Caulfield Timothy, Rachul Christen, Nelson Erin
Health Law and Science Policy Group, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Alberta, Canada .
Biopreserv Biobank. 2012 Oct;10(5):433-8. doi: 10.1089/bio.2012.0029.
While the development of large scale biobanks continues, ethics and policy challenges persist. Debate surrounds key issues such as giving and withdrawing consent, incidental findings and return of results, and ownership and control of tissue samples. Studies of public perception have demonstrated a lack of consensus on these issues, particularly in different jurisdictions. We conducted a telephone survey of members of the public in Alberta, Canada. The survey addressed the aforementioned issues, but also explored public trust in the individuals and institutions involved in biobanking research. Results show that the Alberta public is fairly consistent in their responses and that those who preferred a broad consent model were also less likely to desire continuing control and a right to withdraw samples. The study raises questions about the role of public perceptions and opinions, particularly in the absence of consensus.
在大规模生物样本库不断发展的同时,伦理和政策挑战依然存在。围绕关键问题存在诸多争论,如给予和撤回同意、偶然发现及结果反馈,以及组织样本的所有权和控制权等。公众认知研究表明,在这些问题上缺乏共识,尤其是在不同司法管辖区。我们对加拿大艾伯塔省的公众进行了电话调查。该调查涉及上述问题,还探讨了公众对参与生物样本库研究的个人和机构的信任。结果显示,艾伯塔省公众的回答相当一致,那些倾向于广泛同意模式的人也不太可能希望持续控制样本以及拥有撤回样本的权利。该研究引发了关于公众认知和意见作用的问题,尤其是在缺乏共识的情况下。