• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期癌症患者及其主要照顾者对临终关怀/姑息治疗的态度及其对实际利用情况的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Terminal cancer patients' and their primary caregivers' attitudes toward hospice/palliative care and their effects on actual utilization: A prospective cohort study.

作者信息

An Ah Reum, Lee June-Koo, Yun Young Ho, Heo Dae Seog

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2014 Jul;28(7):976-985. doi: 10.1177/0269216314531312. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1177/0269216314531312
PMID:24781817
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies on hospice/palliative care indicated that patients' socio-demographic factors, disease status, and availability of health-care resources were associated with hospice/palliative care utilization. However, the impact of family caregivers on hospice/palliative care utilization has not been thoroughly investigated.

AIM

To evaluate the association between attitudes toward hospice/palliative care of both patients with terminal cancer (defined as progressive, advanced cancer in which the patient will die within months) and their family caregivers and utilization of inpatient hospice/palliative care facilities.

DESIGN

A prospective observational cohort study was performed in 12 hospitals in South Korea. Attitude toward hospice/palliative care was assessed immediately after terminal cancer diagnosis. After the patient's death, caregivers were interviewed whether they utilized hospice/palliative care facilities.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 359 patient-caregiver dyads completed baseline questionnaires. After the patients' death, 257 caregivers were interviewed.

RESULTS

At the baseline questionnaire, 137/359 (38.2%) patients and 185/359 (51.5%) of caregivers preferred hospice/palliative care. Preference for hospice/palliative care was associated with awareness of terminal status among both patients (adjusted odds ratio: 1.87, 95% confidence interval: 1.16-3.03) and caregivers (adjusted odds ratio: 2.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.20-3.81). Religion, metastasis, and poor performance status were also independently associated with patient preference for hospice/palliative care. At the post-bereavement interview, 104/257 (40.5%) caregivers responded that they utilized hospice/palliative care facilities. Caregiver's preferences for hospice/palliative care were significantly associated with actual utilization (adjusted odds ratio: 2.67, 95% confidence interval: 1.53-4.67). No patient-related factors were associated with hospice/palliative care utilization.

CONCLUSION

Promoting awareness of prognosis and to improve communication between doctors and families is important for facilitating the use of hospice/palliative care.

摘要

背景

先前关于临终关怀/姑息治疗的研究表明,患者的社会人口学因素、疾病状况以及医疗资源的可及性与临终关怀/姑息治疗的利用相关。然而,家庭照护者对临终关怀/姑息治疗利用的影响尚未得到充分研究。

目的

评估晚期癌症患者(定义为病情进展、处于晚期且患者将在数月内死亡的癌症)及其家庭照护者对临终关怀/姑息治疗的态度与住院临终关怀/姑息治疗设施利用之间的关联。

设计

在韩国的12家医院进行了一项前瞻性观察队列研究。在晚期癌症诊断后立即评估对临终关怀/姑息治疗的态度。患者死亡后,对照护者进行访谈,询问他们是否使用了临终关怀/姑息治疗设施。

参与者

共有359对患者-照护者二元组完成了基线问卷。患者死亡后,对257名照护者进行了访谈。

结果

在基线问卷中,137/359(38.2%)的患者和185/359(51.5%)的照护者倾向于临终关怀/姑息治疗。对临终关怀/姑息治疗的偏好与患者(调整后的优势比:1.87,95%置信区间:1.16 - 3.03)和照护者(调整后的优势比:2.14,95%置信区间:1.20 - 3.81)对终末期状态的认知相关。宗教信仰、转移和较差的体能状态也与患者对临终关怀/姑息治疗的偏好独立相关。在丧亲后访谈中,104/257(40.5%)的照护者表示他们使用了临终关怀/姑息治疗设施。照护者对临终关怀/姑息治疗的偏好与实际利用显著相关(调整后的优势比:2.67,95%置信区间:1.53 - 4.67)。没有患者相关因素与临终关怀/姑息治疗的利用相关。

