Institute of Hematology "L. and A. Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy.
Institute of Hematology "L. and A. Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy
Oncologist. 2014 Jul;19(7):746-50. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0463. Epub 2014 May 28.
The definition of the role of positron emission tomography (PET) in peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) is still under investigation. The purpose of the present observational retrospective study was to assess the early prognostic value of PET after the first three cycles of therapy (PET+3), evaluating visual data in de novo PTCL patients treated in first line with standard chemotherapy and followed by both PET and computed tomography scan. Of 27 PET+3-negative patients, 19 also had a negative PET at the end of treatment (PET+6), whereas 8 of 27 had a positive final one; 6 of 7 PET+3-positive patients had a positive PET+6, whereas only 1 patient had a negative PET+6. Estimated overall survival plotted according to PET+3 results showed 78.6% for negative patients and 21.4% for positive patients at 88.7 months with a significant difference. Patients with negative PET+3 had superior progression-free survival of 72.6% compared with 16.7% of PET+3-positive patients. At the time of this analysis, 17 of 19 (89.5%) patients with negative PET+3 are in continuous complete response (CCR) and only 1 of 7 (14.2%) patients with positive PET+3 is still in CCR. In conclusion, our results indicate that positive PET+3 is predictive of a worse outcome in PTCL, and this significant statistical difference between the two curves could be clinically informative. Larger and prospective studies and harmonization of PET reading criteria are needed.
正电子发射断层扫描(PET)在外周 T 细胞淋巴瘤(PTCL)中的作用定义仍在研究中。本观察性回顾性研究的目的是评估首次 3 个周期治疗后(PET+3)的 PET 的早期预后价值,评估用标准化疗进行一线治疗并随后进行 PET 和计算机断层扫描的初治 PTCL 患者的视觉数据。在 27 例 PET+3 阴性患者中,19 例在治疗结束时(PET+6)也有阴性 PET,而 27 例中有 8 例有阳性 PET;6 例 PET+3 阳性患者有阳性 PET+6,而只有 1 例患者有阴性 PET+6。根据 PET+3 结果绘制的总生存估计显示,阴性患者的总生存率为 78.6%,阳性患者为 21.4%,88.7 个月时有显著差异。与 PET+3 阳性患者的 16.7%相比,PET+3 阴性患者的无进展生存率具有优势,为 72.6%。在本分析时,19 例 PET+3 阴性患者中有 17 例(89.5%)持续完全缓解(CCR),而 7 例 PET+3 阳性患者中仅有 1 例(14.2%)仍处于 CCR。总之,我们的结果表明,PTCL 中 PET+3 阳性提示预后不良,这两条曲线之间的显著统计学差异可能具有临床意义。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究和 PET 阅读标准的协调统一。