• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

带有易出错协变量的逆概率加权法。

Inverse probability weighting with error-prone covariates.

作者信息

McCaffrey Daniel F, Lockwood J R, Setodji Claude M

机构信息

RAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

出版信息

Biometrika. 2013;100(3):671-680. doi: 10.1093/biomet/ast022.

DOI:10.1093/biomet/ast022
PMID:24795484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4006991/
Abstract

Inverse probability-weighted estimators are widely used in applications where data are missing due to nonresponse or censoring and in the estimation of causal effects from observational studies. Current estimators rely on ignorability assumptions for response indicators or treatment assignment and outcomes being conditional on observed covariates which are assumed to be measured without error. However, measurement error is common for the variables collected in many applications. For example, in studies of educational interventions, student achievement as measured by standardized tests is almost always used as the key covariate for removing hidden biases, but standardized test scores may have substantial measurement errors. We provide several expressions for a weighting function that can yield a consistent estimator for population means using incomplete data and covariates measured with error. We propose a method to estimate the weighting function from data. The results of a simulation study show that the estimator is consistent and has no bias and small variance.

摘要

逆概率加权估计器在因无应答或删失导致数据缺失的应用中以及在观测研究的因果效应估计中被广泛使用。当前的估计器依赖于响应指标或处理分配的可忽略性假设,以及结果以观测协变量为条件,而这些协变量被假定为无误差测量。然而,测量误差在许多应用中收集的变量中很常见。例如,在教育干预研究中,几乎总是使用标准化测试衡量的学生成绩作为消除隐藏偏差的关键协变量,但标准化测试分数可能存在大量测量误差。我们给出了一个加权函数的几种表达式,该函数可以使用不完整数据和有测量误差的协变量得出总体均值的一致估计器。我们提出了一种从数据中估计加权函数的方法。模拟研究结果表明,该估计器是一致的,无偏差且方差较小。

