Suppr超能文献

与弱势孕妇和新妈妈成功开展社区互动的“有效要素”:一项定性比较分析

The 'active ingredients' for successful community engagement with disadvantaged expectant and new mothers: a qualitative comparative analysis.

作者信息

Brunton Ginny, O'Mara-Eves Alison, Thomas James

机构信息

EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2014 Dec;70(12):2847-60. doi: 10.1111/jan.12441. Epub 2014 May 22.

Abstract

AIMS

To explore which conditions of community engagement are implicated in effective interventions targeting disadvantaged pregnant women and new mothers.

BACKGROUND

Adaptive experiences during pregnancy and the early years are key to reducing health inequalities in women and children worldwide. Public health nurses, health visitors and community midwives are well placed to address such disadvantage, often using community engagement strategies. Such interventions are complex; however, and we need to better understand which aspects of community engagement are aligned with effectiveness.

DESIGN

Qualitative comparative analysis conducted in 2013, of trials data included in a recently published systematic review.

METHODS

Two reviewers agreed on relevant conditions from 24 maternity or early years intervention studies examining four models of community engagement. Effect size estimates were converted into 'fuzzy' effectiveness categories and truth tables were constructed. Using fsQCA software, Boolean minimization identified solution sets. Random effects multiple regression and fsQCA were conducted to rule out risk of methodological bias.

RESULTS/FINDINGS: Studies focused on antenatal, immunization, breastfeeding and early professional intervention outcomes. Peer delivery (consistency 0·83; unique coverage 0·63); and mother-professional collaboration (consistency 0·833; unique coverage 0·21) were moderately aligned with effective interventions. Community-identified health need plus consultation/collaboration in intervention design and leading on delivery were weakly aligned with 'not effective' interventions (consistency 0·78; unique coverage 0·29).

CONCLUSIONS

For disadvantaged new and expectant mothers, peer or collaborative delivery models could be used in interventions. A need exists to design and test community engagement interventions in other areas of maternity and early years care and to further evaluate models of empowerment.

摘要

目的

探讨在针对弱势孕妇和初为人母者的有效干预措施中,社区参与的哪些条件与之相关。

背景

孕期及早年的适应性经历是减少全球妇女和儿童健康不平等现象的关键。公共卫生护士、健康访视员和社区助产士处于有利位置来解决此类不利状况,通常会采用社区参与策略。然而,此类干预措施较为复杂,我们需要更好地理解社区参与的哪些方面与有效性相关。

设计

2013年对最近发表的一项系统评价中纳入的试验数据进行定性比较分析。

方法

两位评审员就24项孕产妇或早年干预研究中的相关条件达成一致,这些研究考察了四种社区参与模式。将效应量估计值转换为“模糊”的有效性类别,并构建真值表。使用fsQCA软件,通过布尔最小化确定解集。进行随机效应多元回归和fsQCA以排除方法学偏倚的风险。

结果/发现:研究聚焦于产前、免疫接种、母乳喂养和早期专业干预结果。同伴分娩(一致性0·83;独特覆盖率0·63);以及母婴专业合作(一致性0·833;独特覆盖率0·21)与有效干预措施适度相关。社区确定的健康需求加上干预设计中的咨询/合作以及主导实施与“无效”干预措施弱相关(一致性0·78;独特覆盖率0·29)。

结论

对于弱势新妈妈和准妈妈,干预措施可采用同伴或合作分娩模式。有必要在孕产妇和早年护理的其他领域设计和测试社区参与干预措施,并进一步评估赋权模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验