Krinsley James Stephen
Stamford Hospital - Medicine/Critical Care, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons , Stamford, CT , USA.
Hosp Pract (1995). 2015;43(3):191-7. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2015.1066227.
Since publication of the Normoglycemia in Intensive Care Evaluation - Survival Using Glucose Algorithm Regulation trial in 2009, demonstrating increased 90-day mortality in a large cohort of critically ill patients treated with the intensive, rather than moderate blood glucose (BG) target, enthusiasm has dampened for 'tight glucose control' in intensive care units. Nevertheless, a burgeoning literature has clarified limitations of the interventional trials of intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill and explored key clinical aspects of glycemic control in this population. This review provides an overview of the last 6 years of research in this field. Topics include advances in understanding the domains of glycemic control - hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia and glucose variability; the role of diabetic status in modulating the relationship of these domains of control to mortality; the importance of premorbid glucose control in patients with diabetes; the central role that measurement frequency has in determining success in achieving desired BG control and, finally, new data exploring time in targeted BG range, a potentially 'unifying' metric.
自2009年《重症监护中血糖正常化评估——使用血糖算法调节的生存情况》试验发表以来,该试验表明,在一大批接受强化而非适度血糖(BG)目标治疗的重症患者中,90天死亡率有所增加,重症监护病房对“严格血糖控制”的热情有所降温。尽管如此,大量文献已经阐明了重症患者强化胰岛素治疗干预试验的局限性,并探讨了该人群血糖控制的关键临床方面。本综述概述了该领域过去6年的研究情况。主题包括在理解血糖控制领域——高血糖、低血糖和血糖变异性方面的进展;糖尿病状态在调节这些控制领域与死亡率关系中的作用;糖尿病患者病前血糖控制的重要性;测量频率在确定实现理想BG控制成功与否方面的核心作用,以及最后,探索目标BG范围内时间的新数据,这是一个潜在的“统一”指标。