• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估社区层面干预措施以提高孕期产前保健的早期启动率:社区拓展研究方案,一项包含综合过程和经济评估的整群随机对照试验

Evaluation of community-level interventions to increase early initiation of antenatal care in pregnancy: protocol for the Community REACH study, a cluster randomised controlled trial with integrated process and economic evaluations.

作者信息

Sawtell Mary, Sweeney Lorna, Wiggins Meg, Salisbury Cathryn, Eldridge Sandra, Greenberg Lauren, Hunter Rachael, Kaur Inderjeet, McCourt Christine, Hatherall Bethan, Findlay Gail, Morris Joanne, Reading Sandra, Renton Adrian, Adekoya Ruth, Green Belinda, Harvey Belinda, Latham Sarah, Patel Kanta, Vanlessen Logan, Harden Angela

机构信息

Social Science Research Unit (SSRU), UCL Institute of Education, University College London, 18 Woburn Square, London, WC1H 0NR, UK.

Institute for Health and Human Development, University House, UH250, Stratford Campus, University of East London, Stratford Campus, London, E12 4LZ, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2018 Mar 5;19(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2526-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-018-2526-6
PMID:29506563
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5838929/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The provision of high-quality maternity services is a priority for reducing inequalities in health outcomes for mothers and infants. Best practice includes women having their initial antenatal appointment within the first trimester of pregnancy in order to provide screening and support for healthy lifestyles, well-being and self-care in pregnancy. Previous research has identified inequalities in access to antenatal care, yet there is little evidence on interventions to improve early initiation of antenatal care. The Community REACH trial will assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of engaging communities in the co-production and delivery of an intervention that addresses this issue.

METHODS/DESIGN: The study design is a matched cluster randomised controlled trial with integrated process and economic evaluations. The unit of randomisation is electoral ward. The intervention will be delivered in 10 wards; 10 comparator wards will have normal practice. The primary outcome is the proportion of pregnant women attending their antenatal booking appointment by the 12th completed week of pregnancy. This and a number of secondary outcomes will be assessed for cohorts of women (n = approximately 1450 per arm) who give birth 2-7 and 8-13 months after intervention delivery completion in the included wards, using routinely collected maternity data. Eight hospitals commissioned to provide maternity services in six NHS trusts in north and east London and Essex have been recruited to the study. These trusts will provide anonymised routine data for randomisation and outcomes analysis. The process evaluation will examine intervention implementation, acceptability, reach and possible causal pathways. The economic evaluation will use a cost-consequences analysis and decision model to evaluate the intervention. Targeted community engagement in the research process was a priority.

DISCUSSION

Community REACH aims to increase early initiation of antenatal care using an intervention that is co-produced and delivered by local communities. This pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, with integrated process and economic evaluation, aims to rigorously assess the effectiveness of this public health intervention, which is particularly complex due to the required combination of standardisation with local flexibility. It will also answer questions about scalability and generalisability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN registry: registration number 63066975 . Registered on 18 August 2015.

摘要

背景

提供高质量的孕产妇服务是减少母婴健康结果不平等现象的优先事项。最佳做法包括妇女在怀孕的头三个月内进行首次产前检查,以便为孕期的健康生活方式、福祉和自我护理提供筛查和支持。先前的研究已经确定了获得产前护理方面的不平等现象,但几乎没有证据表明有哪些干预措施可以改善产前护理的早期开始。社区REACH试验将评估让社区共同参与制定和实施一项解决该问题的干预措施的有效性和成本效益。

方法/设计:本研究设计为一项匹配整群随机对照试验,同时进行综合过程和经济评估。随机分组的单位是选区。干预措施将在10个选区实施;10个对照选区将维持常规做法。主要结局是在怀孕满12周时进行产前预约就诊的孕妇比例。对于在纳入选区完成干预措施实施后2至7个月和8至13个月分娩的女性队列(每组约1450人),将使用常规收集的孕产妇数据来评估这一结局以及一些次要结局。已招募了八家受委托在伦敦北部和东部以及埃塞克斯郡的六个国民保健服务信托基金中提供孕产妇服务的医院参与该研究。这些信托基金将提供用于随机分组和结局分析的匿名常规数据。过程评估将考察干预措施的实施情况、可接受性、覆盖范围以及可能的因果途径。经济评估将使用成本后果分析和决策模型来评估干预措施。在研究过程中有针对性地让社区参与是一个优先事项。

讨论

社区REACH旨在通过一项由当地社区共同制定和实施的干预措施来提高产前护理的早期开始率。这项务实的整群随机对照试验,同时进行综合过程和经济评估,旨在严格评估这项公共卫生干预措施的有效性,由于需要将标准化与当地灵活性相结合,这项干预措施特别复杂。它还将回答有关可扩展性和普遍性的问题。

