Pérez-Cuevas Ricardo, Doubova Svetlana V, Wirtz Veronika J, Servan-Mori Edson, Dreser Anahí, Hernández-Ávila Mauricio
Division of Social Protection and Health, Inter-American Development Bank, Mexico, Mexico.
Epidemiology and Health Services Research Unit, CMN Siglo XXI, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico, Mexico.
BMJ Open. 2014 May 22;4(5):e004669. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004669.
To compare the sociodemographic characteristics, reasons for attending, perception of quality and associated out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures of doctors' offices adjacent to private pharmacies (DAPPs) users with users of Social Security (SS), Ministry of Health (MoH), private doctor's offices independent from pharmacies and non-users.
Secondary data analysis of the 2012 National Survey of Health and Nutrition of Mexico.
The study population comprised 25 852 individuals identified as having had a health problem 15 days before the survey, and a random sample of 12 799 ambulatory health service users.
Sociodemographic characteristics, reasons for attending healthcare services, perception of quality and associated OOP expenditures.
The distribution of users was as follows: DAPPs (9.2%), SS (16.1%), MoH (20.9%), private providers (15.4%) and non-users (38.5%); 65% of DAPP users were affiliated with a public institution (MoH 35%, SS 30%) and 35% reported not having health coverage. DAPP users considered the services inexpensive, convenient and with a short waiting time, yet they received ≥3 medications more often (67.2%, 95% CI 64.2% to 70.1%) than users of private doctors (55.7%, 95% CI 52.5% to 58.6%) and public institutions (SS 53.8%, 95% CI 51.6% to 55.9%; MoH 44.7%, 95% CI 42.5% to 47.0%). The probability of spending on consultations (88%, 95% CI 86% to 89%) and on medicines (97%, 95% CI 96% to 98%) was much higher for DAPP users when compared with SS (2%, 95% CI 2% to 3% and 12%, 95% CI 11% to 14%, respectively) and MoH users (11%, 95% CI 9% to 12% and 32%, 95% CI 30% to 34%, respectively).
DAPPs counteract current financial protection policies since a significant percentage of their users were affiliated with a public institution, reported higher OOP spending and higher number of medicines prescribed than users of other providers. The overprescription should prompt studies to learn about DAPPs' quality of care, which may arise from the conflict of interest implicit in the linkage of prescribing and dispensing processes.
比较毗邻私人药房的医生诊所(DAPPs)使用者与社会保障(SS)机构、卫生部(MoH)、独立于药房的私人医生诊所使用者及非使用者在社会人口学特征、就诊原因、对医疗质量的认知以及相关自付费用方面的差异。
对2012年墨西哥全国健康与营养调查的二次数据分析。
研究人群包括在调查前15天被确定患有健康问题的25852人,以及12799名门诊医疗服务使用者的随机样本。
社会人口学特征、就诊医疗服务的原因、对医疗质量的认知以及相关自付费用。
使用者分布如下:DAPPs(9.2%)、SS(16.1%)、MoH(20.9%)、私人医疗机构(15.4%)和非使用者(38.5%);65%的DAPP使用者隶属于公共机构(MoH占35%,SS占30%),35%的使用者表示没有医保。DAPP使用者认为服务价格低廉、方便且等待时间短,但他们比私人医生使用者(55.7%,95%CI 52.5%至58.6%)和公共机构使用者(SS为53.8%,95%CI 51.6%至55.9%;MoH为44.7%,95%CI 42.5%至47.0%)更常接受≥3种药物治疗(67.2%,95%CI 64.2%至70.1%)。与SS使用者(分别为2%,95%CI 2%至3%和12%,95%CI 11%至14%)和MoH使用者(分别为11%,95%CI 9%至12%和32%,95%CI 30%至34%)相比,DAPP使用者进行会诊付费(88%,95%CI 86%至89%)和药品付费(97%,95%CI 96%至98%)的概率要高得多。
DAPPs与当前的财务保护政策相悖,因为其相当一部分使用者隶属于公共机构,与其他医疗机构使用者相比,他们报告的自付费用更高,开具的药物数量也更多。过度开药现象应促使开展研究,以了解DAPPs的医疗质量,这可能源于开药和配药流程关联中隐含的利益冲突。