Swindell William R, Xing Xianying, Voorhees John J, Elder James T, Johnston Andrew, Gudjonsson Johann E
Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Physiol Genomics. 2014 Aug 1;46(15):533-46. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00022.2014. Epub 2014 May 20.
Gene expression profiling of psoriasis has driven research advances and may soon provide the basis for clinical applications. For expression profiling studies, RNA-seq is now a competitive technology, but RNA-seq results may differ from those obtained by microarray. We therefore compared findings obtained by RNA-seq with those from eight microarray studies of psoriasis. RNA-seq and microarray datasets identified similar numbers of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with certain genes uniquely identified by each technology. Correspondence between platforms and the balance of increased to decreased DEGs was influenced by mRNA abundance, GC content, and gene length. Weakly expressed genes, genes with low GC content, and long genes were all biased toward decreased expression in psoriasis lesions. The strength of these trends differed among array datasets, most likely due to variations in RNA quality. Gene length bias was by far the strongest trend and was evident in all datasets regardless of the expression profiling technology. The effect was due to differences between lesional and uninvolved skin with respect to the genome-wide correlation between gene length and gene expression, which was consistently more negative in psoriasis lesions. These findings demonstrate the complementary nature of RNA-seq and microarray technology and show that integrative analysis of both data types can provide a richer view of the transcriptome than strict reliance on a single method alone. Our results also highlight factors affecting correspondence between technologies, and we have established that gene length is a major determinant of differential expression in psoriasis lesions.
银屑病的基因表达谱分析推动了研究进展,且可能很快为临床应用提供依据。对于表达谱分析研究而言,RNA测序如今是一项具有竞争力的技术,但RNA测序结果可能与通过微阵列获得的结果有所不同。因此,我们将RNA测序获得的结果与八项关于银屑病的微阵列研究结果进行了比较。RNA测序和微阵列数据集鉴定出的差异表达基因数量相似,每种技术都能独特地鉴定出某些基因。平台之间的一致性以及差异表达基因增加与减少的平衡受到mRNA丰度、GC含量和基因长度的影响。低表达基因、低GC含量基因和长基因在银屑病皮损中均倾向于表达降低。这些趋势的强度在不同的阵列数据集中有所不同,很可能是由于RNA质量的差异。基因长度偏差是迄今为止最明显的趋势,在所有数据集中均很明显,无论采用何种表达谱分析技术。这种效应是由于皮损与非皮损皮肤在基因长度和基因表达的全基因组相关性方面存在差异,在银屑病皮损中这种相关性始终更呈负相关。这些发现证明了RNA测序和微阵列技术的互补性,并表明对两种数据类型进行综合分析能够比单纯严格依赖单一方法提供更丰富的转录组视图。我们的结果还突出了影响技术间一致性的因素,并且我们已确定基因长度是银屑病皮损中差异表达的主要决定因素。