• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缩短急诊科候诊时间,改善患者就医流程与就医体验。

Minimizing ED Waiting Times and Improving Patient Flow and Experience of Care.

作者信息

Sayah Assaad, Rogers Loni, Devarajan Karthik, Kingsley-Rocker Lisa, Lobon Luis F

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, 1493 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA ; Heller School of Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.

出版信息

Emerg Med Int. 2014;2014:981472. doi: 10.1155/2014/981472. Epub 2014 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1155/2014/981472
PMID:24829802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4009311/
Abstract

We conducted a pre- and postintervention analysis to assess the impact of a process improvement project at the Cambridge Hospital ED. Through a comprehensive and collaborative process, we reengineered the emergency patient experience from arrival to departure. The ED operational changes have had a significant positive impact on all measured metrics. Ambulance diversion decreased from a mean of 148 hours per quarter before changes in July 2006 to 0 hours since April 2007. ED total length of stay decreased from a mean of 204 minutes before the changes to 132 minutes. Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores rose from the 12th percentile to the 59th percentile. ED patient volume grew by 11%, from a mean of 7,221 patients per quarter to 8,044 patients per quarter. Compliance with ED specific quality core measures improved from a mean of 71% to 97%. The mean rate of ED patients that left without being seen (LWBS) dropped from 4.1% to 0.9%. Improving ED operational efficiency allowed us to accommodate increasing volume while improving the quality of care and satisfaction of the ED patients with minimal additional resources, space, or staffing.

