• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气腹和头低脚高位对腹腔镜妇科手术中I-gel™喉罩和ProSeal LMA™喉罩口咽密封压力的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Mishra Sandeep Kumar, Sivaraman B, Balachander Hemavathy, Naggappa Mahesh, Parida Satyen, Bhat Ravindra R, Yuvaraj Kotteeswaran

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.

出版信息

Anesth Essays Res. 2015 Sep-Dec;9(3):353-8. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.159771.

DOI:10.4103/0259-1162.159771
PMID:26712973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4683478/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A sustained and effective oropharyngeal sealing with supraglottic airway (SGA) is required to maintain the ventilation during laparoscopic gynecological surgery in the Trendelenburg position. This study was conducted with I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™, two prototype SGA devices with a gastric access.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients and randomized to either I-gel or ProSeal LMA (PLMA) group. After induction of anesthesia using a standardized protocol, one of the SGA devices was inserted. The primary objective of this study was to compare the oropharyngeal leak (sealing) pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ after pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position. The secondary objectives were to compare ease of insertion, cuff position as assessed by the fiberoptic view of the glottis, adequacy of ventilation and incidence of complication.

RESULTS

The baseline (before pneumoperitoneum) oropharyngeal leak pressure of I-gel was less than the PLMA (mean (standard deviation [SD]) 24 (4) vs. 29 (4) cmH2O, respectively; P < 0.001). After pneumoperitoneum, the leak airway pressure in I-gel group was significantly less than that of PLMA group (mean [SD] 27 (3) vs. 34.0 (4) cmH2O, respectively; P < 0.001). Peak airway pressure was increased after pneumoperitoneum compared to baseline in both the groups. However, end-tidal carbon dioxide was maintained within normal limits. The insertion parameters, fiberoptic view of the glottis, fiberoptic view of the drain tube, and complications were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Both I-gel and PLMA are effective for ventilation in gynecological laparoscopic surgeries. However, PLMA provides better sealing as compared to I-gel.

摘要

背景

在腹腔镜妇科手术中采用头低脚高位时,需要通过声门上气道(SGA)实现持续有效的口咽密封,以维持通气。本研究使用了I-gel™和ProSeal LMA™这两种具有胃通路的SGA原型设备。

材料与方法

我们纳入了60例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况为I级和II级的患者,并随机分为I-gel组或ProSeal LMA(PLMA)组。采用标准化方案诱导麻醉后,插入其中一种SGA设备。本研究的主要目的是比较气腹和头低脚高位后I-gel™和ProSeal LMA™的口咽漏(密封)压。次要目的是比较插入的难易程度、通过声门的纤维镜观察评估的套囊位置、通气的充分性以及并发症的发生率。

结果

I-gel的基线(气腹前)口咽漏压低于PLMA(分别为平均(标准差[SD])24(4)cmH2O和29(4)cmH2O;P<0.001)。气腹后,I-gel组的漏气气道压显著低于PLMA组(分别为平均[SD]27(3)cmH2O和34.0(4)cmH2O;P<0.001)。与基线相比,两组气腹后的气道峰压均升高。然而,呼气末二氧化碳维持在正常范围内。两组之间的插入参数、声门的纤维镜观察、引流管的纤维镜观察以及并发症相当。

结论

I-gel和PLMA在妇科腹腔镜手术通气方面均有效。然而,与I-gel相比,PLMA提供了更好的密封效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cfe/4683478/362baa16fd6b/AER-9-353-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cfe/4683478/d6e98068b9a9/AER-9-353-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cfe/4683478/3599c389b03b/AER-9-353-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cfe/4683478/0c66a902400f/AER-9-353-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cfe/4683478/362baa16fd6b/AER-9-353-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cfe/4683478/d6e98068b9a9/AER-9-353-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cfe/4683478/3599c389b03b/AER-9-353-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cfe/4683478/0c66a902400f/AER-9-353-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cfe/4683478/362baa16fd6b/AER-9-353-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial.气腹和头低脚高位对腹腔镜妇科手术中I-gel™喉罩和ProSeal LMA™喉罩口咽密封压力的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Anesth Essays Res. 2015 Sep-Dec;9(3):353-8. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.159771.
2
Effect of Pneumoperitoneum and Lateral Position on Oropharyngeal Seal Pressures of Proseal LMA in Laparoscopic Urological Procedures.气腹和侧卧位对腹腔镜泌尿外科手术中喉罩气道密封压的影响
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb;11(2):UC05-UC09. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22168.9422. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
3
Comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between three second generation supraglottic airway devices during laparoscopic surgery in pediatric patients.三种第二代声门上气道装置在小儿腹腔镜手术中口咽漏压的比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2022 Jul;32(7):843-850. doi: 10.1111/pan.14447. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
4
Comparison of Size 2.5 i-gel™ with Proseal LMA™ in Anaesthetised, Paralyzed Children Undergoing Elective Surgery.在接受择期手术的麻醉、瘫痪儿童中比较2.5号i-gel™喉罩与Proseal LMA™喉罩的效果
N Am J Med Sci. 2012 Oct;4(10):453-7. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.101983.
5
Comparison of i-gel supraglottic airway and LMA-ProSeal™ in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation.在控制通气下小儿患者中使用i-gel喉上气道与LMA-ProSeal™的比较。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;30(2):195-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.130013.
6
AutoFlow® versus volume-controlled ventilation for laparoscopic gynecological surgery using LMA® ProSeal™: a randomized controlled trial.AutoFlow® 与容量控制通气在 LMA® ProSeal™ 下用于腹腔镜妇科手术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jun 28;21(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01406-6.
7
Influence of Head and Neck Position on Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Cuff Position with the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway and the I-Gel: A Randomized Clinical Trial.头颈部位置对使用ProSeal喉罩气道和I-Gel时口咽漏气压及套囊位置的影响:一项随机临床试验
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2015;2015:705869. doi: 10.1155/2015/705869. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
8
A randomised controlled trial comparing ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, i-gel and Laryngeal Tube Suction-D under general anaesthesia for elective surgical patients requiring controlled ventilation.一项针对需要控制通气的择期手术患者,在全身麻醉下比较ProSeal喉罩气道、i-gel和Laryngeal Tube Suction-D的随机对照试验。
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Dec;61(12):972-977. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_339_17.
9
Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者中 Supreme 喉罩与 ProSeal 喉罩气道的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2016 Jun;54(2):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
10
Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the I-Gel™ in the different head-and-neck positions in anaesthetised paralysed children: A randomised controlled trial.在麻醉状态下瘫痪儿童的不同头颈部位置,比较ProSeal喉罩气道与I-Gel™:一项随机对照试验。
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;62(2):103-108. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_594_17.

