Kim Jae Kyoung, Kilpatrick Zachary P, Bennett Matthew R, Josić Krešimir
Mathematical Biosciences Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Department of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas.
Biophys J. 2014 May 6;106(9):2071-81. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.02.039.
In mammals, most cells in the brain and peripheral tissues generate circadian (∼24 h) rhythms autonomously. These self-sustained rhythms are coordinated and entrained by a master circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Within the SCN, the individual rhythms of each neuron are synchronized through intercellular signaling. One important feature of SCN is that the synchronized period is close to the population mean of cells' intrinsic periods. In this way, the synchronized period of the SCN stays close to the periods of cells in peripheral tissues. This is important because the SCN must entrain cells throughout the body. However, the mechanism that drives the period of the coupled SCN cells to the population mean is not known. We use mathematical modeling and analysis to show that the mechanism of transcription repression in the intracellular feedback loop plays a pivotal role in regulating the coupled period. Specifically, we use phase response curve analysis to show that the coupled period within the SCN stays near the population mean if transcriptional repression occurs via protein sequestration. In contrast, the coupled period is far from the mean if repression occurs through highly nonlinear Hill-type regulation (e.g., oligomer- or phosphorylation-based repression), as widely assumed in previous mathematical models. Furthermore, we find that the timescale of intercellular coupling needs to be fast compared to that of intracellular feedback to maintain the mean period. These findings reveal the important relationship between the intracellular transcriptional feedback loop and intercellular coupling. This relationship explains why transcriptional repression appears to occur via protein sequestration in multicellular organisms, mammals, and Drosophila, in contrast with the phosphorylation-based repression in unicellular organisms and syncytia. That is, transition to protein sequestration is essential for synchronizing multiple cells with a period close to the population mean (∼24 h).
在哺乳动物中,大脑和外周组织中的大多数细胞自主产生昼夜节律(约24小时)。这些自我维持的节律由视交叉上核(SCN)中的主生物钟进行协调和校准。在SCN内,每个神经元的个体节律通过细胞间信号传导实现同步。SCN的一个重要特征是,同步周期接近细胞固有周期的群体平均值。通过这种方式,SCN的同步周期与外周组织中的细胞周期保持接近。这很重要,因为SCN必须校准全身的细胞。然而,驱动耦合的SCN细胞周期达到群体平均值的机制尚不清楚。我们使用数学建模和分析表明,细胞内反馈回路中的转录抑制机制在调节耦合周期中起着关键作用。具体而言,我们使用相位响应曲线分析表明,如果转录抑制通过蛋白质隔离发生,SCN内的耦合周期会保持在群体平均值附近。相比之下,如果抑制通过高度非线性的希尔型调节(例如基于寡聚体或磷酸化的抑制)发生,耦合周期则远离平均值,这是先前数学模型中广泛假设的情况。此外,我们发现与细胞内反馈相比,细胞间耦合的时间尺度需要很快,以维持平均周期。这些发现揭示了细胞内转录反馈回路与细胞间耦合之间的重要关系。这种关系解释了为什么在多细胞生物、哺乳动物和果蝇中,转录抑制似乎通过蛋白质隔离发生,这与单细胞生物和合体中的基于磷酸化的抑制形成对比。也就是说,向蛋白质隔离的转变对于使多个细胞以接近群体平均值(约24小时)的周期同步至关重要。