Suppr超能文献

持续静脉输注常规胰岛素与单剂量皮下注射甘精胰岛素在医学重症患者中血糖控制情况的比较

Comparison of Glycemic Control between Continuous Regular Insulin Infusion and Single-dose Subcutaneous Insulin Glargine Injection in Medical Critically Ill Patients.

作者信息

Bhurayanontachai Rungsun, Rattanaprapat Tharittamon, Kongkamol Chanon

机构信息

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.

出版信息

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar;22(3):174-179. doi: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_273_17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study aimed to compare glycemic control between continuous intravenous regular insulin infusion and single-dose subcutaneous insulin glargine injection in medical critically ill patients.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A prospective noninferiority study was conducted in medical critically ill patients who developed hyperglycemia and required regular insulin infusion by the Intensive Care Unit glycemic control protocol. The eligible patients were switched from the daily regular insulin requirement to single-dose subcutaneous insulin glargine injection by a 100% conversion dose. Arterial blood glucose was checked every 2 h for 24 h. Success cases were blood glucose levels of 80-200 mg/dL during the study period. The mean time-averaged area under the curves (AUCs) of blood glucose levels between the two types of insulin were compared by -test.

RESULTS

Of 20 cases, 14 cases (70%) were successful. The mean time-averaged AUCs of blood glucose levels between the two types of insulin were not significantly different (155.91 ± 27.54 mg/dL vs. 151.70 ± 17.07 mg/dL, = 0.56) and less than the predefined noninferior margin. No severe hypoglycemic cases were detected during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-dose subcutaneous insulin glargine injection was feasibly applied for glycemic control in medical critically ill patients. The glycemic control in the critically ill patients by a single dose of subcutaneous insulin glargine was comparable to standard intravenous regular insulin infusion. A conversion dose of 100% of the daily requirement of regular insulin is suggested.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在比较持续静脉输注普通胰岛素与单剂量皮下注射甘精胰岛素在内科危重症患者中的血糖控制情况。

对象与方法

对因重症监护病房血糖控制方案而出现高血糖且需要常规胰岛素输注的内科危重症患者进行一项前瞻性非劣效性研究。符合条件的患者按照100%转换剂量从每日所需的常规胰岛素转换为单剂量皮下注射甘精胰岛素。在24小时内每2小时检查一次动脉血糖。成功病例是指研究期间血糖水平为80 - 200mg/dL。通过t检验比较两种胰岛素之间血糖水平的平均时间平均曲线下面积(AUCs)。

结果

20例患者中,14例(70%)成功。两种胰岛素之间血糖水平的平均时间平均AUCs无显著差异(155.91±27.54mg/dL对151.70±17.07mg/dL,P = 0.56)且低于预先定义的非劣效界值。研究期间未检测到严重低血糖病例。

结论

单剂量皮下注射甘精胰岛素可有效地用于内科危重症患者的血糖控制。单剂量皮下注射甘精胰岛素对危重症患者的血糖控制与标准静脉输注普通胰岛素相当。建议采用每日所需常规胰岛素100%的转换剂量。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Glycemic variability and outcome in critically ill.危重症患者的血糖变异性与预后
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014 May;18(5):285-90. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.132484.
6
Glycemic control in critically ill: A moving target.危重症患者的血糖控制:一个动态目标。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr;18(4):229-33. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.130574.
8
Glycemic control in critically ill patients.危重症患者的血糖控制
World J Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb 4;1(1):31-9. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v1.i1.31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验