• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤后韦氏成人智力量表第四版的临床应用价值。

Clinical utility of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition after traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Donders Jacobus, Strong Carrie-Ann H

机构信息

Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, USA

Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2015 Feb;22(1):17-22. doi: 10.1177/1073191114530776. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1177/1073191114530776
PMID:24752385
Abstract

The performance of 100 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) was compared with that of 100 demographically matched neurologically healthy controls. Processing Speed was the only WAIS-IV factor index that was able to discriminate between persons with moderate-severe TBI on the one hand and persons with either less severe TBI or neurologically healthy controls on the other hand. The Processing Speed index also had acceptable sensitivity and specificity when differentiating between patients with TBI who either did or did not have scores in the clinically significant range on the Trail Making Test. It is concluded that WAIS-IV Processing Speed has acceptable clinical utility in the evaluation of patients with moderate-severe TBI but that it should be supplemented with other measures to assure sufficient accuracy in the diagnostic process.

摘要

将100例创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者在韦氏成人智力量表第四版(WAIS-IV)上的表现与100名人口统计学匹配的神经健康对照者进行了比较。处理速度是WAIS-IV唯一能够区分中度至重度TBI患者与轻度TBI患者或神经健康对照者的因子指数。在区分TBI患者在连线测验中是否有临床显著范围内的得分时,处理速度指数也具有可接受的敏感性和特异性。结论是,WAIS-IV处理速度在评估中度至重度TBI患者时有可接受的临床效用,但在诊断过程中应辅以其他措施以确保足够的准确性。

相似文献

1
Clinical utility of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后韦氏成人智力量表第四版的临床应用价值。
Assessment. 2015 Feb;22(1):17-22. doi: 10.1177/1073191114530776. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
2
An examination of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) in individuals with complicated mild, moderate and Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).对伴有复杂轻度、中度和重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的个体进行韦氏成人智力量表第四版(WAIS-IV)的检查。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(1):21-37. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1005677. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
3
Criterion validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition after pediatric traumatic brain injury.儿童创伤性脑损伤后韦氏儿童智力量表第四版的效标效度
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008 Jul;14(4):651-5. doi: 10.1017/S1355617708080752.
4
Clinical utility of demographically corrected WAIS-III subtest scores after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后经人口统计学校正的韦氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS-III)分测验分数的临床效用
Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Apr;23(3):373-84. doi: 10.1080/13854040802279691. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
5
Diagnostic efficiency of demographically corrected Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III and Wechsler Memory Scale-III indices in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury and lower education levels.在中重度创伤性脑损伤和较低教育水平人群中,经人口统计学校正后的韦氏成人智力量表 III 和韦氏记忆量表 III 指标的诊断效率。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Nov;15(6):938-50. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709990610. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
6
Validity of demographically corrected norms for the WAIS-III.韦氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS-III)经人口统计学校正常模的效度
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005 Aug;27(6):746-58. doi: 10.1081/13803390490919155.
7
Discrepancy between predicted and obtained WAIS-R IQ scores discriminates between traumatic brain injury and insufficient effort.韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)预测智商分数与实际获得的智商分数之间的差异可区分创伤性脑损伤和努力不足。
Psychol Assess. 2001 Jun;13(2):240-8.
8
Criterion validity of new WAIS-II subtest scores after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后新韦氏成人智力量表第二版(WAIS-II)分测验分数的效标效度
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001 Nov;7(7):892-8.
9
Psychometric intelligence in patients with traumatic brain injury: utility of a new screening measure.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Mar;80(3):346-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90150-8.
10
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition findings in relation to severity of brain injury in litigants.韦氏成人智力量表第三版在诉讼当事人脑损伤严重程度方面的研究结果。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 May;17(2):273-84. doi: 10.1076/clin.17.2.273.16499.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute axon damage and demyelination are mitigated by 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) therapy after experimental traumatic brain injury.急性轴索损伤和脱髓鞘经实验性颅脑损伤后 4-氨基吡啶(4-AP)治疗得到缓解。
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2022 May 2;10(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40478-022-01366-z.
2
King-Devick Test Performance and Cognitive Dysfunction after Concussion: A Pilot Eye Movement Study.脑震荡后的King-Devick测试表现与认知功能障碍:一项眼动研究试点
Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 27;11(12):1571. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11121571.
3
Traumatic Brain Injury: Ultrastructural Features in Neuronal Ferroptosis, Glial Cell Activation and Polarization, and Blood-Brain Barrier Breakdown.
创伤性脑损伤:神经元铁死亡、神经胶质细胞激活和极化以及血脑屏障破坏的超微结构特征。
Cells. 2021 Apr 24;10(5):1009. doi: 10.3390/cells10051009.
4
Exploring Traumatic Brain Injuries and Aggressive Antisocial Behaviors in Young Male Violent Offenders.探究年轻男性暴力罪犯的创伤性脑损伤与攻击性反社会行为
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 9;11:507196. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.507196. eCollection 2020.
5
Cognitive Decline in Korean Patients with Neurocognitive Disorder due to Traumatic Brain Injury: A Control for Premorbid Intelligence.韩国创伤性脑损伤所致神经认知障碍患者的认知衰退:病前智力的对照研究
Psychiatry Investig. 2019 Dec;16(12):889-895. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.0129. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
6
A Cross-Study Analysis for Reproducible Sub-classification of Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤可重复性亚分类的跨研究分析
Front Neurol. 2018 Aug 13;9:606. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00606. eCollection 2018.
7
Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury Identifies Distinct Early and Late Phase Axonal Conduction Deficits of White Matter Pathophysiology, and Reveals Intervening Recovery.实验性创伤性脑损伤确定了白质病理生理学的明显早期和晚期阶段轴突传导缺陷,并揭示了干预后的恢复。
J Neurosci. 2018 Oct 10;38(41):8723-8736. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0819-18.2018. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
8
Sub-classifying patients with mild traumatic brain injury: A clustering approach based on baseline clinical characteristics and 90-day and 180-day outcomes.对轻度创伤性脑损伤患者进行亚分类:一种基于基线临床特征以及 90 天和 180 天结局的聚类方法。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 11;13(7):e0198741. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198741. eCollection 2018.
9
Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in individuals with traumatic brain injury.在创伤性脑损伤个体中使用 NIH 工具包认知电池(NIHTB-CB)。
Rehabil Psychol. 2017 Nov;62(4):413-424. doi: 10.1037/rep0000174.
10
Repeated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Potential Mechanisms of Damage.重复轻度创伤性脑损伤:潜在的损伤机制。
Cell Transplant. 2017 Jul;26(7):1131-1155. doi: 10.1177/0963689717714092.