Majumdar S R, McAlister F A, Johnson J A, Weir D L, Bellerose D, Hanley D A, Russell A S, Rowe B H
The Department of Medicine, University of Alberta in Edmonton, 5-134B Clinical Sciences Building, 11350-83rd Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G3, Canada,
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Sep;25(9):2173-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2728-z. Epub 2014 May 7.
Most patients are not treated for osteoporosis after their fragility fracture "teachable moment." Among almost 400 consecutive wrist fracture patients, we determined that better-than-average osteoporosis knowledge (adjusted odds = 2.6) and BMD testing (adjusted odds = 6.5) were significant modifiable facilitators of bisphosphonate treatment while male sex, working outside the home, and depression were major barriers.
In the year following fragility fracture, fewer than one quarter of patients are treated for osteoporosis. Although much is known regarding health system and provider barriers and facilitators to osteoporosis treatment, much less is understood about modifiable patient-related factors.
Older patients with wrist fracture not treated for osteoporosis were enrolled in trials that compared a multifaceted intervention with usual care controls. Baseline data included a test of patient osteoporosis knowledge. We then determined baseline factors that independently predicted starting bisphosphonate treatment within 1 year.
Three hundred seventy-four patients were enrolled; mean age 64 years, 78 % women, 90 % white, and 54 % with prior fracture. Within 1 year, 86 of 374 (23 %) patients were treated with bisphosphonates. Patients who were treated had better osteoporosis knowledge at baseline (70 % correct vs 57 % for untreated, p < 0.001) than patients who remained untreated; conversely, untreated patients were more likely to be male, still working, and report depression. In fully adjusted models, osteoporosis knowledge was independently associated with starting bisphosphonates (adjusted OR 2.6, 95 %CI 1.3-5.3). Obtaining a BMD test (aOR 6.5, 95 %CI 3.4-12.2) and abnormal BMD results (aOR 34.5, 95 %CI 16.8-70.9) were strongly associated with starting treatment.
The most important modifiable facilitators of osteoporosis treatment in patients with fracture were knowledge and BMD testing. Specifically targeting these two patient-level factors should improve post-fracture treatment rates.
大多数患者在发生脆性骨折这个“可教育时机”后未接受骨质疏松症治疗。在近400例连续的腕部骨折患者中,我们确定,优于平均水平的骨质疏松症知识(调整比值=2.6)和骨密度检测(调整比值=6.5)是双膦酸盐治疗的显著可改变促进因素,而男性、外出工作和抑郁是主要障碍。
在脆性骨折后的一年中,不到四分之一的患者接受骨质疏松症治疗。虽然对于卫生系统和医疗服务提供者在骨质疏松症治疗方面的障碍和促进因素已有很多了解,但对于与患者相关的可改变因素了解较少。
未接受骨质疏松症治疗的老年腕部骨折患者参加了将多方面干预措施与常规护理对照进行比较的试验。基线数据包括对患者骨质疏松症知识的测试。然后,我们确定了独立预测在1年内开始双膦酸盐治疗的基线因素。
共纳入374例患者;平均年龄64岁,78%为女性,90%为白人,54%有既往骨折史。在1年内,374例患者中有86例(23%)接受了双膦酸盐治疗。接受治疗的患者在基线时的骨质疏松症知识水平(正确回答率70%,未治疗患者为57%,p<0.001)高于未接受治疗的患者;相反,未治疗的患者更可能为男性、仍在工作且报告有抑郁症状。在完全调整模型中,骨质疏松症知识与开始使用双膦酸盐治疗独立相关(调整后比值比2.6,95%置信区间1.3-5.3)。进行骨密度检测(调整后比值比6.5,95%置信区间3.4-12.2)和骨密度检测结果异常(调整后比值比34.5,95%置信区间16.8-70.9)与开始治疗密切相关。
骨折患者骨质疏松症治疗最重要的可改变促进因素是知识和骨密度检测。专门针对这两个患者层面的因素应可提高骨折后的治疗率。