引用本文的文献

1
Choice of supraglottic airway devices: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.声门上气道装置的选择:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Dec;133(6):1284-1306. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.09.001. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Contrast of oropharyngeal leak pressure and clinical performance of I-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in patients: A meta-analysis.比较 I-gel™ 和 LMA ProSeal™ 在患者中的咽腔漏气压和临床性能:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 15;17(12):e0278871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278871. eCollection 2022.
3
LMA® protector™ in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries: a multicenter prospective observational study.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of Head and Neck Position on Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Cuff Position with the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway and the I-Gel: A Randomized Clinical Trial.头颈部位置对使用ProSeal喉罩气道和I-Gel时口咽漏气压及套囊位置的影响:一项随机临床试验
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2015;2015:705869. doi: 10.1155/2015/705869. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
2
Comparison of the Proseal LMA and intersurgical I-gel during gynecological laparoscopy.喉罩与 I-gel 通气道在妇科腹腔镜手术中的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Dec;63(6):510-4. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.6.510. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
3
The comparison of Proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia.
腹腔镜手术中使用 LMA® protector™:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec 20;21(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01535-y.
4
Comparison of gastric insufflation using LMA-supreme and I-gel versus tracheal intubation in laparoscopic gynecological surgery by ultrasound: a randomized observational trial.超声引导下腹腔镜妇科手术中使用 LMA-supreme 和 I-gel 进行胃充气与气管插管的比较:一项随机观察性试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jun 3;20(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01057-z.
5
Effect of Pneumoperitoneum and Lateral Position on Oropharyngeal Seal Pressures of Proseal LMA in Laparoscopic Urological Procedures.气腹和侧卧位对腹腔镜泌尿外科手术中喉罩气道密封压的影响
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb;11(2):UC05-UC09. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22168.9422. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
全身麻醉下接受腹腔镜手术患者中喉罩气道与气管导管的比较
Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Mar;55(2):129-34. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.79891.
4
PLMA vs. I-gel: A Comparative Evaluation of Respiratory Mechanics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.喉罩气道与喉罩型喉管:腹腔镜胆囊切除术中呼吸力学的比较评估
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Oct;26(4):451-7.
5
Comparison of the LMA Supreme vs the i-gel in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation.比较 LMA Supreme 喉罩与 i-gel 喉罩在接受控制性通气的妇科腹腔镜手术中对瘫痪患者的影响。
Anaesthesia. 2010 Dec;65(12):1173-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06534.x. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
6
Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.一次性使用的LMA supreme与可重复使用的ProSeal LMA在妇科腹腔镜手术麻醉中的比较。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009 Sep;37(5):815-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0903700537.
7
A randomised crossover trial comparing the i-gel supraglottic airway and classic laryngeal mask airway.一项比较i-gel声门上气道与传统喉罩气道的随机交叉试验。
Anaesthesia. 2009 Jun;64(6):674-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05898.x.
8
Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients.对100例未使用肌肉松弛剂的患者使用4号i-gel气道的评估。
Anaesthesia. 2008 Oct;63(10):1124-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05561.x. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
9
A new single use supraglottic airway device with a noninflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study of the i-gel.一种带有不可充气袖带和食管排气孔的新型一次性声门上气道装置:i-gel的观察性研究。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Apr;106(4):1137-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318164f062.
10
A study of airway management using the ProSeal LMA laryngeal mask airway compared with the tracheal tube on postoperative analgesia requirements following gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.一项关于在妇科腹腔镜手术后使用ProSeal喉罩气道与气管导管进行气道管理对术后镇痛需求影响的研究。
Anaesthesia. 2007 Sep;62(9):913-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05142.x.