• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空间特征的共同表征驱动行动和感知:在试验中抓取和判断物体特征。

A common representation of spatial features drives action and perception: grasping and judging object features within trials.

作者信息

Christiansen Jens H, Christensen Jeppe, Grünbaum Thor, Kyllingsbæk Søren

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Media, Communication, and Cognition, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 May 2;9(5):e94744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094744. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0094744
PMID:24788941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4008498/
Abstract

Spatial features of an object can be specified using two different response types: either by use of symbols or motorically by directly acting upon the object. Is this response dichotomy reflected in a dual representation of the visual world: one for perception and one for action? Previously, symbolic and motoric responses, specifying location, has been shown to rely on a common representation. What about more elaborate features such as length and orientation? Here we show that when motoric and symbolic responses are made within the same trial, the probability of making the same symbolic and motoric response is well above chance for both length and orientation. This suggests that motoric and symbolic responses to length and orientation are driven by a common representation. We also show that, for both response types, the spatial features of an object are processed independently. This finding of matching object-processing characteristics is also in agreement with the idea of a common representation driving both response types.

摘要

一个物体的空间特征可以通过两种不同的反应类型来指定

要么使用符号,要么通过直接作用于物体以运动方式来指定。这种反应二分法是否反映在视觉世界的双重表征中:一种用于感知,一种用于行动?此前,已表明指定位置的符号和运动反应依赖于共同的表征。那么像长度和方向这样更精细的特征呢?在这里我们表明,当在同一试验中做出运动和符号反应时,对于长度和方向而言,做出相同符号和运动反应的概率远高于随机概率。这表明对长度和方向的运动和符号反应是由共同的表征驱动的。我们还表明,对于这两种反应类型,物体的空间特征都是独立处理的。这种匹配的物体处理特征的发现也与驱动这两种反应类型的共同表征的观点一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30a4/4008498/1398b234544b/pone.0094744.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30a4/4008498/2b6eb6659e20/pone.0094744.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30a4/4008498/db748a1137b1/pone.0094744.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30a4/4008498/c003b36c50b8/pone.0094744.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30a4/4008498/780f40b90ed2/pone.0094744.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30a4/4008498/492872e08726/pone.0094744.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30a4/4008498/1398b234544b/pone.0094744.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30a4/4008498/2b6eb6659e20/pone.0094744.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30a4/4008498/db748a1137b1/pone.0094744.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30a4/4008498/c003b36c50b8/pone.0094744.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30a4/4008498/780f40b90ed2/pone.0094744.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30a4/4008498/492872e08726/pone.0094744.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30a4/4008498/1398b234544b/pone.0094744.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
A common representation of spatial features drives action and perception: grasping and judging object features within trials.空间特征的共同表征驱动行动和感知:在试验中抓取和判断物体特征。
PLoS One. 2014 May 2;9(5):e94744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094744. eCollection 2014.
2
Effects of irrelevant stimulus orientation on visually guided grasping movements.无关刺激方向对视觉引导抓握动作的影响。
Behav Neurosci. 2007 Apr;121(2):301-9. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.121.2.301.
3
Context and hand posture modulate the neural dynamics of tool-object perception.语境和手势调节工具-物体感知的神经动力学。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Feb;51(3):506-19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.12.003. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
4
How action performance affects object perception.动作表现如何影响物体感知。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Jul;237(7):1805-1810. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05547-6. Epub 2019 May 3.
5
Processing of visual signals for direct specification of motor targets and for conceptual representation of action targets in the dorsal and ventral premotor cortex.背侧和腹侧前运动皮层中视觉信号的处理,用于直接指定运动目标和用于动作目标的概念表示。
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;102(6):3280-94. doi: 10.1152/jn.00452.2009. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
6
Feature-location binding in 3D: Feature judgments are biased by 2D location but not position-in-depth.三维空间中的特征-位置绑定:特征判断受二维位置而非深度位置的影响。
Vision Res. 2016 Oct;127:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
7
Impact of action planning on visual and body perception in a virtual grasping task.动作规划对虚拟抓握任务中视觉和本体感知的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Sep;237(9):2431-2445. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05601-3. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
8
The mutual roles of action representations and spatial deictics in French language.动作表征与空间指示词在法语中的相互作用
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(11):2187-203. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.775596. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
9
Correspondence effects with torches: grasping affordance or visual feature asymmetry?与手电筒的对应效应:把握可供性还是视觉特征不对称?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(4):665-75. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.824996. Epub 2013 Aug 25.
10
Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space.物体在何处引发动作?对空间可供性的研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Nov;207(1-2):95-103. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2435-8. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND.把握遵循韦伯定律:如何使用反应变异性作为 JND 的代理。
J Vis. 2022 Nov 1;22(12):13. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.12.13.
2
Weber's law in 2D and 3D grasping.二维和三维抓取中的韦伯定律。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):977-988. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0913-3. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
3
Grasping a 2D object: terminal haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration.抓取二维物体:终端触觉反馈支持绝对视觉-触觉校准。

本文引用的文献

1
Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action?我们是否拥有用于感知和行动的独立视觉流?
Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Mar;1(1):52-62. doi: 10.1080/17588920903388950. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
2
Does grasping in patient D.F. depend on vision?患者 D.F.的抓握能力是否依赖于视觉?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 May;16(5):256-7; discussion 258-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
3
No dissociation between perception and action in patient DF when haptic feedback is withdrawn.当触觉反馈被撤回时,患者 DF 不存在感知和动作的分离。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Apr;234(4):945-54. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4521-4. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
4
Pantomime-grasping: the 'return' of haptic feedback supports the absolute specification of object size.手势抓握:触觉反馈的“回归”支持对物体大小的绝对确定。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Jul;233(7):2029-40. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4274-0. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
J Neurosci. 2012 Feb 8;32(6):2013-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3413-11.2012.
4
Vision-for-perception and vision-for-action: which model is compatible with the available psychophysical and neuropsychological data?感知视觉与行动视觉:哪种模型与现有的心理物理学和神经心理学数据相兼容?
Vision Res. 2011 Apr 22;51(8):812-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
5
Converging evidence for diverging pathways: neuropsychology and psychophysics tell the same story.不同路径的汇聚证据:神经心理学与心理物理学讲述着相同的故事。
Vision Res. 2011 Apr 22;51(8):804-11. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.014. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
6
Grasping remembered objects: exponential decay of the visual memory.抓取记忆中的物体:视觉记忆的指数衰减。
Vision Res. 2010 Dec;50(24):2642-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.026. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
7
Transforming vision into action.将愿景转化为行动。
Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1567-87. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.027. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
8
On the perceptual/motor dissociation: a review of concepts, theory, experimental paradigms and data interpretations.关于感知/运动分离:概念、理论、实验范式及数据解读综述
Seeing Perceiving. 2010;23(2):89-151. doi: 10.1163/187847510X503588.
9
When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.抓握动作何时会受到缪勒-莱尔错觉的影响?一项定量综述。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 May;47(6):1421-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.031. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
10
Visual coding for action violates fundamental psychophysical principles.用于行动的视觉编码违背了基本的心理物理学原理。
Curr Biol. 2008 Jul 22;18(14):R599-601. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.052.