Wallis Carole L, Aga Evgenia, Ribaudo Heather, Saravanan Shanmugam, Norton Michael, Stevens Wendy, Kumarasamy Nagalingeswaran, Bartlett John, Katzenstein David
Lancet Laboratories, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Statistical Data Analysis Center, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Sep 1;59(5):706-15. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu314. Epub 2014 May 1.
The development of drug resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) has been associated with baseline human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 RNA level (VL), CD4 cell counts (CD4), subtype, and treatment failure duration. This study describes drug resistance and levels of susceptibility after first-line virologic failure in individuals from Thailand, South Africa, India, Malawi, Tanzania.
CD4 and VL were captured at AIDs Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) A5230 study entry, a study of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy after first-line virologic failure on an NNRTI regimen. HIV drug-resistance mutation associations with subtype, site, study entry VL, and CD4 were evaluated using Fisher exact and Kruskall-Wallis tests.
Of the 207 individuals who were screened for A5230, sequence data were available for 148 individuals. Subtypes observed: subtype C (n = 97, 66%) AE (n = 27, 18%), A1 (n = 12, 8%), and D (n = 10, 7%). Of the 148 individuals, 93% (n = 138) and 96% (n = 142) had at least 1 reverse transcriptase (RT) mutation associated with NRTI and NNRTI resistance, respectively. The number of NRTI mutations was significantly associated with a higher study screening VL and lower study screening CD4 (P < .001). Differences in drug-resistance patterns in both NRTI and NNRTI were observed by site.
The degree of NNRTI and NRTI resistance after first-line virologic failure was associated with higher VL at study entry. Thirty-two percent of individuals remained fully susceptible to etravirine and rilpivirine, protease inhibitor resistance was rare. Some level of susceptibility to NRTI remained; however, VL monitoring and earlier virologic failure detection may result in lower NRTI resistance.
对核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTIs)和非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTIs)的耐药性发展与基线人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)-1 RNA水平(VL)、CD4细胞计数(CD4)、亚型以及治疗失败持续时间有关。本研究描述了来自泰国、南非、印度、马拉维、坦桑尼亚的个体在一线病毒学失败后的耐药性及药敏水平。
在艾滋病临床试验组(ACTG)A5230研究入组时采集CD4和VL数据,该研究是关于在NNRTI方案一线病毒学失败后使用洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/r)单药治疗。使用Fisher精确检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验评估HIV耐药突变与亚型、地点、研究入组时的VL和CD4之间的关联。
在为A5230研究筛查的207名个体中,有148名个体可获得序列数据。观察到的亚型:C亚型(n = 97,66%)、AE亚型(n = 27,18%)、A1亚型(n = 12,8%)和D亚型(n = 10,7%)。在这148名个体中,分别有93%(n = 138)和96%(n = 142)至少有1个与NRTI和NNRTI耐药相关的逆转录酶(RT)突变。NRTI突变的数量与更高的研究筛查VL和更低的研究筛查CD4显著相关(P <.001)。在NRTI和NNRTI中,耐药模式在不同地点均有差异。
一线病毒学失败后NNRTI和NRTI的耐药程度与研究入组时更高的VL有关。32%的个体对依曲韦林和利匹韦林仍完全敏感,蛋白酶抑制剂耐药罕见。对NRTI仍存在一定程度的敏感性;然而,VL监测和更早检测到病毒学失败可能会降低NRTI耐药性。