Pfeil Johannes, Borrmann Steffen, Tozan Yeşim
Centre for Childhood and Adolescent Medicine and Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Heidelberg, Germany.
Kenyan Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kilifi, Kenya; Institute of Tropical Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 18;9(4):e95681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095681. eCollection 2014.
Recent multi-centre trials showed that dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) was as efficacious and safe as artemether-lumefantrine (AL) for treatment of young children with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria across diverse transmission settings in Africa. Longitudinal follow-up of patients in these trials supported previous findings that DP had a longer post-treatment prophylactic effect than AL, reducing the risk of reinfection and conferring additional health benefits to patients, particularly in areas with moderate to high malaria transmission.
We developed a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of DP versus AL for first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria in young children from the provider perspective, taking into consideration the post-treatment prophylactic effects of the drugs as reported by a recent multi-centre trial in Africa and using the maximum manufacturer drug prices for artemisinin-based combination therapies set by the Global Fund in 2013. We estimated the price per course of treatment threshold above which DP would cease to be a cost-saving alternative to AL as a first-line antimalarial drug.
First-line treatment with DP compared to AL averted 0.03 DALYs (95% CI: 0.006-0.07) and 0.001 deaths (95% CI: 0.00-0.002) and saved $0.96 (95% CI: 0.33-2.46) per child over one year. The results of the threshold analysis showed that DP remained cost-saving over AL for any DP cost below $1.23 per course of treatment.
DP is superior to AL from both the clinical and economic perspectives for treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in young children. A paediatric dispersible formulation of DP is under development and should facilitate a targeted deployment of this antimalarial drug. The use of DP as first-line antimalarial drug in paediatric malaria patients in moderate to high transmission areas of Africa merits serious consideration by health policymakers.
近期的多中心试验表明,在非洲不同传播环境下,双氢青蒿素哌喹(DP)治疗非复杂性恶性疟原虫疟疾幼儿的疗效和安全性与蒿甲醚本芴醇(AL)相当。这些试验中患者的纵向随访支持了先前的研究结果,即DP的治疗后预防效果比AL更长,降低了再次感染的风险,并为患者带来了额外的健康益处,特别是在疟疾传播程度为中度至高度的地区。
我们建立了一个马尔可夫模型,从提供者的角度评估DP与AL用于幼儿非复杂性疟疾一线治疗的成本效益,考虑到最近在非洲进行的一项多中心试验报告的药物治疗后预防效果,并使用全球基金2013年设定的青蒿素联合疗法的最高制造商药品价格。我们估计了每疗程治疗的价格阈值,高于该阈值DP将不再是作为一线抗疟药物比AL更具成本效益的选择。
与AL相比,DP一线治疗在一年中每个儿童避免了0.03伤残调整生命年(95%置信区间:0.006 - 0.07)和0.001例死亡(95%置信区间:0.00 - 0.002),并节省了成本0.96美元(95%置信区间:0.33 - 2.46)。阈值分析结果表明,对于每疗程治疗成本低于1.23美元的任何DP,DP相对于AL仍具有成本效益。
从临床和经济角度来看,DP在治疗幼儿非复杂性恶性疟原虫疟疾方面均优于AL。一种儿科可分散片剂的DP正在研发中,这应有助于这种抗疟药物的靶向部署。在非洲疟疾传播程度为中度至高度地区的儿科疟疾患者中使用DP作为一线抗疟药物值得卫生政策制定者认真考虑。