Ikemoto I, Machida T, Oishi Y, Onishi T, Shirai T, Imanaka K
Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine.
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1989 Sep;35(9):1639-42.
The usefulness of a newly developed prostatic acid phosphatase assay based on the immunoenzymatic method (PAP-IEA) was studied. Serum samples were obtained from 22 untreated prostatic carcinoma patients, 34 benign prostatic hyperplasia patients, 32 prostatic disease-free patients and 27 normal volunteers. Mean +/- S.D. of PAP-IEA in prostatic disease-free group and normal volunteer group was 0.46 +/- 0.27 ng/ml. So, the upper limit of PAP-IEA for clinical normal range was set to 1 ng/ml (= Mean + 2S.D.). Thus, the false positive rate of benign prostatic hyperplasia was estimated at 9% and false negative rate of untreated prostatic carcinoma at 27%. Meanwhile, PAP-IEA values measured in this study were correlated well to PAP-RIA values measured in the same samples (r = 0.994).
对一种基于免疫酶法新开发的前列腺酸性磷酸酶检测方法(PAP - IEA)的实用性进行了研究。从22例未经治疗的前列腺癌患者、34例良性前列腺增生患者、32例无前列腺疾病患者和27名正常志愿者中获取血清样本。无前列腺疾病组和正常志愿者组中PAP - IEA的平均值±标准差为0.46±0.27 ng/ml。因此,临床正常范围的PAP - IEA上限设定为1 ng/ml(=平均值 + 2倍标准差)。由此估计,良性前列腺增生的假阳性率为9%,未经治疗的前列腺癌的假阴性率为27%。同时,本研究中测得的PAP - IEA值与同一样本中测得的PAP - RIA值具有良好的相关性(r = 0.994)。