Kityo Cissy, Thompson Jennifer, Nankya Immaculate, Hoppe Anne, Ndashimye Emmanuel, Warambwa Colin, Mambule Ivan, van Oosterhout Joep J, Wools-Kaloustian Kara, Bertagnolio Silvia, Easterbrook Philippa J, Mugyenyi Peter, Walker A Sarah, Paton Nicholas I
*Joint Clinical Research Centre (JCRC), Kampala, Uganda; †MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom; ‡University of Zimbabwe Clinical Research Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe; §Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda; ‖Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi; ¶Dignitas International, Zomba, Malawi; #Department of Medicine, Moi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya; **World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland; and ‡‡Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Jun 1;75(2):e45-e54. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001285.
To determine drug resistance mutation (DRM) patterns in a large cohort of patients failing nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based first-line antiretroviral therapy regimens in programs without routine viral load (VL) monitoring and to examine intersubtype differences in DRMs.
Sequences from 787 adults/adolescents who failed an NNRTI-based first-line regimen in 13 clinics in Uganda, Kenya, Zimbabwe, and Malawi were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between specific DRMs and Stanford intermediate-/high-level resistance and factors including REGA subtype, first-line antiretroviral therapy drugs, CD4, and VL at failure.
The median first-line treatment duration was 4 years (interquartile range 30-43 months); 42% of participants had VL ≥100,000 copies/mL and 63% participants had CD4 <100 cells/mm. Viral subtype distribution was A1 (40%; Uganda and Kenya), C (31%; Zimbabwe and Malawi), and D (25%; Uganda and Kenya), and recombinant/unclassified (5%). In general, DRMs were more common in subtype-C than in subtype-A and/or subtype-D (nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor mutations K65R and Q151M; NNRTI mutations E138A, V106M, Y181C, K101E, and H221Y). The presence of tenofovir resistance was similar between subtypes [P (adjusted) = 0.32], but resistance to zidovudine, abacavir, etravirine, or rilpivirine was more common in subtype-C than in subtype-D/subtype-A [P (adjusted) < 0.02].
Non-B subtypes differ in DRMs at first-line failure, which impacts on residual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and NNRTI susceptibility. In particular, higher rates of etravirine and rilpivirine resistance in subtype-C may limit their potential utility in salvage regimens.
在没有常规病毒载量(VL)监测的项目中,确定大量接受基于非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTI)的一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案失败的患者的耐药性突变(DRM)模式,并研究DRM的亚型间差异。
分析了来自乌干达、肯尼亚、津巴布韦和马拉维13家诊所中787名接受基于NNRTI的一线治疗方案失败的成人/青少年的序列。采用多变量逻辑回归确定特定DRM与斯坦福中级/高级耐药性之间的关联,以及包括REGA亚型、一线抗逆转录病毒治疗药物、CD4和失败时的VL等因素。
一线治疗的中位持续时间为4年(四分位间距30 - 43个月);42%的参与者病毒载量≥100,000拷贝/mL,63%的参与者CD4<100细胞/mm³。病毒亚型分布为A1(40%;乌干达和肯尼亚)、C(31%;津巴布韦和马拉维)、D(25%;乌干达和肯尼亚)以及重组/未分类(5%)。总体而言,DRM在C亚型中比在A和/或D亚型中更常见(核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂突变K65R和Q151M;NNRTI突变E138A、V V106M、Y181C、K101E和H221Y)。替诺福韦耐药性在各亚型中的存在情况相似[校正P = 0.32],但齐多夫定、阿巴卡韦、依曲韦林或rilpivirine的耐药性在C亚型中比在D/A亚型中更常见[校正P<0.02]。
非B亚型在一线治疗失败时的DRM存在差异,这影响了残留的核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂和NNRTI敏感性。特别是,C亚型中依曲韦林和rilpivirine耐药率较高,可能会限制它们在挽救治疗方案中的潜在效用。