Surrey Sleep Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK ; Department of Psychology, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Surrey Sleep Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Sleep. 2014 Jun 1;37(6):1127-42. doi: 10.5665/sleep.3776.
To contrast the effects of slow wave sleep (SWS) disruption and age on daytime functioning.
Daytime functioning was contrasted in three age cohorts, across two parallel 4-night randomized groups (baseline, two nights of SWS disruption or control, recovery sleep).
Sleep research laboratory.
44 healthy young (20-30 y), 35 middle-aged (40-55 y), and 31 older (66-83 y) men and women.
Acoustic stimulation contingent on appearance of slow waves.
Cognitive performance was assessed before sleep latency tests at five daily time-points. SWS disruption resulted in less positive affect, slower or impaired information processing and sustained attention, less precise motor control, and erroneous implementation, rather than inhibition, of well-practiced actions. These performance impairments had far smaller effect sizes than the increase in daytime sleepiness and differed from baseline to the same extent for each age group. At baseline, younger participants performed better than older participants across many cognitive domains, with largest effects on executive function, response time, sustained attention, and motor control. At baseline, the young were sleepier than other age groups.
SWS has been considered a potential mediator of age-related decline in performance, although the effects of SWS disruption on daytime functioning have not been quantified across different cognitive domains nor directly compared to age-related changes in performance. The data imply that two nights of SWS disruption primarily leads to an increase in sleepiness with minor effects on other aspects of daytime functioning, which are different from the substantial effects of age.
对比慢波睡眠(SWS)中断和年龄对日间功能的影响。
在三个年龄组中对比日间功能,横跨两个平行的 4 晚随机分组(基线、SWS 中断或对照 2 晚、恢复睡眠)。
睡眠研究实验室。
44 名健康的年轻人(20-30 岁)、35 名中年人(40-55 岁)和 31 名老年人(66-83 岁)男性和女性。
出现慢波时的声刺激。
在五个每日时间点进行睡眠潜伏期测试前评估认知表现。SWS 中断导致积极情绪减少、信息处理和持续注意力减慢或受损、运动控制不精确和实施错误,而不是抑制经过良好练习的动作。这些表现受损的效应大小远小于日间嗜睡的增加,并且对每个年龄组的影响与基线相同。在基线时,年轻参与者在许多认知领域的表现优于年长参与者,对执行功能、反应时间、持续注意力和运动控制的影响最大。在基线时,年轻人比其他年龄组更困倦。
SWS 一直被认为是与年龄相关的表现下降的潜在介导物,尽管 SWS 中断对日间功能的影响尚未在不同认知领域进行量化,也未直接与表现的年龄相关性变化进行比较。数据表明,SWS 中断两晚主要导致嗜睡增加,对其他日间功能方面的影响较小,与年龄的显著影响不同。