U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America; Center for Marine and Environmental Studies, University of the Virgin Islands, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands, U.S. Virgin Islands; Centre for Marine and Coastal Policy Research, The Marine Institute, Marine Building, Plymouth University, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom.
U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 May 5;9(5):e96028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096028. eCollection 2014.
Coral reefs and associated fish populations have experienced rapid decline in the Caribbean region and marine protected areas (MPAs) have been widely implemented to address this decline. The performance of no-take MPAs (i.e., marine reserves) for protecting and rebuilding fish populations is influenced by the movement of animals within and across their boundaries. Very little is known about Caribbean reef fish movements creating a critical knowledge gap that can impede effective MPA design, performance and evaluation. Using miniature implanted acoustic transmitters and a fixed acoustic receiver array, we address three key questions: How far can reef fish move? Does connectivity exist between adjacent MPAs? Does existing MPA size match the spatial scale of reef fish movements? We show that many reef fishes are capable of traveling far greater distances and in shorter duration than was previously known. Across the Puerto Rican Shelf, more than half of our 163 tagged fish (18 species of 10 families) moved distances greater than 1 km with three fish moving more than 10 km in a single day and a quarter spending time outside of MPAs. We provide direct evidence of ecological connectivity across a network of MPAs, including estimated movements of more than 40 km connecting a nearshore MPA with a shelf-edge spawning aggregation. Most tagged fish showed high fidelity to MPAs, but also spent time outside MPAs, potentially contributing to spillover. Three-quarters of our fish were capable of traveling distances that would take them beyond the protection offered by at least 40-64% of the existing eastern Caribbean MPAs. We recommend that key species movement patterns be used to inform and evaluate MPA functionality and design, particularly size and shape. A re-scaling of our perception of Caribbean reef fish mobility and habitat use is imperative, with important implications for ecology and management effectiveness.
加勒比地区的珊瑚礁和相关鱼类种群数量迅速减少,为此广泛实施了海洋保护区(MPA)。 禁捕海洋保护区(即海洋保护区)在保护和重建鱼类种群方面的表现受到动物在其边界内和跨越边界的运动的影响。 关于加勒比珊瑚鱼的运动,我们知之甚少,这造成了一个关键的知识差距,可能会阻碍有效的 MPA 设计、表现和评估。 使用微型植入式声学发射器和固定声学接收器阵列,我们解决了三个关键问题:珊瑚鱼能移动多远?相邻的 MPA 之间是否存在连通性?现有的 MPA 大小是否与珊瑚鱼运动的空间尺度相匹配? 我们发现,许多珊瑚鱼能够比以前所知的更远和更短的时间内移动很远的距离。 在波多黎各大陆架上,我们标记的 163 条鱼中(10 个科的 18 个种)有一半以上移动的距离超过 1 公里,其中 3 条鱼在一天内移动超过 10 公里,四分之一的时间在 MPA 之外。 我们提供了跨越 MPA 网络的生态连通性的直接证据,包括估计有超过 40 公里的运动将近岸 MPA 与大陆架边缘产卵聚集区连接起来。 大多数标记的鱼对 MPA 表现出高度的忠诚,但也会在 MPA 之外花费时间,可能会产生外溢效应。 我们四分之三的鱼能够移动到超出至少 40-64%的现有东加勒比 MPA 提供的保护范围之外的距离。 我们建议使用关键物种的运动模式来为 MPA 的功能和设计提供信息和评估,特别是大小和形状。 我们必须重新调整对加勒比珊瑚鱼的运动性和栖息地利用的认识,这对生态学和管理效果有重要影响。