结论

提高对预后的认知并改善医生与家庭之间的沟通对于促进临终关怀/姑息治疗的使用很重要。

相似文献

1
Terminal cancer patients' and their primary caregivers' attitudes toward hospice/palliative care and their effects on actual utilization: A prospective cohort study.晚期癌症患者及其主要照顾者对临终关怀/姑息治疗的态度及其对实际利用情况的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jul;28(7):976-985. doi: 10.1177/0269216314531312. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
2
Length of hospice enrollment and subsequent depression in family caregivers: 13-month follow-up study.临终关怀注册时长与家庭照顾者随后出现的抑郁:13个月随访研究
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;14(3):264-9. doi: 10.1097/01.JGP.0000194642.86116.ce.
3
Cancer family caregivers during the palliative, hospice, and bereavement phases: a review of the descriptive psychosocial literature.癌症患者家庭照护者在姑息治疗、临终关怀和丧亲阶段:描述性心理社会文献综述。
Palliat Support Care. 2011 Sep;9(3):315-25. doi: 10.1017/S1478951511000265.
4
Factors associated with place of death in koprean patients with terminal cancer.韩国晚期癌症患者死亡地点的相关因素。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(12):7309-14.
5
Association between the emotional status of family caregivers and length of stay in a palliative care unit: A retrospective study.姑息治疗病房中家庭照顾者的情绪状态与住院时间的关联:一项回顾性研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Dec;13(6):1695-700. doi: 10.1017/S1478951515000619. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
6
Predictors of the final place of care of patients with advanced cancer receiving integrated home-based palliative care: a retrospective cohort study.接受综合家庭姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者最终护理地点的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Oct 18;20(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00865-5.
7
Quality of life, day hospice needs, and satisfaction of community-dwelling patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers in Japan.日本社区晚期癌症患者及其照护者的生活质量、日间临终关怀需求与满意度
J Palliat Med. 2008 Nov;11(9):1203-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2008.0067.
8
The influence of familial factors on the choice of the place of death for terminally ill breast cancer patients: a retrospective single-center study.家族因素对晚期乳腺癌患者死亡地点选择的影响:一项回顾性单中心研究
Breast Cancer. 2016 Sep;23(5):797-806. doi: 10.1007/s12282-015-0643-6. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
9
Depression among surviving caregivers: does length of hospice enrollment matter?幸存护理人员中的抑郁情绪:临终关怀登记时长有影响吗?
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;161(12):2257-62. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.12.2257.
10
Impact of availability of an inpatient hospice unit on the parent hospital's quality of palliative care for Taiwanese cancer decedents, 2001-2006.2001-2006 年,临终关怀病房的可及性对台湾癌症死亡患者父母所在医院姑息治疗质量的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Sep;42(3):400-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.12.011. Epub 2011 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing accessibility of palliative care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.影响姑息治疗可及性的因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 24;24(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01704-7.
2
What outcomes do studies use to measure the impact of prognostication on people with advanced cancer? Findings from a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.研究使用哪些结果来衡量预后对晚期癌症患者的影响?一项对定量和定性研究的系统评价结果。
Palliat Med. 2023 Oct;37(9):1345-1364. doi: 10.1177/02692163231191148. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
3
Decision-making in palliative care: patient and family caregiver concordance and discordance-systematic review and narrative synthesis.
姑息治疗中的决策制定:患者和家庭照护者的一致性和不一致性——系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Dec;13(4):374-385. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003525. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
4
Factors Influencing the Willingness of Palliative Care Utilization among the Older Population with Active Cancers: A Case Study in Mandalay, Myanmar.影响癌症活跃老年人群姑息治疗意愿的因素:缅甸曼德勒的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 26;18(15):7887. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157887.
5
Evolving Definitions of Palliative Care: Upstream Migration or Confusion?不断演变的姑息治疗定义:上游迁移还是混淆?
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2020 Feb 11;21(3):20. doi: 10.1007/s11864-020-0716-4.
6
Attitudes toward early palliative care in cancer patients and caregivers: a Korean nationwide survey.癌症患者及其照护者对早期姑息治疗的态度:一项韩国全国性调查。
Cancer Med. 2018 May;7(5):1784-1793. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1441. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
7
The Effect of Hospice Consultation on Aggressive Treatment of Lung Cancer.临终关怀咨询对肺癌积极治疗的影响。
Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jul;50(3):720-728. doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.169. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
8
Palliative and end-of-life care issues in chronic kidney disease.慢性肾脏病中的姑息治疗与临终关怀问题
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2015 Mar;9(1):14-9. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000110.