Suppr超能文献

使用单腿站立试验(睁眼)对老年人进行机车综合征筛查时,确定最佳截止时间。

Determination of the optimal cutoff time to use when screening elderly people for locomotive syndrome using the one-leg standing test (with eyes open).

作者信息

Seichi Atsushi, Hoshino Yuichi, Doi Tokuhide, Akai Masami, Tobimatsu Yoshiko, Kita Kiyoshi, Iwaya Tsutomu

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan,

出版信息

J Orthop Sci. 2014 Jul;19(4):620-6. doi: 10.1007/s00776-014-0581-8. Epub 2014 May 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish the cutoff time for the one-leg standing (OLS) test (with eyes open) to use when screening elderly people for locomotive syndrome.

METHODS

Patients visiting orthopedic clinics and healthy volunteers, all ≥65 years old, were recruited. Participants were asked to complete the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25) and then underwent the OLS test. Using the previously determined GLFS-25 cutoff value, participants were divided into two groups: the locomotive and the non-locomotive syndrome groups (GLFS-25 scores of ≥16 and <16, respectively). Conventional receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to calculate the optimal cutoff time for the OLS.

RESULTS

Data from 880 individuals (261 men, 619 women; mean age (SD), 77 (6) years; range 65-96 years) were analyzed; 497 were in the locomotive syndrome group and 383 were in the non-locomotive syndrome group. A significant difference was seen between each group mean for individual average (IA) OLS times (IA-OLS: the average of the OLS times obtained for both legs of an individual). According to ROC analysis without age adjustment, when the IA-OLS time was ~9 s, the sum of the sensitivity and specificity of the test was highest. However, because of a statistically significant difference in IA-OLS time among the three age groups (aged ≤70, aged >70 and ≤75, and aged >75), we determined the optimal cutoff value for IA-OLS time for each of the three age groups using ROC analysis. According to additional ROC analysis, the optimal cutoff for IA-OLS time was 19 s for individuals aged ≤70, 10 s for individuals aged >70 and ≤75, and 6 s for individuals aged >75 when screening elderly persons for locomotive syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose using a GLFS-25 score of 16 and/or a cutoff for the IA-OLS time of 19 s for individuals aged ≤70, 10 s for individuals aged >70 and ≤75, and 6 s for individuals aged >75 when screening elderly persons to determine who should receive medical intervention or undergoing training programs.

摘要

目的

确定用于筛查老年人是否患有运动机能综合征的单腿站立(OLS)测试(睁眼)的截止时间。

方法

招募年龄均≥65岁的骨科门诊患者和健康志愿者。参与者被要求完成25个问题的老年运动机能功能量表(GLFS - 25),然后进行OLS测试。根据先前确定的GLFS - 25截止值,将参与者分为两组:运动机能综合征组和非运动机能综合征组(GLFS - 25得分分别≥16和<16)。使用传统的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析来计算OLS的最佳截止时间。

结果

分析了880名个体的数据(261名男性,619名女性;平均年龄(标准差),77(6)岁;范围65 - 96岁);497人在运动机能综合征组,383人在非运动机能综合征组。两组个体平均(IA)OLS时间的组均值之间存在显著差异(IA - OLS:个体双腿获得的OLS时间的平均值)。根据未进行年龄调整的ROC分析,当IA - OLS时间约为9秒时,测试的灵敏度和特异度之和最高。然而,由于三个年龄组(年龄≤70岁、年龄>70岁且≤75岁、年龄>75岁)的IA - OLS时间存在统计学显著差异,我们使用ROC分析确定了三个年龄组各自的IA - OLS时间最佳截止值。根据额外的ROC分析,在筛查老年人运动机能综合征时,年龄≤70岁个体的IA - OLS时间最佳截止值为19秒,年龄>70岁且≤75岁个体为10秒,年龄>75岁个体为6秒。

结论

我们建议在筛查老年人以确定谁应接受医学干预或参加培训项目时,使用GLFS - 25得分16分和/或IA - OLS时间截止值:年龄≤70岁个体为19秒,年龄>70岁且≤75岁个体为10秒,年龄>75岁个体为6秒。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验