Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Prenat Diagn. 2023 May;43(5):605-612. doi: 10.1002/pd.6297. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
Rapid advances in prenatal genetic screening technology make it difficult for providers to deliver adequate prenatal counseling. The aim of this study was to understand how prenatal screening educational approaches can meet the needs of patients.
Qualitative content analysis was conducted on a diverse population who were interviewed to explore their perceived experiences and preferences for prenatal screening educational delivery.
Twenty-two women from three US sites were interviewed. Participants were racially/ethnically diverse with 22.7% identifying as Black or African American (n = 5), 40.9% as Hispanic (n = 9), and 4.5% as Pacific Islander (n = 1). Four themes were identified: prenatal screening education, prenatal screening decision-making, return of results, and suggestions for creating a decision aid. Most results were consistent with previous research not targeting a diverse population.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that learning style preferences vary between patients and that current methods are not consistently satisfying patient's desire for understanding, particularly with 'high-risk' results, suggesting that a standardized tool could improve knowledge and decrease decisional conflict. This diverse cohort suggested a list and description of each of the testing options offered, information about each condition being screened for, a timeline for the testing and return of results, costs associated, and non-technical language.
产前基因筛查技术的快速发展使得医疗服务提供者难以提供充分的产前咨询。本研究旨在了解产前筛查教育方法如何满足患者的需求。
对来自三个美国地点的不同人群进行了定性内容分析,以探讨他们对产前筛查教育提供方式的感知经验和偏好。
对 22 名女性进行了采访。参与者在种族/民族方面存在多样性,其中 22.7%为黑人或非裔美国人(n=5),40.9%为西班牙裔(n=9),4.5%为太平洋岛民(n=1)。确定了四个主题:产前筛查教育、产前筛查决策、结果回报和创建决策辅助工具的建议。大多数结果与非针对多样化人群的先前研究一致。
讨论/结论:我们的结果表明,学习方式偏好因人而异,而目前的方法并不能始终满足患者对理解的渴望,特别是对于“高风险”结果,这表明标准化工具可以提高知识水平并减少决策冲突。这个多样化的群体建议列出并描述所提供的每一种检测选择、每种筛查疾病的信息、检测和结果回报的时间表、相关费用以及非技术性语言。