Mehendale H M
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216.
Toxicol Lett. 1989 Dec;49(2-3):215-41. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(89)90034-9.
There is significant interest in the possibility of unusual toxicity due to interaction of toxic chemicals upon environmental or occupational exposures even though such exposures may involve levels ordinarily considered harmless individually. While many laboratory and experimental models exist for such interactions, progress in this area of toxicology has suffered for want of a model where the interactants are individually non-toxic. We developed such a model where prior exposure to non-toxic levels of the pesticide Kepone (chlordecone) results in a 67-fold amplification of CCl4 lethality in experimental animals. The mechanism(s) by which chlordecone amplifies the hepatotoxicity of halomethanes such as CCl4, CHCl3, and BrCCl3 has been a subject of intense study. The biological effects of this interaction include extensive hepatotoxicity characterized by histopathological alterations, hepatic dysfunction, and perturbation of related biochemical parameters. Close structural analogs of chlordecone such as mirex and photomirex do not share the propensity of chlordecone to potentiate halomethane toxicity. Mechanisms such as induction of microsomal cytochrome P-450 by chlordecone and greater lipid peroxidation are inadequate to explain the remarkably powerful potentiation of toxicity and lethality. Time-course studies in which liver tissue was examined 1-36 h after CCl4 administration were conducted. While animals receiving a normally nontoxic dose of CCl4 alone show limited hepatocellular necrosis by 6 h, proceeding to greater injury after 12 h, recovery phase ensues as revealed by greatly increased number of mitotic figures. Such regeneration and hepatic tissue repair processes are totally suppressed in animals exposed to chlordecone prior to CCl4. Thus, the arrested hepatocellular repair and renovation play a key role in the potentiation of CCl4 liver injury by chlordecone. These findings have allowed us to propose a novel hypothesis for the mechanism of chlordecone amplification of halomethane toxicity and lethality. While limited injury is initiated by the low dose of CCl4 by bioactivation followed by lipid peroxidation, this normally recoverable injury permissively progresses due to arrested hepatocellular regeneration and tissue repair processes. Recent studies designed to test this hypothesis have provided additional supporting evidence. Hepatocellular regeneration stimulated by partial hepatectomy was unaffected by 10 ppm dietary chlordecone, while these animals were protected from the hepatotoxic and lethal actions of CCl4 if administered at the time of maximal hepatocellular regeneration. The protection was abolished when CCl4 was administered upon cessation of hepatocellular regeneration.
尽管环境或职业暴露中有毒化学物质的相互作用可能涉及通常被认为单独无害的水平,但人们对其可能导致异常毒性仍有着浓厚兴趣。虽然存在许多用于此类相互作用的实验室和实验模型,但由于缺乏一种相互作用物质单独无毒的模型,毒理学这一领域的进展受到了阻碍。我们开发了这样一种模型,即预先暴露于无毒水平的农药开蓬(十氯酮)会导致实验动物中四氯化碳致死率放大67倍。十氯酮放大卤代甲烷(如四氯化碳、氯仿和三氯溴甲烷)肝毒性的机制一直是深入研究的课题。这种相互作用的生物学效应包括以组织病理学改变、肝功能障碍和相关生化参数紊乱为特征的广泛肝毒性。十氯酮的紧密结构类似物,如灭蚁灵和光灭蚁灵,并不具有十氯酮增强卤代甲烷毒性的倾向。诸如十氯酮诱导微粒体细胞色素P - 450以及更大程度的脂质过氧化等机制,不足以解释毒性和致死率的显著增强。我们进行了在给予四氯化碳后1 - 36小时检查肝组织的时间进程研究。单独接受正常无毒剂量四氯化碳的动物,在6小时时显示出有限的肝细胞坏死,12小时后损伤加剧,随后出现恢复期,有丝分裂细胞数量大幅增加表明了这一点。在四氯化碳之前暴露于十氯酮的动物中,这种再生和肝组织修复过程完全受到抑制。因此,肝细胞修复和更新的停滞在十氯酮增强四氯化碳肝损伤中起关键作用。这些发现使我们能够提出一个关于十氯酮放大卤代甲烷毒性和致死率机制的新假设。虽然低剂量的四氯化碳通过生物活化引发有限的损伤,随后发生脂质过氧化,但由于肝细胞再生和组织修复过程的停滞,这种通常可恢复的损伤会持续发展。最近旨在检验这一假设的研究提供了更多支持证据。部分肝切除刺激的肝细胞再生不受10 ppm饮食中十氯酮的影响,而如果在肝细胞最大再生时给予四氯化碳,这些动物则受到保护,免受其肝毒性和致死作用。当肝细胞再生停止后给予四氯化碳时,这种保护作用就消失了。