• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国女性消费者对限制高脂肪、高糖和高盐产品在显眼位置陈列及多买促销的立法的看法:定性视角

Women Consumers' Views on Legislation to Restrict Prominent Placement and Multibuy Promotions of High Fat, Sugar, and Salt Products in England: A Qualitative Perspective.

作者信息

Dhuria Preeti, Muir Sarah, Lawrence Wendy, Roe Emma, Crozier Sarah, Cooper Cyrus, Baird Janis, Vogel Christina

机构信息

Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.

National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7597. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7597. Epub 2023 Sep 10.

DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7597
PMID:38618804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10590244/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As part of the childhood obesity strategy, the UK Government has introduced regulations to restrict the ways high fat salt and sugar (HFSS) products can be promoted in retail settings from October 2022. This study explored () consumers' views on the likely impact of the UK legislation restricting the placement and promotion of HFSS products on their shopping behaviours and () consumers' beliefs about who is responsible for healthy eating.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional study design, qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of women who shopped at a discount supermarket. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key themes.

RESULTS

Participants' (n = 34) had a median age of 35 years and over half were in paid employment. Five themes were identified: (1) The legislation is acceptable, but people can still (and should be able to) buy HFSS items; (2) The legislation is likely to have more impact on shoppers who do not plan their shopping; (3) Affordability of healthy food is just as, or more, important than the legislation; (4) It's up to the individual to eat healthily; and (5) Government and retailers can better support consumers to make healthy choices.

CONCLUSION

Most participants were optimistic about the incoming regulations and believed that it would support consumers to make healthier food choices. Many raised concerns, however, that the high price of healthy foods and continued availability of unhealthy foods within the stores could undermine the legislation's benefits. Coupling the legislation with interventions to promote and reduce the costs of healthier products would go some way to ensure its success. Raising awareness about marketing strategies that play into consumer concerns for cost and autonomy could further increase acceptance of the policy.

摘要

背景

作为儿童肥胖战略的一部分,英国政府已出台法规,自2022年10月起限制高脂肪、高盐和高糖(HFSS)产品在零售场所的促销方式。本研究探讨了()消费者对英国限制HFSS产品摆放和促销的立法可能对其购物行为产生的影响的看法,以及()消费者对健康饮食责任归属的看法。

方法

采用横断面研究设计,对在折扣超市购物的女性进行了有目的抽样的定性半结构化电话访谈。采用主题分析法确定关键主题。

结果

参与者(n = 34)的年龄中位数为35岁,半数以上有带薪工作。确定了五个主题:(1)该立法是可以接受的,但人们仍然可以(并且应该能够)购买HFSS产品;(2)该立法可能对不做购物计划的购物者产生更大影响;(3)健康食品的可承受性与立法同样重要,甚至更重要;(4)健康饮食取决于个人;(5)政府和零售商可以更好地支持消费者做出健康选择。

结论

大多数参与者对即将出台的法规持乐观态度,并认为这将支持消费者做出更健康的食品选择。然而,许多人担心健康食品价格高昂以及商店内不健康食品的持续供应可能会削弱该立法的益处。将该立法与促进和降低健康产品成本的干预措施相结合,将在一定程度上确保其成功。提高对影响消费者成本和自主权担忧的营销策略的认识,可能会进一步提高对该政策的接受度。

相似文献

1
Women Consumers' Views on Legislation to Restrict Prominent Placement and Multibuy Promotions of High Fat, Sugar, and Salt Products in England: A Qualitative Perspective.英国女性消费者对限制高脂肪、高糖和高盐产品在显眼位置陈列及多买促销的立法的看法:定性视角
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7597. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7597. Epub 2023 Sep 10.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
8
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
9
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
10
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
How distorted food prices discourage a healthy diet.扭曲的食品价格如何阻碍健康饮食。
Sci Adv. 2022 Apr;8(13):eabi8807. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi8807. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
2
Testing availability, positioning, promotions, and signage of healthier food options and purchasing behaviour within major UK supermarkets: Evaluation of 6 nonrandomised controlled intervention studies.检测英国主要超市更健康食品选择的供应情况、定位、促销和标识,以及购买行为:6 项非随机对照干预研究的评估。
PLoS Med. 2022 Mar 24;19(3):e1003952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003952. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
A critique of the English national policy from a social determinants of health perspective using a realist and problem representation approach: the 'Childhood Obesity: a plan for action' (2016, 2018, 2019).从健康决定因素的角度对英国国家政策的批判:使用现实主义和问题表述方法——“儿童肥胖:行动计划”(2016、2018、2019 年)。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 14;21(1):2284. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12364-6.
4
Altering product placement to create a healthier layout in supermarkets: Outcomes on store sales, customer purchasing, and diet in a prospective matched controlled cluster study.改变产品摆放位置以在超市营造更健康的布局:一项前瞻性匹配对照群组研究对商店销售、顾客购买和饮食的影响。
PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 7;18(9):e1003729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003729. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Public support for healthy supermarket initiatives focused on product placement: a multi-country cross-sectional analysis of the 2018 International Food Policy Study.公众对以产品布局为重点的健康超市倡议的支持:对 2018 年国际粮食政策研究的多国横断面分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jun 14;18(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01149-0.
6
Women's perceptions of factors influencing their food shopping choices and how supermarkets can support them to make healthier choices.女性对影响其食品购买选择的因素的看法,以及超市如何支持她们做出更健康的选择。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 5;21(1):1070. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11112-0.
7
A systematic review of the influences of food store product placement on dietary-related outcomes.食品商店产品陈列对饮食相关结果影响的系统评价。
Nutr Rev. 2020 Dec 1;78(12):1030-1045. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa024.
8
Social justice, human rights and health equity.社会正义、人权与健康公平。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Sep 22;43(3):e423-e424. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa010.
9
Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour.初级保健研究中的半结构化访谈:关系与严谨性的平衡。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 8;7(2):e000057. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000057. eCollection 2019.
10
Protocol of a natural experiment to evaluate a supermarket intervention to improve food purchasing and dietary behaviours of women (WRAPPED study) in England: a prospective matched controlled cluster design.评估英格兰一家超市干预措施对改善女性食品购买和饮食行为的自然实验方案(WRAPPED 研究):前瞻性匹配对照聚类设计。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 10;10(2):e036758. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036758.