Yasaka Koichiro, Katsura Masaki, Akahane Masaaki, Sato Jiro, Matsuda Izuru, Ohtomo Kuni
Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Jul;83(7):1063-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.03.032. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
To determine whether dose-reduced CT with model-based iterative image reconstruction (MBIR) is a useful tool with which to diagnose hepatic steatosis.
This prospective clinical study approved by our Institutional Review Board included 103 (67 men and 36 women; mean age, 64.3 years) patients who provided written informed consent to undergo unenhanced CT. Images of reference-dose CT (RDCT) with filtered back projection (R-FBP) and low- and ultralow-dose CT (dose-length product; 24 and 9% of that of RDCT) with MBIR (L-MBIR and UL-MBIR) were reconstructed. Mean CT numbers of liver (CT[L]) and spleen (CT[S]), and quotient (CT[L/S]) of CT[L] and CT[S] were calculated from selected regions of interest. Bias and limits of agreement (LOA) of CT[L] and CT[L/S] in L-MBIR and UL-MBIR (vs. R-FBP) were assessed using Bland-Altman analyses. Diagnostic methods for hepatic steatosis of CT[L]<48 Hounsfield units (HU) and CT[L/S]<1.1 were applied to L-MBIR and UL-MBIR using R-FBP as the reference standard.
Bias was larger for CT[L] in UL-MBIR than in L-MBIR (-3.18HU vs. -1.73HU). The LOA of CT[L/S] was larger for UL-MBIR than for L-MBIR (±0.425 vs. ±0.245) and outliers were identified in CT[L/S] of UL-MBIR. Accuracy (0.92-0.95) and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.976-0.992) were high for each method, but some were slightly lower in UL-MBIR than L-MBIR.
Dose-reduced CT reconstructed with MBIR is applicable to diagnose hepatic steatosis, however, a low dose of radiation might be preferable.
确定采用基于模型的迭代图像重建(MBIR)的低剂量CT是否是诊断肝脂肪变性的有用工具。
本前瞻性临床研究经机构审查委员会批准,纳入了103例患者(67例男性和36例女性;平均年龄64.3岁),这些患者均提供了书面知情同意书,接受非增强CT检查。重建了采用滤波反投影(R-FBP)的参考剂量CT(RDCT)图像以及采用MBIR的低剂量和超低剂量CT(剂量长度乘积分别为RDCT的24%和9%)图像(L-MBIR和UL-MBIR)。从选定的感兴趣区域计算肝脏(CT[L])和脾脏(CT[S])的平均CT值以及CT[L]与CT[S]的商(CT[L/S])。使用Bland-Altman分析评估L-MBIR和UL-MBIR中CT[L]和CT[L/S]相对于R-FBP的偏差和一致性界限(LOA)。以R-FBP作为参考标准,将CT[L]<48亨氏单位(HU)和CT[L/S]<1.1的肝脂肪变性诊断方法应用于L-MBIR和UL-MBIR。
UL-MBIR中CT[L] 的偏差大于L-MBIR(-3.18HU对-1.73HU)。UL-MBIR中CT[L/S]的LOA大于L-MBIR(±0.425对±0.245),并且在UL-MBIR的CT[L/S]中发现了离群值。每种方法的准确性(0.92 - 0.95)和受试者操作特征曲线下面积(0.976 - 0.992)都很高,但UL-MBIR中的一些指标略低于L-MBIR。
采用MBIR重建的低剂量CT适用于诊断肝脂肪变性,然而,较低剂量的辐射可能更可取。