Mishra Sandeep Kumar, Sivaraman B, Balachander Hemavathy, Naggappa Mahesh, Parida Satyen, Bhat Ravindra R, Yuvaraj Kotteeswaran
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2015 Sep-Dec;9(3):353-8. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.159771.
A sustained and effective oropharyngeal sealing with supraglottic airway (SGA) is required to maintain the ventilation during laparoscopic gynecological surgery in the Trendelenburg position. This study was conducted with I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™, two prototype SGA devices with a gastric access.
We enrolled 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients and randomized to either I-gel or ProSeal LMA (PLMA) group. After induction of anesthesia using a standardized protocol, one of the SGA devices was inserted. The primary objective of this study was to compare the oropharyngeal leak (sealing) pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ after pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position. The secondary objectives were to compare ease of insertion, cuff position as assessed by the fiberoptic view of the glottis, adequacy of ventilation and incidence of complication.
The baseline (before pneumoperitoneum) oropharyngeal leak pressure of I-gel was less than the PLMA (mean (standard deviation [SD]) 24 (4) vs. 29 (4) cmH2O, respectively; P < 0.001). After pneumoperitoneum, the leak airway pressure in I-gel group was significantly less than that of PLMA group (mean [SD] 27 (3) vs. 34.0 (4) cmH2O, respectively; P < 0.001). Peak airway pressure was increased after pneumoperitoneum compared to baseline in both the groups. However, end-tidal carbon dioxide was maintained within normal limits. The insertion parameters, fiberoptic view of the glottis, fiberoptic view of the drain tube, and complications were comparable between the groups.
Both I-gel and PLMA are effective for ventilation in gynecological laparoscopic surgeries. However, PLMA provides better sealing as compared to I-gel.
在腹腔镜妇科手术中采用头低脚高位时,需要通过声门上气道(SGA)实现持续有效的口咽密封,以维持通气。本研究使用了I-gel™和ProSeal LMA™这两种具有胃通路的SGA原型设备。
我们纳入了60例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况为I级和II级的患者,并随机分为I-gel组或ProSeal LMA(PLMA)组。采用标准化方案诱导麻醉后,插入其中一种SGA设备。本研究的主要目的是比较气腹和头低脚高位后I-gel™和ProSeal LMA™的口咽漏(密封)压。次要目的是比较插入的难易程度、通过声门的纤维镜观察评估的套囊位置、通气的充分性以及并发症的发生率。
I-gel的基线(气腹前)口咽漏压低于PLMA(分别为平均(标准差[SD])24(4)cmH2O和29(4)cmH2O;P<0.001)。气腹后,I-gel组的漏气气道压显著低于PLMA组(分别为平均[SD]27(3)cmH2O和34.0(4)cmH2O;P<0.001)。与基线相比,两组气腹后的气道峰压均升高。然而,呼气末二氧化碳维持在正常范围内。两组之间的插入参数、声门的纤维镜观察、引流管的纤维镜观察以及并发症相当。
I-gel和PLMA在妇科腹腔镜手术通气方面均有效。然而,与I-gel相比,PLMA提供了更好的密封效果。