La Greca Gaetano, Sofia Maria, Primo Stefano, Randazzo Valentina, Lombardo Rosario, Russello Domenico
Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania - General Surgery and Minivasive HPB Surgery, Cannizzaro Hospital Via Messina 829, 95100 Catania, Italy.
Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania - General Surgery and Minivasive HPB Surgery, Cannizzaro Hospital Via Messina 829, 95100 Catania, Italy.
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5(7):347-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
Many surgical options exist to treat rectal prolapse with different indications, feasibility and results in urgent and complicated cases. These include perineal or abdominal approaches including rectopexy with or without resection. Perineal approaches have reduced surgical invasivity and hospital stay if compared to transabdominal approaches by open surgery or laparoscopy. Up to now there was still a clear dividing line for surgical treatment between the perineal approach, used more for complicated emergency case while the transabdominal open, or laparoscopic approach more common in elective surgery, but more complex to perform.
A 37 year old female patient affected by psychiatric disease presented with an unreducible second recurrence of a complicated rectal prolapse. The patient was treated with a third Altemeier procedure but now performed under laparoscopic control. The patient recovered promptly without any complication or recurrence up to the 24 months follow-up.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report describing the combined laparoscopic-perineal approach for the treatment of a complicated recurrence of rectal prolapse. The technical feasibility, the rapidity, the optimal outcome and the rationale behind this option all suggest that this laparoscopic assistance certainly allows an implementation of the effectiveness, safety and results of an established effective perineal approach.
This combined approach has the advantage of maintaining the simplicity and rapidity of conventional perineal surgery, adding the advantages of abdominal control and avoiding the risks, the invasivity, and the longer duration of more complex laparoscopic procedures.
治疗直肠脱垂有多种手术选择,在紧急和复杂病例中有不同的适应症、可行性和结果。这些包括会阴或腹部手术入路,包括有或无切除术的直肠固定术。与通过开放手术或腹腔镜进行的经腹手术入路相比,会阴手术入路降低了手术侵袭性和住院时间。到目前为止,在手术治疗方面,会阴手术入路(更多用于复杂的紧急情况)和经腹开放或腹腔镜手术入路(在择期手术中更常见,但操作更复杂)之间仍有明显的分界线。
一名37岁患有精神疾病的女性患者出现复杂直肠脱垂的不可回纳性二次复发。该患者接受了第三次Altemeier手术,但此次是在腹腔镜控制下进行的。患者恢复迅速,在24个月的随访中无任何并发症或复发。
据我们所知,这是第一例描述联合腹腔镜-会阴手术入路治疗复杂直肠脱垂复发的病例报告。该手术的技术可行性、快速性、最佳结果以及此选择背后的基本原理均表明,这种腹腔镜辅助确实能够提高已确立的有效会阴手术入路的有效性、安全性和效果。
这种联合手术入路具有保持传统会阴手术的简单性和快速性的优点,增加了腹部控制的优势,避免了更复杂腹腔镜手术的风险、侵袭性和更长的手术时间。