Mehendale H M
Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Northeast Louisiana University, Monroe 71209-0470.
Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Nov;102 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):139-49. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102s9139.
It is widely recognized that exposure to combinations or mixtures of chemicals may result in highly exaggerated toxicity even though the individual chemicals might not be toxic. Assessment of risk from exposure to combinations of chemicals requires the knowledge of the underlying mechanism(s). Dietary exposure to a nontoxic dose of chlordecone (CD; 10 ppm, 15 days) results in a 67-fold increase in lethality of an ordinarily inconsequential dose of CCl4 (100 microliters/kg, ip). Toxicity of closely related CHCl3 and BrCCl3 is also enhanced. Phenobarbital (PB, 225 ppm, 15 days) and mirex (10 ppm, 15 days) do not share the propensity of CD in this regard. Exposure to PB + CCl4 results in enhanced liver injury similar to that observed with CD, but the animals recover and survive in contrast to the greatly amplified lethality of CD + CCl4. Investigations have revealed that neither enhanced bioactivation of CCl4 nor increased lipid peroxidation offers a satisfactory explanation of these findings. Additional studies indicate that exposure to a low dose of CCl4 (100 microliters/kg, ip) results in limited injury, which is accompanied by a biphasic response of hepatocellular regeneration (6 and 36 hr) and tissue repair, which enables the animals to recover from injury. Exposure to CD + CCl4 results in suppressed tissue repair owing to an energy deficit in hepatocytes as a consequence of excessive intracellular influx of Ca2+ leading initially to a precipitous decline in glycogen and ultimately to hypoglycemia. Supplementation of cellular energy results in restoration of the tissue repair and complete recovery from the toxicity of CD + CCl4 combination. In contrast, only the early-phase hepatic tissue repair (6 hr) is affected in PB + CCl4 treatment, but this is adequately compensated for by a greater stimulation of tissue repair at 24 and 48 hr resulting in recovery from liver injury and animal survival. A wide variety of additional experimental evidence confirms the central role of stimulated tissue repair as a decisive determinant of the final outcome of liver injury inflicted by CCl4. For instance, a 35-fold greater CCl4 sensitivity of gerbils compared to rats is correlated with the very sluggish tissue repair in gerbils. These findings are consistent with a two-stage model of toxicity, where tissue injury is inflicted by the well described "mechanisms of toxicity," but the outcome of this injury is determined by whether or not sustainable tissue repair response accompanies this injury.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
人们普遍认识到,接触化学物质的组合或混合物可能会导致毒性大幅增强,即使单个化学物质本身可能无毒。评估接触化学物质组合的风险需要了解其潜在机制。经口给予无毒剂量的十氯酮(CD;10 ppm,持续15天)会导致通常无害剂量的四氯化碳(CCl4;100微升/千克,腹腔注射)的致死率增加67倍。与之密切相关的三氯甲烷(CHCl3)和三氯溴甲烷(BrCCl3)的毒性也会增强。在这方面,苯巴比妥(PB,225 ppm,持续15天)和灭蚁灵(10 ppm,持续15天)并不具有CD的这种特性。接触PB + CCl4会导致肝脏损伤加剧,与CD的情况类似,但动物能够恢复并存活下来,这与CD + CCl4导致的致死率大幅增加形成对比。研究表明,CCl4生物活化增强或脂质过氧化增加都无法令人满意地解释这些发现。进一步的研究表明,接触低剂量的CCl4(100微升/千克,腹腔注射)会导致有限的损伤,同时伴有肝细胞再生(6小时和36小时)和组织修复的双相反应,这使动物能够从损伤中恢复。接触CD + CCl4会导致组织修复受到抑制,这是由于肝细胞内Ca2+过度内流导致能量不足,最初导致糖原急剧下降,最终导致低血糖。补充细胞能量可使组织修复恢复,并从CD + CCl4组合的毒性中完全恢复。相比之下,PB + CCl4处理仅影响早期肝脏组织修复(6小时),但在24小时和48小时时组织修复受到更大刺激,从而弥补了这一影响,导致肝脏损伤恢复且动物存活。大量其他实验证据证实,受刺激的组织修复作为CCl4所致肝损伤最终结果的决定性因素发挥着核心作用。例如,沙鼠对CCl4的敏感性比大鼠高35倍,这与沙鼠组织修复非常缓慢有关。这些发现与毒性的两阶段模型一致,即组织损伤是由众所周知的“毒性机制”造成的,但这种损伤的结果取决于损伤是否伴随着可持续的组织修复反应。(摘要截取自400字)