Fernández A, Herran I, de Mier C, Marcenac F M
Medicina (B Aires). 1989;49(4):373-8.
The activity of cefpirome (HR 810) was evaluated against 247 strains isolated from patients developing their infections while in a hospital in Buenos Aires. Its activity against Gram negative bacilli was compared with ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cephalotin, piperacillin, amikacin, gentamicin and norfloxacin. In terms of MIC50 and MIC90 (mg/l) it was as follows: Klebsiella pneumoniae: less than 0.125, less than 2.0; Pseudomonas aeruginosa: less than 8, less than 16; Escherichia coli: less than 0.016, less than 0.063; Serratia marcescens: less than 0.063, less than 1.0; Enterobacter cloacae: less than 0.125, less than 1.0. Cefpirome was more active than the other cephalosporins against P. aeruginosa: at 16 mg/l, this drug inhibited 95% of strains versus 60% for ceftazidime and 32% for ceftriaxone. Activity of norfloxacine against Gram negative bacilli was similar to cefpirome, while piperacillin and the aminoglycosides were less active. Cefpirome was more active than cepahallotin against Streptococcus faecalis (2.0, 32) although less active than ampicillin, piperacillin, rifampicin and vancomycin. Against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (less than 0.25, less than 1.0) it was more active than cephalotin and the other drugs evaluated (piperacillin, erythromycin, chloranphenicol, aminogycosides). Like cephalotin, the activity of cefpirome against methicillin-resistant strains was variable (1.0, 32).
对从布宜诺斯艾利斯一家医院感染患者中分离出的247株菌株进行了头孢匹罗(HR 810)活性评估。将其对革兰氏阴性杆菌的活性与头孢曲松、头孢他啶、头孢噻吩、哌拉西林、阿米卡星、庆大霉素和诺氟沙星进行了比较。就MIC50和MIC90(mg/l)而言,结果如下:肺炎克雷伯菌:小于0.125,小于2.0;铜绿假单胞菌:小于8,小于16;大肠埃希菌:小于0.016,小于0.063;粘质沙雷菌:小于0.063,小于1.0;阴沟肠杆菌:小于0.125,小于1.0。头孢匹罗对铜绿假单胞菌的活性比其他头孢菌素更高:在16mg/l时,该药物抑制95%的菌株,而头孢他啶为60%,头孢曲松为32%。诺氟沙星对革兰氏阴性杆菌的活性与头孢匹罗相似,而哌拉西林和氨基糖苷类活性较低。头孢匹罗对粪肠球菌的活性比头孢噻吩更高(2.0,32),尽管比氨苄西林、哌拉西林、利福平和万古霉素活性低。对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(小于0.25,小于1.0),它比头孢噻吩和其他评估药物(哌拉西林、红霉素、氯霉素、氨基糖苷类)活性更高。与头孢噻吩一样,头孢匹罗对耐甲氧西林菌株的活性不稳定(1.0,32)。