Khatib Malek, Tolosana José M, Trucco Emilce, Borràs Roger, Castel Angeles, Berruezo Antonio, Doltra Adelina, Sitges Marta, Arbelo Elena, Matas Maria, Brugada Josep, Mont Lluís
Thorax Institute, Cardiology Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Jul;16(7):802-9. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.102. Epub 2014 May 23.
The beneficial effects of CRT in patients with advanced heart failure, wide QRS, and low LVEF have been clearly established. Nevertheless, mortality remains high in some patients. The aims of our study were to identify the predictors of mortality in patients treated with CRT and to design a risk score for mortality.
A cohort of 608 consecutive patients treated with CRT from 2000 to 2011 in our centre was prospectively analysed. Baseline clinical and echocardiography variables were analysed and mortality data were collected. During a mean follow-up of 36.2 ± 29.2 months, 174 patients died: 123/174 (71%) due to cardiovascular causes, 25/174 (14%) non-cardiac causes, and 26/174 (15%) unknown aetiology. In a multivariate analysis the predictors of mortality were NYHA class IV [hazard ratio (HR) 2.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-3.7, P < 0.001], glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.14-2.30, P = 0.008), AF (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.19-2.3, P = 0.01), age ≥70 years (HR 1.44, (95% CI 1.04-2.00, P = 0.02), and LVEF <22% (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.33-2.52, P ≤ 0.001). The EAARN score (EF, Age, AF, Renal dysfunction, NYHA class IV) summarizes the predictors. Each additional predictor increased the mortality: one predictor, HR 3.28 (95% CI 1.37-7.8, P = 0.008); two, HR 5.23 (95% CI 2.24-12.10, P < 0.001); three, HR 9.63 (95% CI 4.1-22.60, P < 0.001); and four or more, HR 14.38 (95% CI 5.8-35.65, P < 0.001).
The predictors of mortality have a significant add-on predictive effect on mortality. The EAARN score could be useful to stratify the prognosis of CRT patients.
心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)对晚期心力衰竭、宽QRS波和低左心室射血分数(LVEF)患者的有益作用已得到明确证实。然而,部分患者的死亡率仍然很高。我们研究的目的是确定接受CRT治疗患者的死亡预测因素,并设计一个死亡风险评分。
对2000年至2011年在我们中心连续接受CRT治疗的608例患者进行前瞻性分析。分析基线临床和超声心动图变量,并收集死亡率数据。在平均36.2±29.2个月的随访期间,174例患者死亡:123/174(71%)死于心血管原因,25/174(14%)死于非心脏原因,26/174(15%)病因不明。多变量分析中,死亡预测因素为纽约心脏协会(NYHA)IV级[风险比(HR)2.54,95%置信区间(CI)1.7 - 3.7,P < 0.001]、肾小球滤过率(GFR)<60 mL/min/1.73 m²(HR 1.61,95% CI 1.14 - 2.30,P = 0.008)、心房颤动(AF)(HR 1.67,95% CI 1.19 - 2.3,P = 0.01)、年龄≥70岁(HR 1.44,95% CI 1.04 - 2.00,P = 0.02)以及LVEF<22%(HR 1.83,95% CI 1.33 - 2.52,P≤0.001)。EAARN评分(EF、年龄、AF、肾功能不全、NYHA IV级)总结了这些预测因素。每增加一个预测因素,死亡率就会升高:一个预测因素,HR 3.28(95% CI 1.37 - 7.8,P = 0.008);两个,HR 5.23(95% CI 2.24 - 12.10,P < 0.001);三个,HR 9.63(95% CI 4.1 - 22.60,P < 0.001);四个或更多个,HR 14.38(95% CI 5.8 - 35.65,P < 0.001)。
死亡预测因素对死亡率具有显著的附加预测作用。EAARN评分可能有助于对CRT患者的预后进行分层。