Suppr超能文献

监测互联网论坛,以评估对重新配方的奥施康定引入以遏制滥用的反应。

Monitoring of internet forums to evaluate reactions to the introduction of reformulated OxyContin to deter abuse.

作者信息

McNaughton Emily C, Coplan Paul M, Black Ryan A, Weber Sarah E, Chilcoat Howard D, Butler Stephen F

机构信息

Inflexxion, Inc., Newton, MA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2014 May 2;16(5):e119. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3397.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reformulating opioid analgesics to deter abuse is one approach toward improving their benefit-risk balance. To assess sentiment and attempts to defeat these products among difficult-to-reach populations of prescription drug abusers, evaluation of posts on Internet forums regarding reformulated products may be useful. A reformulated version of OxyContin (extended-release oxycodone) with physicochemical properties to deter abuse presented an opportunity to evaluate posts about the reformulation in online discussions.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to use messages on Internet forums to evaluate reactions to the introduction of reformulated OxyContin and to identify methods aimed to defeat the abuse-deterrent properties of the product.

METHODS

Posts collected from 7 forums between January 1, 2008 and September 30, 2013 were evaluated before and after the introduction of reformulated OxyContin on August 9, 2010. A quantitative evaluation of discussion levels across the study period and a qualitative coding of post content for OxyContin and 2 comparators for the 26 month period before and after OxyContin reformulation were conducted. Product endorsement was estimated for each product before and after reformulation as the ratio of endorsing-to-discouraging posts (ERo). Post-to-preintroduction period changes in ERos (ie, ratio of ERos) for each product were also calculated. Additionally, post content related to recipes for defeating reformulated OxyContin were evaluated from August 9, 2010 through September 2013.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 45,936 posts related to OxyContin, 18,685 to Vicodin (hydrocodone), and 23,863 to Dilaudid (hydromorphone) were identified. The proportion of OxyContin-related posts fluctuated between 6.35 and 8.25 posts per 1000 posts before the reformulation, increased to 10.76 in Q3 2010 when reformulated OxyContin was introduced, and decreased from 9.14 in Q4 2010 to 3.46 in Q3 2013 in the period following the reformulation. The sentiment profile for OxyContin changed following reformulation; the post-to-preintroduction change in the ERo indicated reformulated OxyContin was discouraged significantly more than the original formulation (ratio of ERos=0.43, P<.001). A total of 37 recipes for circumventing the abuse-deterrent characteristics of reformulated OxyContin were observed; 32 were deemed feasible (ie, able to abuse). The frequency of posts reporting abuse of reformulated OxyContin via these recipes was low and decreased over time. Among the 5677 posts mentioning reformulated OxyContin, 825 posts discussed recipes and 498 reported abuse of reformulated OxyContin by such recipes (41 reported injecting and 128 reported snorting).

CONCLUSIONS

After introduction of physicochemical properties to deter abuse, changes in discussion of OxyContin on forums occurred reflected by a reduction in discussion levels and endorsing content. Despite discussion of recipes, there is a relatively small proportion of reported abuse of reformulated OxyContin via recipes, particularly by injecting or snorting routes. Analysis of Internet discussion is a valuable tool for monitoring the impact of abuse-deterrent formulations.

摘要

背景

重新配制阿片类镇痛药以防止滥用是改善其效益风险平衡的一种方法。为了评估在难以接触到的处方药滥用人群中对这些产品的看法以及破解这些产品的企图,评估互联网论坛上有关重新配制产品的帖子可能会有所帮助。一种具有防止滥用的物理化学性质的奥施康定(缓释羟考酮)重新配制版本为评估在线讨论中有关重新配制的帖子提供了契机。

目的

本研究的目的是利用互联网论坛上的信息来评估对重新配制的奥施康定推出的反应,并确定旨在破解该产品滥用威慑特性的方法。

方法

收集了2008年1月1日至2013年9月30日期间7个论坛的帖子,并在2010年8月9日重新配制的奥施康定推出前后进行了评估。对整个研究期间的讨论水平进行了定量评估,并对奥施康定重新配制前后26个月期间奥施康定及2种对照药物的帖子内容进行了定性编码。重新配制前后,根据支持帖子与反对帖子的比例(ERo)估算每种产品的产品认可度。还计算了每种产品重新配制后与引入前时期ERo的变化(即ERo的比值)。此外,对2010年8月9日至2013年9月期间与破解重新配制的奥施康定配方相关的帖子内容进行了评估。

结果

在研究期间,共识别出45936条与奥施康定相关的帖子、18685条与维柯丁(氢可酮)相关的帖子以及23863条与度冷丁(氢吗啡酮)相关的帖子。重新配制前,每1000条帖子中与奥施康定相关的帖子比例在6.35至8.25条之间波动,在2010年第三季度引入重新配制的奥施康定后增至10.76条,在重新配制后的时期从2010年第四季度的9.14条降至2013年第三季度的3.46条。重新配制后奥施康定的看法概况发生了变化;ERo的重新配制后与引入前的变化表明,重新配制的奥施康定比原配方受到的反对明显更多(ERo比值=0.43,P<0.001)。共观察到37种破解重新配制的奥施康定滥用威慑特性的配方;其中32种被认为可行(即能够被滥用)。通过这些配方报告滥用重新配制的奥施康定的帖子频率较低且随时间下降。在提到重新配制的奥施康定的5677条帖子中,825条讨论了配方,498条报告通过此类配方滥用重新配制的奥施康定(41条报告注射,128条报告吸食)。

结论

在引入防止滥用的物理化学性质后,论坛上奥施康定的讨论发生了变化,表现为讨论水平和支持内容的减少。尽管有关于配方的讨论,但通过配方报告滥用重新配制的奥施康定的比例相对较小,尤其是通过注射或吸食途径。互联网讨论分析是监测滥用威慑制剂影响的宝贵工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afb4/4026575/094636834186/jmir_v16i5e119_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验