相似文献

1
Inverse probability weighting with error-prone covariates.带有易出错协变量的逆概率加权法。
Biometrika. 2013;100(3):671-680. doi: 10.1093/biomet/ast022.
2
Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.模型误设定和平均因果效应逆概率加权估计的偏差。
Biom J. 2023 Feb;65(2):e2100118. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100118. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
3
Covariate association eliminating weights: a unified weighting framework for causal effect estimation.协变量关联消除权重:用于因果效应估计的统一加权框架。
Biometrika. 2018 Sep 3;105(3):709-722. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asy015.
4
Causal inference with measurement error in outcomes: Bias analysis and estimation methods.结局测量误差下的因果推断:偏差分析与估计方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jul;28(7):2049-2068. doi: 10.1177/0962280217743777. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
5
Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.在观察性研究中,利用倾向得分采用治疗权重的逆概率(IPTW)估计因果治疗效果时,朝着最佳实践迈进。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 10;34(28):3661-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.6607. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
6
Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores in Estimating Counterfactual Survival Functions via the Overlap Weights.通过重叠权重解决极端倾向评分对反事实生存函数估计的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 May 20;191(6):1140-1151. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac043.
7
Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator.通过应用逆概率删失加权估计量对常规结局监测数据中的依存删失进行校正。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):323-335. doi: 10.1177/0962280216628900. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
8
Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.纵向观察性研究因果推断的工具变量与逆概率加权法
Stat Methods Med Res. 2004 Feb;13(1):17-48. doi: 10.1191/0962280204sm351ra.
9
Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?倾向评分分析与部分观测协变量:应如何使用多重插补?
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):3-19. doi: 10.1177/0962280217713032. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
10
Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.因果推断中的模型误设定与稳健性:比较匹配法和双重稳健估计。
Stat Med. 2012 Jul 10;31(15):1572-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.4496. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
AteMeVs: An R package for the estimation of the average treatment effect with measurement error and variable selection for confounders.AteMeVs:一个用于在存在测量误差和混杂因素变量选择情况下估计平均处理效应的 R 包。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 30;19(9):e0296951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296951. eCollection 2024.
2
Differential recall bias in estimating treatment effects in observational studies.在观察性研究中估计治疗效果时存在差异回忆偏倚。
Biometrics. 2024 Mar 27;80(2). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae058.
3
Targeted learning in observational studies with multi-valued treatments: An evaluation of antipsychotic drug treatment safety.多值治疗观察性研究中的靶向学习:抗精神病药物治疗安全性评估
Stat Med. 2024 Apr 15;43(8):1489-1508. doi: 10.1002/sim.10003. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
4
Estimation of the average treatment effect with variable selection and measurement error simultaneously addressed for potential confounders.同时针对潜在混杂因素进行变量选择和测量误差处理,估计平均处理效应。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Apr;32(4):691-711. doi: 10.1177/09622802221146308. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
5
Assessing Adverse Health Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Low Levels of Ambient Air Pollution: Implementation of Causal Inference Methods.评估长期暴露于低水平环境空气污染对健康的不良影响:因果推理方法的实施。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2022 Jan;2022(211):1-56.
6
Adolescent Police Stops, Self-Harm, and Attempted Suicide: Findings From the UK Millennium Cohort Study, 2012‒2019.青少年被警察拦截、自残和自杀未遂:来自英国千禧年队列研究的结果,2012-2019 年。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Oct;111(10):1885-1893. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306434. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
7
Exposure misclassification in propensity score-based time-to-event data analysis.基于倾向评分的生存数据分析中的暴露错误分类。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 May;30(5):1347-1357. doi: 10.1177/0962280221998410. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
8
Vector-based kernel weighting: A simple estimator for improving precision and bias of average treatment effects in multiple treatment settings.基于向量的核权估计:一种改进多处理环境下平均处理效应精度和偏差的简单估计量。
Stat Med. 2021 Feb 28;40(5):1204-1223. doi: 10.1002/sim.8836. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
9
Quantitative Bias Analysis for a Misclassified Confounder: A Comparison Between Marginal Structural Models and Conditional Models for Point Treatments.对有偏分类混杂因素的定量偏差分析:点治疗的边际结构模型与条件模型的比较。
Epidemiology. 2020 Nov;31(6):796-805. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001239.
10
Compensation and Amplification of Attenuation Bias in Causal Effect Estimates.因果效应估计中衰减偏倚的补偿和放大。
Psychometrika. 2019 Jun;84(2):589-610. doi: 10.1007/s11336-019-09665-6. Epub 2019 Mar 26.

本文引用的文献

1
A functional generalized method of moments approach for longitudinal studies with missing responses and covariate measurement error.一种用于具有缺失响应和协变量测量误差的纵向研究的功能性广义矩估计方法。
Biometrika. 2012;99(1):151-165. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asr076. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
2
Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research.倾向评分技术与测量协变量平衡评估在心理研究中测试因果关系。
Psychol Methods. 2010 Sep;15(3):234-49. doi: 10.1037/a0019623.
3
Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning.使用机器学习改进倾向评分加权。
Stat Med. 2010 Feb 10;29(3):337-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.3782.
4
Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.评论:揭开双重稳健性的神秘面纱:从不完整数据估计总体均值的替代策略比较。
Stat Sci. 2007;22(4):569-573. doi: 10.1214/07-STS227.
5
Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.缺失数据与因果推断模型中的双重稳健估计
Biometrics. 2005 Dec;61(4):962-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x.
6
Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies.使用增强回归进行倾向评分估计以评估观察性研究中的因果效应。
Psychol Methods. 2004 Dec;9(4):403-25. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.403.
7
Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study.在因果治疗效果估计中通过倾向得分进行分层和加权:一项比较研究。
Stat Med. 2004 Oct 15;23(19):2937-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.1903.
8
Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology.边缘结构模型与流行病学中的因果推断
Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):550-60. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00011.