Suppr超能文献

美国急诊科留观实践的横断面研究。

A cross-sectional study of emergency department boarding practices in the United States.

机构信息

The Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2014 May;21(5):497-503. doi: 10.1111/acem.12375.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The median emergency department (ED) boarding time for admitted patients has been a nationally reportable core measure that now also affects ED accreditation and reimbursement. However, no direct national probability samples of ED boarding data have been available to guide this policy until now. The authors studied new National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) survey items to establish baseline values, to generate hypotheses for future research, and to help improve survey quality in the future.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, multistage, stratified annual analysis of EDs and ED visits from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey public use files from 2007 to 2010, a total of 139,502 visit records. These data represent the only national measure of ED boarding. The main outcome of interest was boarding duration for individual patient visits. Data analyses accounted for complex sampling design.

RESULTS

The national median boarding time was 79 minutes, with an interquartile range of 36 to 145 minutes. The prevalence of boarding for more than 2 hours among admitted patients was 32% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 30% to 35%). Average ED volume, occupancy, acuity, and hospital admission rates increased abruptly from the second to the third quartile of median boarding duration. The half of hospitals with the longest median boarding times accounted for 73% of ED visits and 79% of ED hospitalizations nationally. Thirty-nine percent of EDs (95% CI = 32% to 46%) reported never holding patients for more than 2 hours, but visit-level analysis at these EDs found that 21% of admissions did in fact stay in the ED over 2 hours. Only 19% of EDs (95% CI = 16% to 22%) used a strategy of moving admitted patients to alternative sites in the hospital during crowded times.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national survey, ED boarding of admitted patients disproportionately affects hospitals with higher ED volumes, which also see sicker patients who wait longer to be seen, but not hospitals with higher proportions of Medicaid or uninsured visits. This finding implies that, unlike other quality measures, there is a negative volume-outcome relationship for timely hospitalization from the ED.

摘要

目的

住院患者在急诊部(ED)的平均留观时间一直是一个全国性的报告核心指标,现在也影响到 ED 的认证和报销。然而,直到现在,才出现了直接针对 ED 留观数据的全国概率抽样。作者研究了新的国家医院门诊医疗调查(NHAMCS)调查项目,以建立基线值,为未来的研究提出假设,并帮助提高未来调查的质量。

方法

这是 2007 年至 2010 年期间使用国家医院门诊医疗调查公共使用文件进行的横断面、多阶段、分层年度 ED 和 ED 就诊分析,共涉及 139502 次就诊记录。这些数据代表了唯一的全国性 ED 留观测量指标。主要观察结果是每位患者就诊的留观时间。数据分析考虑了复杂的抽样设计。

结果

全国中位数的留观时间为 79 分钟,四分位间距为 36 至 145 分钟。住院患者留观超过 2 小时的比例为 32%(95%置信区间[CI]为 30%至 35%)。ED 容量、入住率、严重程度和住院率从留观中位数的第二四分位数到第三四分位数急剧增加。留观时间中位数最长的一半医院占全国 ED 就诊量的 73%和 ED 住院量的 79%。39%(95%CI=32%至 46%)的 ED 报告从未有过超过 2 小时的留观患者,但这些 ED 的就诊水平分析发现,21%的住院患者实际上在 ED 留观超过 2 小时。只有 19%(95%CI=16%至 22%)的 ED 使用在拥挤时段将住院患者转移到医院其他场所的策略。

结论

在这项全国性调查中,住院患者在 ED 的留观时间不成比例地影响到 ED 容量较高的医院,这些医院的患者病情更严重,等待时间更长,但不受 ED 中 Medicaid 或无保险就诊比例的影响。这一发现表明,与其他质量指标不同,从 ED 及时住院与负面的量效关系有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验