Suppr超能文献

精益思维在急诊科的应用:批判性评价。

Lean Thinking in emergency departments: a critical review.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;57(3):265-78. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

Abstract

Emergency departments (EDs) face problems with crowding, delays, cost containment, and patient safety. To address these and other problems, EDs increasingly implement an approach called Lean thinking. This study critically reviewed 18 articles describing the implementation of Lean in 15 EDs in the United States, Australia, and Canada. An analytic framework based on human factors engineering and occupational research generated 6 core questions about the effects of Lean on ED work structures and processes, patient care, and employees, as well as the factors on which Lean's success is contingent. The review revealed numerous ED process changes, often involving separate patient streams, accompanied by structural changes such as new technologies, communication systems, staffing changes, and the reorganization of physical space. Patient care usually improved after implementation of Lean, with many EDs reporting decreases in length of stay, waiting times, and proportion of patients leaving the ED without being seen. Few null or negative patient care effects were reported, and studies typically did not report patient quality or safety outcomes beyond patient satisfaction. The effects of Lean on employees were rarely discussed or measured systematically, but there were some indications of positive effects on employees and organizational culture. Success factors included employee involvement, management support, and preparedness for change. Despite some methodological, practical, and theoretic concerns, Lean appears to offer significant improvement opportunities. Many questions remain about Lean's effects on patient health and employees and how Lean can be best implemented in health care.

摘要

急诊科面临着拥挤、延误、成本控制和患者安全等问题。为了解决这些问题和其他问题,急诊科越来越多地采用一种称为精益思维的方法。本研究批判性地回顾了 18 篇描述在美国、澳大利亚和加拿大的 15 家急诊科实施精益的文章。一个基于人为因素工程学和职业研究的分析框架提出了 6 个核心问题,涉及精益对急诊科工作结构和流程、患者护理和员工的影响,以及精益成功所依赖的因素。审查结果显示,急诊科的流程发生了许多变化,通常涉及单独的患者流,同时还伴随着结构变化,如新的技术、沟通系统、人员配备变化以及物理空间的重新组织。实施精益后,患者护理通常会得到改善,许多急诊科报告说,患者的停留时间、等待时间和未就诊离开急诊科的比例都有所减少。很少有报告称患者护理产生了负面或无效的效果,而且研究通常不报告患者质量或安全结果,超出了患者满意度。精益对员工的影响很少被讨论或系统地衡量,但有一些迹象表明对员工和组织文化有积极的影响。成功因素包括员工参与、管理层支持和对变革的准备。尽管存在一些方法学、实际和理论上的问题,但精益似乎提供了显著的改进机会。关于精益对患者健康和员工的影响,以及如何在医疗保健中最好地实施精益,仍有许多问题悬而未决。

相似文献

1
Lean Thinking in emergency departments: a critical review.精益思维在急诊科的应用:批判性评价。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;57(3):265-78. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
3
Use of lean in the emergency department: a case series of 4 hospitals.急诊科精益管理的应用:4家医院的病例系列研究
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;54(4):504-10. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.024. Epub 2009 May 6.
5
The effects of a lean transition on process times, patients and employees.精益转型对流程时间、患者和员工的影响。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Mar 13;30(2):103-118. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2015-0106.
10
Improving ED specimen TAT using Lean Six Sigma.运用精益六西格玛改善急诊标本周转时间
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(5):428-40. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-10-2013-0117.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Can lean save lives?瘦肉能救命吗?
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2007;20(4):231-41. doi: 10.1108/17511870710829346.
3
Lean as a learning system in a hospital ward.医院病房中作为学习系统的精益管理
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2007;20(1):33-41. doi: 10.1108/17511870710721471.
6
Kaizen: a method of process improvement in the emergency department.改善:急诊部的一种流程改进方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Dec;16(12):1341-1349. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00580.x.
10
Some challenges facing Lean Thinking in healthcare.医疗保健领域精益思维面临的一些挑战。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Oct;21(5):309-10. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzp038.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验