Gonzalez John, Trickett Edison J
Department of Psychology, Bemidji State University, 1500 Birchmont Dr NE #23, Bemidji, MN, 56601, USA,
Am J Community Psychol. 2014 Sep;54(1-2):112-24. doi: 10.1007/s10464-014-9655-1.
This paper describes the processes we engaged into develop a measurement protocol used to assess the outcomes in a community based suicide and alcohol abuse prevention project with two Alaska Native communities. While the literature on community-based participatory research (CBPR) is substantial regarding the importance of collaborations, few studies have reported on this collaboration in the process of developing measures to assess CBPR projects. We first tell a story of the processes around the standard issues of doing cross-cultural work on measurement development related to areas of equivalence. A second story is provided that highlights how community differences within the same cultural group can affect both the process and content of culturally relevant measurement selection, adaptation, and development.
本文描述了我们为制定一个测量方案而开展的过程,该测量方案用于评估阿拉斯加两个原住民社区开展的一项基于社区的自杀与酒精滥用预防项目的成果。虽然关于社区参与式研究(CBPR)的文献大量论述了合作的重要性,但很少有研究报告在开发评估CBPR项目的测量方法过程中的这种合作情况。我们首先讲述一个围绕在测量开发方面开展跨文化工作的标准问题(与等效性领域相关)的过程故事。接着提供了另一个故事,突出了同一文化群体内的社区差异如何能够影响与文化相关的测量选择、调整及开发的过程和内容。