Llanos Adana A, Pennell Michael L, Young Gregory S, Tatum Cathy M, Katz Mira L, Paskett Electra D
Division of Population Sciences, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA Department of Epidemiology, RBHS-School of Public Health and the Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Jun;37(2):322-7. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu031. Epub 2014 May 20.
Limited data are available on the association between colorectal cancer (CRC) worry and CRC screening uptake, particularly in rural and underserved populations where there is an excess burden of CRC.
Between September 2009 and March 2010, we conducted a cross-sectional study among a randomly selected sample of Appalachian Ohio residents aged 51-75 years (n= 1084). We also reviewed their medical records. Multivariable-adjusted models examined the association between CRC worry and screening by medical record review, assessed effect modification by CRC worry and determined the correlates of higher CRC worry.
Approximately 50% of participants were adherent to CRC screening guidelines. There was no significant association between higher CRC worry and screening adherence [odds ratio (OR) = 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-2.02]. CRC worry did not modify the association between any covariate and screening adherence. Participants who were unemployed/disabled (OR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.34-3.45) and had higher CRC risk perception (OR = 3.49, 95% CI: 2.19-5.56) had higher odds of moderate-to-extreme worry.
These findings highlight the need for meaningful exploration of why higher CRC worry is not associated with adherence to CRC screening, particularly in rural, medically underserved populations. Development and implementation of interventions to increase CRC screening in such areas is a significant public health priority.
关于结直肠癌(CRC)担忧与CRC筛查接受度之间的关联,现有数据有限,尤其是在CRC负担过重的农村和服务不足人群中。
2009年9月至2010年3月期间,我们对俄亥俄州阿巴拉契亚地区随机抽取的1084名年龄在51 - 75岁的居民进行了横断面研究。我们还查阅了他们的病历。多变量调整模型通过病历审查研究了CRC担忧与筛查之间的关联,评估了CRC担忧的效应修饰作用,并确定了CRC高担忧的相关因素。
约50%的参与者遵守了CRC筛查指南。CRC高担忧与筛查依从性之间无显著关联[比值比(OR)= 1.32,95%置信区间(CI):0.86 - 2.02]。CRC担忧并未改变任何协变量与筛查依从性之间的关联。失业/残疾的参与者(OR = 2.15,95% CI:1.34 - 3.45)以及CRC风险感知较高的参与者(OR = 3.49,95% CI:2.19 - 5.56)出现中度至极度担忧的几率更高。
这些发现凸显了有必要深入探究为何CRC高担忧与CRC筛查依从性无关,尤其是在农村医疗服务不足的人群中。制定并实施干预措施以提高此类地区的CRC筛查率是一项重大的公共卫生优先事项。