Suppr超能文献

危重症患者血糖控制指南是否应个体化?:权衡随机和观察性研究的证据

Should guidelines for glycemic control of the critically ill be individualized?: Weighing the evidence from randomized and observational investigations.

作者信息

Krinsley James S

机构信息

Director of Critical Care, Stamford Hospital, Stamford, CT; Clinical Professor of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.

出版信息

Hosp Pract (1995). 2014 Apr;42(2):14-22. doi: 10.3810/hp.2014.04.1099.

Abstract

The monitoring of blood glucose and treatment of hyperglycemia has been a standard of care in intensive care units since the publication of a single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) of intensive insulin therapy in 2001 that demonstrated marked improvements in mortality. Professional societies created guidelines based on the results of this investigation, and revised them based on the results of a very small group of RCTs that followed. This commentary reviews the weight of evidence provided by the RCTs in comparison to the large body of evidence from observational studies regarding glycemic control of the critically ill, and suggests that the totality of evidence should be considered in the formulation of clinical practice paradigms.

摘要

自2001年一项关于强化胰岛素治疗的单中心随机对照试验(RCT)发表以来,血糖监测和高血糖治疗一直是重症监护病房的护理标准,该试验证明死亡率有显著改善。专业学会根据这项调查的结果制定了指南,并根据随后一小部分RCT的结果进行了修订。本评论回顾了RCT所提供的证据权重,并与关于危重症患者血糖控制的大量观察性研究证据进行比较,建议在制定临床实践模式时应考虑全部证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验