Tohen Mauricio, Kanba Shigenobu, McIntyre Roger S, Fujikoshi Shinji, Katagiri Hideaki
University of New Mexico, Health Sciences Center, Department of Psychiatry, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Kyushu University, Department of Neuropsychiatry, Fukuoka, Japan; East Asian Bipolar Forum, Fukuoka, Japan.
J Affect Disord. 2014 Aug;164:57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
This analysis investigated the correlations between the efficacy of olanzapine monotherapy and the number of concurrent manic symptoms in patients treated for bipolar depression.
Pooled data from 2 placebo-controlled olanzapine studies in patients with bipolar I depression were analyzed (total 1214 patients; 690 olanzapine monotherapy patients and 524 placebo patients). Patients were categorized for mixed features by the number of concurrent manic symptoms at baseline (0, 1 or 2, and ≥3, respectively, as measured by a Young Mania Rating Scale item score ≥1). Efficacy was evaluated by change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to 6 weeks.
Least-squares mean differences between olanzapine and placebo in the change of MADRS total scores were -3.76 (p=0.002), -3.20 (p<0.001), and -3.44 (p=0.002) for mixed features 0, 1 or 2, and ≥3, respectively. The response rates for olanzapine versus (vs.) placebo were 52.6% vs. 39.8%, 50.3% vs. 40.0%, and 42.2% vs. 33.7% for mixed features 0, 1 or 2, and ≥3, respectively. The remission rates for olanzapine vs. placebo group were 46.1% vs. 34.3%, 39.5% vs. 32.0%, and 34.8% vs. 24.1% for mixed features 0, 1 or 2, and ≥3, respectively. No significant interaction between mixed features and treatment was seen in the MADRS changes or response and remission rates.
Post hoc analyses of the data from 2 previous randomized clinical studies.
Olanzapine monotherapy was shown to be effective in the treatment of bipolar depression irrespective of the presence of concurrent manic symptoms.
本分析研究了在双相抑郁症患者中,奥氮平单药治疗的疗效与同时存在的躁狂症状数量之间的相关性。
分析了两项针对双相I型抑郁症患者的奥氮平安慰剂对照研究的汇总数据(共1214例患者;690例接受奥氮平单药治疗的患者和524例接受安慰剂治疗的患者)。根据基线时同时存在的躁狂症状数量(分别通过杨氏躁狂量表项目得分≥1测量为0、1或2以及≥3)对患者进行混合特征分类。通过蒙哥马利-Åsberg抑郁量表(MADRS)总分从基线到6周的变化来评估疗效。
对于混合特征为0、1或2以及≥3的情况,奥氮平与安慰剂在MADRS总分变化方面的最小二乘均值差异分别为-3.76(p = 0.002)、-3.20(p < 0.001)和-3.44(p = 0.002)。奥氮平与安慰剂相比的缓解率分别为46.1%对34.3%、39.5%对32.0%以及34.8%对24.1%。在MADRS变化或缓解率方面,未观察到混合特征与治疗之间的显著相互作用。
对两项先前随机临床研究的数据进行事后分析。
无论是否存在同时出现的躁狂症状,奥氮平单药治疗在双相抑郁症治疗中均显示有效。