Suppr超能文献

基于人群的生殖基因筛查中知情选择的衡量:一项系统综述。

Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review.

作者信息

Ames Alice Grace, Metcalfe Sylvia Ann, Dalton Archibald Alison, Duncan Rony Emily, Emery Jon

机构信息

1] Genetics Education and Health Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia [2] Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

1] Genetics Education and Health Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia [2] Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia [3] Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Jan;23(1):8-21. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.89. Epub 2014 May 21.

Abstract

Genetic screening and health-care guidelines recommend that programmes should facilitate informed choice. It is therefore important that accurate measures of informed choice are available to evaluate such programmes. This review synthesises and appraises measures used to evaluate informed choice in population-based genetic screening programmes for reproductive risk. Databases were searched for studies offering genetic screening for the purpose of establishing reproductive risk to an adult population sample, in which aspects of informed choice were measured. Studies were included if, at a minimum, measures of uptake of screening and knowledge were used. Searches identified 1462 citations and 76 studies were reviewed in full text; 34 studies met the inclusion criteria. Over 20 different measures of informed choice were used. Many measures lacked adequate validity and reliability data. This systematic review will inform future evaluation of informed choice in population genetic screening programmes.

摘要

基因筛查与医疗保健指南建议,相关项目应促进知情选择。因此,提供准确的知情选择衡量标准对于评估此类项目很重要。本综述综合并评估了用于评估基于人群的生殖风险基因筛查项目中知情选择的衡量标准。检索数据库以查找针对成年人群样本开展基因筛查以确定生殖风险的研究,这些研究中对知情选择的各个方面进行了衡量。若至少使用了筛查接受率和知识的衡量标准,则纳入这些研究。检索共识别出1462条引文,对76项研究进行了全文审查;34项研究符合纳入标准。使用了20多种不同的知情选择衡量标准。许多衡量标准缺乏充分的效度和信度数据。本系统综述将为未来人群基因筛查项目中知情选择的评估提供参考。

相似文献

1
Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Jan;23(1):8-21. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.89. Epub 2014 May 21.
2
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD001865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001865.pub3.
3
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD001865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001865.pub2.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
7
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about entering screening programs.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD001865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001865.
8
Disclosing to parents newborn carrier status identified by routine blood spot screening.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD003859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003859.pub2.
9
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
10
Pre-deployment programmes for building resilience in military and frontline emergency service personnel.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 6;12(12):CD013242. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013242.pub2.

引用本文的文献

3
Educational tools support informed decision-making for genetic carrier screening in a heterogenic Israeli population.
J Community Genet. 2024 Apr;15(2):137-146. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00694-4. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
5
Understanding the experiences and perspectives of prenatal screening among a diverse cohort.
Prenat Diagn. 2023 May;43(5):605-612. doi: 10.1002/pd.6297. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
7
Barriers and Facilitators for Population Genetic Screening in Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review.
Front Genet. 2022 Jul 4;13:865384. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.865384. eCollection 2022.
8
Couples' experiences with expanded carrier screening: evaluation of a university hospital screening offer.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Aug;29(8):1252-1258. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00923-9. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
9
Current attitudes and preconceptions towards expanded carrier screening in the Eastern Chinese reproductive-aged population.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Mar;38(3):697-707. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-02032-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
A tiered-layered-staged model for informed consent in personal genome testing.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Jun;21(6):596-601. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.237. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
3
Dichotomizing continuous variables in statistical analysis: a practice to avoid.
Med Decis Making. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):225-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12437605.
5
Meeting patients' education and decision-making needs for first trimester prenatal aneuploidy screening.
Prenat Diagn. 2011 Dec;31(13):1222-8. doi: 10.1002/pd.2867. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
8
Knowledge of prenatal screening and psychological management of test decisions.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;38(2):152-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.8856.
9
First-trimester Down syndrome screening: pregnant women's knowledge.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;38(2):145-51. doi: 10.1002/uog.8839.
10
Are adolescents' decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome informed? A controlled, prospective study.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011 Feb;24(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Aug 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验