令人深感担忧。美国的政治党派立场在很大程度上导致了这种不作为,因为采取激烈的补救行动的努力遭到了保守派团体的反对,他们不认为全球变暖与气候变化是个问题,尽管有相反的科学证据。为了促进全体人民的健康,需要从共和党所倡导的以消费为导向的经济增长模式向超越增长的真正繁荣的观念转变,以创造一个可持续的世界。

结论

这对公共卫生专业人员构成了重大挑战,因为政治党派立场有能力影响环境态度,并对公共卫生产生严重影响。如果我们想要一个低碳的宜居星球,保护环境必须优先于经济增长。

相似文献

1
Environmental attitudes and political partisanship.环境态度与政治党派倾向。
Public Health. 2014 May;128(5):404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
2
The real climate debate.真正的气候辩论。
Nature. 2017 Oct 11;550(7675):S62-S64. doi: 10.1038/550S62a.
3
Public attitudes toward biofuels. Effects of knowledge, political partisanship, and media use.公众对生物燃料的态度。知识、政治党派性和媒体使用的影响。
Politics Life Sci. 2012 Spring-Fall;31(1-2):36-51. doi: 10.2990/31_1-2_36.
4
Climate change and health: information to counter the White House Effect.气候变化与健康:应对白宫效应的信息
Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Aug;30(4):655-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.4.655.
5
Overview of regulatory/policy/economic issues related to carbon dioxide.与二氧化碳相关的监管/政策/经济问题概述
Environ Int. 2003 Jun;29(2-3):303-10. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00161-7.
6
Global warming, population growth, and natural resources for food production.全球变暖、人口增长与粮食生产的自然资源
Soc Nat Resour. 1991 Oct-Dec;4(4):347-63. doi: 10.1080/08941929109380766.
7
The debate on climate change and health in the context of ecological public health: a necessary corrective to Costello et al.'s 'biggest global health threat', or co-opted apologists for the neoliberal hegemony?生态公共卫生视角下的气候变化与健康辩论:对科斯特洛等人提出的“全球最大健康威胁”的必要修正,还是新自由主义霸权的同谋辩护者?
Public Health. 2014 Dec;128(12):1059-65. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.08.017. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
8
The dynamics of health care opinion, 2008-2010: partisanship, self-interest, and racial resentment.2008-2010 年医疗保健意见的动态:党派偏见、自身利益和种族怨恨。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2011 Dec;36(6):945-60. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1460533.
9
Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy.两党公众支持气候政策的心理障碍。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;13(4):492-507. doi: 10.1177/1745691617748966.
10
Climate Change, Climate Justice, and Environmental Health: Implications for the Nursing Profession.气候变化、气候正义与环境卫生:对护理专业的影响。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017 Nov;49(6):606-616. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12326. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Social norms explain prioritization of climate policy.社会规范解释了气候政策的优先次序。
Clim Change. 2022;173(1-2):10. doi: 10.1007/s10584-022-03396-x. Epub 2022 Jul 18.