试验注册

国际标准随机对照试验编号注册库:注册号63066975。于2015年8月18日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f048/5838929/5b84917aecd6/13063_2018_2526_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f048/5838929/5b84917aecd6/13063_2018_2526_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f048/5838929/5b84917aecd6/13063_2018_2526_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of community-level interventions to increase early initiation of antenatal care in pregnancy: protocol for the Community REACH study, a cluster randomised controlled trial with integrated process and economic evaluations.评估社区层面干预措施以提高孕期产前保健的早期启动率:社区拓展研究方案,一项包含综合过程和经济评估的整群随机对照试验
Trials. 2018 Mar 5;19(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2526-6.
2
Group antenatal care (Pregnancy Circles) for diverse and disadvantaged women: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluations.多人群体产前保健(妊娠圈)对不同和弱势女性的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案,包括综合过程和经济评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):919. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05751-z.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Methods for economic evaluation alongside a multicentre trial in developing countries: a case study from the WHO Antenatal Care Randomised Controlled Trial.发展中国家多中心试验中的经济评估方法:来自世界卫生组织产前护理随机对照试验的案例研究
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;12 Suppl 2:75-97. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00008.x.
5
The UK stand together trial: protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa to reduce bullying in primary schools.英国团结试验:一项多中心集群随机对照试验的方案,旨在评估 KiVa 在减少小学欺凌方面的有效性和成本效益。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;22(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12642-x.
6
Community mobilisation with women's groups facilitated by Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) to improve maternal and newborn health in underserved areas of Jharkhand and Orissa: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial.认证社会卫生活动家(ASHA)协助妇女团体进行社区动员,以改善恰尔康得邦和奥里萨邦服务不足地区的孕产妇和新生儿健康:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2011 Jul 25;12:182. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-182.
7
The WHO antenatal care randomised controlled trial: rationale and study design.世界卫生组织产前护理随机对照试验:原理与研究设计。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;12 Suppl 2:27-58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00006.x.
8
Measuring fidelity, feasibility, costs: an implementation evaluation of a cluster-controlled trial of group antenatal care in rural Nepal.测量一致性、可行性和成本:尼泊尔农村地区群组产前护理的群组对照试验的实施评估。
Reprod Health. 2020 Jan 17;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0840-4.
9
Effect of implementation strategies on the routine provision of antenatal care addressing smoking in pregnancy: study protocol for a non-randomised stepped-wedge cluster controlled trial.实施策略对常规提供产前护理以解决妊娠期间吸烟问题的影响:一项非随机阶梯式楔形集群对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 5;14(4):e076725. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076725.
10
Conditional cash transfers to retain rural Kenyan women in the continuum of care during pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.有条件现金转移支付以促使肯尼亚农村妇女在孕期、分娩期及产后持续接受护理:一项整群随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2019 Mar 1;20(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3224-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to seeking and engaging with antenatal care in high-income countries: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research.高收入国家寻求和参与产前保健的促进因素和障碍:定性研究的元综合。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e3810-e3828. doi: 10.1111/hsc.14072. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
2
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
3
Using electronic patient records to assess the effect of a complex antenatal intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial-data management experience from the DESiGN Trial team.

本文引用的文献

1
Timing of the initiation of antenatal care: An exploratory qualitative study of women and service providers in East London.产前护理开始的时机:对东伦敦女性及服务提供者的探索性定性研究
Midwifery. 2016 May;36:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.017. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
2
Experiences, utilisation and outcomes of maternity care in England among women from different socio-economic groups: findings from the 2010 National Maternity Survey.英格兰不同社会经济群体女性的孕产护理体验、利用情况和结局:2010 年全国孕产调查结果。
BJOG. 2015 Nov;122(12):1610-7. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13059. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
3
The 'active ingredients' for successful community engagement with disadvantaged expectant and new mothers: a qualitative comparative analysis.
利用电子病历评估一项产前综合干预措施的效果:DESiGN 试验团队的一项群组随机对照试验的数据管理经验。
Trials. 2021 Mar 8;22(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05141-8.
4
Group antenatal care (Pregnancy Circles) for diverse and disadvantaged women: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluations.多人群体产前保健(妊娠圈)对不同和弱势女性的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案,包括综合过程和经济评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):919. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05751-z.
5
Adjust your own oxygen mask before helping those around you: an autoethnography of participatory research.先调整好自己的氧气面罩,再帮助周围的人:参与式研究的自传体民族志。
Implement Sci. 2020 Sep 3;15(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01002-1.
与弱势孕妇和新妈妈成功开展社区互动的“有效要素”:一项定性比较分析
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Dec;70(12):2847-60. doi: 10.1111/jan.12441. Epub 2014 May 22.
4
Well London Phase-1: results among adults of a cluster-randomised trial of a community engagement approach to improving health behaviours and mental well-being in deprived inner-city neighbourhoods.伦敦第一阶段:一项集群随机试验的成年人群结果,该试验采用社区参与方法改善贫困市中心社区的健康行为和心理健康。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Jul;68(7):606-14. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202505. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
5
Experiencing maternity care: the care received and perceptions of women from different ethnic groups.体验孕产保健服务:不同族裔女性所接受的照护和感受。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Oct 22;13:196. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-196.
6
Predictors of the timing of initiation of antenatal care in an ethnically diverse urban cohort in the UK.英国一个种族多样化的城市队列中产前护理开始时间的预测因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 May 3;13:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-103.
7
SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.SPIRIT 2013 声明:定义临床试验的标准议定书项目。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
8
Inadequate prenatal care utilization and risks of infant mortality and poor birth outcome: a retrospective analysis of 28,729,765 U.S. deliveries over 8 years.不足的产前保健利用与婴儿死亡率和不良出生结局风险:对超过 8 年的 28729765 例美国分娩的回顾性分析。
Am J Perinatol. 2012 Nov;29(10):787-93. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1316439. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
9
'Weighing up and balancing out': a meta-synthesis of barriers to antenatal care for marginalised women in high-income countries.“权衡与平衡”:高收入国家中边缘化女性产前护理障碍的元综合分析
BJOG. 2009 Mar;116(4):518-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02067.x.
10
Under-attending free antenatal care is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.未充分接受免费产前护理与不良妊娠结局相关。
BMC Public Health. 2007 Sep 27;7:268. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-268.