摘要

我们进行了干预前后分析,以评估剑桥医院急诊科流程改进项目的影响。通过全面协作的过程,我们对急诊患者从入院到出院的体验进行了重新设计。急诊科的运营变化对所有测量指标都产生了显著的积极影响。救护车分流从2006年7月变化前每季度平均148小时降至2007年4月以来的0小时。急诊科总住院时间从变化前的平均204分钟降至132分钟。Press Ganey患者满意度评分从第12百分位升至第59百分位。急诊科患者数量增长了11%,从每季度平均7221例增至每季度8044例。急诊科特定质量核心指标的合规率从平均71%提高到97%。急诊科未就诊即离开(LWBS)的患者平均比例从4.1%降至0.9%。提高急诊科运营效率使我们能够在增加工作量的同时,以最少的额外资源、空间或人员配置提高护理质量和急诊科患者的满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/a94b32ff5e1e/EMI2014-981472.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/a78ae915beb7/EMI2014-981472.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/bfc83b3dd109/EMI2014-981472.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/1405a9eff87f/EMI2014-981472.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/32b7a1447984/EMI2014-981472.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/7435c11e7947/EMI2014-981472.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/55f5fd23026c/EMI2014-981472.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/f1080a9a7988/EMI2014-981472.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/a94b32ff5e1e/EMI2014-981472.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/a78ae915beb7/EMI2014-981472.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/bfc83b3dd109/EMI2014-981472.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/1405a9eff87f/EMI2014-981472.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/32b7a1447984/EMI2014-981472.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/7435c11e7947/EMI2014-981472.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/55f5fd23026c/EMI2014-981472.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/f1080a9a7988/EMI2014-981472.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/4009311/a94b32ff5e1e/EMI2014-981472.008.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimizing ED Waiting Times and Improving Patient Flow and Experience of Care.缩短急诊科候诊时间,改善患者就医流程与就医体验。
Emerg Med Int. 2014;2014:981472. doi: 10.1155/2014/981472. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
2
Emergency Department Expansion Versus Patient Flow Improvement: Impact on Patient Experience of Care.急诊科扩建与患者流程改善:对患者就医体验的影响。
J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;50(2):339-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.068. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
3
What Are We Measuring? Evaluating Physician-Specific Satisfaction Scores Between Emergency Departments.我们在衡量什么?评估急诊科医生之间的特定满意度评分。
West J Emerg Med. 2019 May;20(3):454-459. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.4.41040. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
4
A 5-year time study analysis of emergency department patient care efficiency.急诊科患者护理效率的5年时间研究分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;34(3):326-35. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70126-5.
5
Reduction of admit wait times: the effect of a leadership-based program.减少住院等候时间:基于领导力的项目的效果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Mar;21(3):266-73. doi: 10.1111/acem.12327.
6
The effect of an emergency department dedicated midtrack area on patient flow.急诊专用中间区域对患者流程的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;21(4):434-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12345.
7
The effects of a physician-nurse patient care team on patient satisfaction in an academic ED.医生-护士患者护理团队对学术性急诊科患者满意度的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2002 Jul;20(4):267-70. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2002.34199.
8
Emergency department contributors to ambulance diversion: a quantitative analysis.急诊科导致救护车分流的因素:一项定量分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;41(4):467-76. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.23.
9
Applying lean: implementation of a rapid triage and treatment system.应用精益:快速分诊和治疗系统的实施。
West J Emerg Med. 2011 May;12(2):184-91.
10
The effect of emergency department expansion on emergency department overcrowding.急诊科扩张对急诊科拥挤状况的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;14(4):338-43. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.12.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambulance diversion and its use as an ED overcrowding mitigation strategy: Does it work? A scoping review.救护车分流及其作为缓解急诊科拥挤的策略:它有效吗?一项范围综述。
Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 8;18(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00933-0.
2
Maximizing efficiency in emergency care: triple interventions to minimize left without being seen: An observational study.提高急诊效率:减少未就诊即离开的三重干预措施:一项观察性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 27;103(52):e40763. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040763.
3
Endometriosis leading to frequent emergency department visits-women's experiences and perspectives.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of a rapid assessment zone/pod on reducing overcrowding in emergency departments: a systematic review.快速评估区/舱在减少急诊科拥挤方面的作用:系统评价。
Emerg Med J. 2012 May;29(5):372-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.103598. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
2
The effect of emergency department crowding on patient outcomes: a literature review.急诊科拥挤对患者结局的影响:一项文献综述。
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2011 Jan-Mar;33(1):39-54. doi: 10.1097/TME.0b013e318207e86a.
3
Improved flow aids patient safety.改善血流有助于患者安全。
子宫内膜异位症导致频繁急诊就诊-女性的经历和观点。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 21;19(11):e0307680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307680. eCollection 2024.
4
Patient flow in emergency departments: a comprehensive umbrella review of solutions and challenges across the health system.急诊科患者流量:整个卫生系统解决方案和挑战的全面综合述评。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 5;24(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10725-6.
5
Evaluating Drivers of the Patient Experience Triangle: Stress, Anxiety, and Frustration.评估患者体验三角的驱动因素:压力、焦虑和挫败感。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 4;20(7):5384. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075384.
6
Current patterns of care at adult emergency department in Ethiopian tertiary university hospital.埃塞俄比亚三级大学医院成人急诊科当前的护理模式。
Int J Emerg Med. 2023 Apr 11;16(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12245-023-00502-3.
7
Emergency Department Overcrowding: Understanding the Factors to Find Corresponding Solutions.急诊科拥挤:了解相关因素以寻求相应解决方案。
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 14;12(2):279. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020279.
8
Do Automated Reminders for Emergency Department Resident Physicians to Review Their Patient List Improve Efficiency?急诊科住院医师自动提醒查看患者名单能否提高效率?
AEM Educ Train. 2020 Dec 12;5(3):e10552. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10552. eCollection 2021 Jul.
9
Why Do Patients Leave against Medical Advice? Reasons, Consequences, Prevention, and Interventions.患者为何自动出院?原因、后果、预防及干预措施。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jan 21;9(2):111. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020111.
10
Evaluation of the risk factors associated with emergency department boarding: A retrospective cross-sectional study.评估与急诊留观相关的风险因素:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Chin J Traumatol. 2020 Dec;23(6):346-350. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
ED Manag. 2011 Jan;23(1):10-1.
4
Emptying the corridors of shame: organizational lessons from England's 4-hour emergency throughput target.清空耻辱走廊:英国 4 小时急诊吞吐量目标带来的组织经验教训。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Feb;57(2):79-88.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.013.
5
Can Lean Thinking transform American health care?精益思维能改变美国的医疗保健吗?
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;57(3):279-81. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.11.027. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
6
Lean Thinking in emergency departments: a critical review.精益思维在急诊科的应用:批判性评价。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;57(3):265-78. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
7
Emergency department crowding is associated with decreased quality of care for children with acute asthma.急诊部拥挤与儿童急性哮喘的护理质量下降有关。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;57(3):191-200.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.027.
8
The four hour target to reduce Emergency Department 'waiting time': a systematic review of clinical outcomes.四小时目标降低急诊科“等待时间”:临床结局的系统评价。
Emerg Med Australas. 2010 Oct;22(5):391-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01330.x. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
9
Applying the Lean principles of the Toyota Production System to reduce wait times in the emergency department.将丰田生产系统的精益原则应用于急诊科,以减少等待时间。
CJEM. 2010 Jan;12(1):50-7. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012021.
10
US emergency department performance on wait time and length of visit.美国急诊部门在等待时间和就诊时长方面的表现。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;55(2):133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.07.023. Epub 2009 Oct 1.