文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Cochrane系统评价更新中的研究流程图:一种改编的PRISMA流程图。

Study flow diagrams in Cochrane systematic review updates: an adapted PRISMA flow diagram.

作者信息

Stovold Elizabeth, Beecher Deirdre, Foxlee Ruth, Noel-Storr Anna

机构信息

Cochrane Airways Group, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London SW19 2HG, UK.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2014 May 29;3:54. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-54.


DOI:10.1186/2046-4053-3-54
PMID:24886533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4046496/
Abstract

Cochrane systematic reviews are conducted and reported according to rigorous standards. A study flow diagram must be included in a new review, and there is clear guidance from the PRISMA statement on how to do this. However, for a review update, there is currently no guidance on how study flow diagrams should be presented. To address this, a working group was formed to find a solution and produce guidance on how to use these diagrams in review updates.A number of different options were devised for how these flow diagrams could be used in review updates, and also in cases where multiple searches for a review or review update have been conducted. These options were circulated to the Cochrane information specialist community for consultation and feedback. Following the consultation period, the working group refined the guidance and made the recommendation that for review updates an adapted PRISMA flow diagram should be used, which includes an additional box with the number of previously included studies feeding into the total. Where multiple searches have been conducted, the results should be added together and treated as one set of results.There is no existing guidance for using study flow diagrams in review updates. Our adapted diagram is a simple and pragmatic solution for showing the flow of studies in review updates.

摘要

Cochrane系统评价是按照严格的标准进行实施和报告的。新的评价必须包含研究流程图,并且PRISMA声明对如何制作该图有明确的指导。然而,对于评价更新,目前尚无关于应如何呈现研究流程图的指导。为解决这一问题,成立了一个工作组来寻找解决方案,并就如何在评价更新中使用这些图制定指导意见。针对如何在评价更新中使用这些流程图,以及在对一项评价或评价更新进行多次检索的情况下,设计了多种不同的选项。这些选项已分发给Cochrane信息专家群体以征求意见和反馈。在征求意见期之后,工作组完善了指导意见,并建议在评价更新中应使用经过调整的PRISMA流程图,该图应包括一个额外的方框,其中列出纳入总数中的既往纳入研究数量。如果进行了多次检索,应将结果相加并视为一组结果。目前尚无关于在评价更新中使用研究流程图的指导意见。我们调整后的图是展示评价更新中研究流程的一种简单而实用的解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c036/4046496/5b4e72491b7c/2046-4053-3-54-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c036/4046496/5b4e72491b7c/2046-4053-3-54-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c036/4046496/5b4e72491b7c/2046-4053-3-54-1.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Study flow diagrams in Cochrane systematic review updates: an adapted PRISMA flow diagram.

Syst Rev. 2014-5-29

[2]
Tailored PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams for living systematic reviews: a methodological survey and a proposal.

F1000Res. 2021

[3]
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.

Early Hum Dev. 2020-11

[4]
I-REFF diagrams: enhancing transparency in systematic review through interactive reference flow diagrams.

Syst Rev. 2024-1-17

[5]
: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis.

Campbell Syst Rev. 2022-3-27

[6]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

Int J Surg. 2021-4

[7]
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 6: PRISMA-CI extension statement and checklist.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2017-10

[8]
Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials.

JAMA. 2001-4-18

[9]
Survey of instructions for authors on how to report an update of a systematic review: guidance is needed.

Evid Based Med. 2017-4

[10]
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Ann Intern Med. 2009-8-18

引用本文的文献

[1]
Musculoskeletal disorders among computer user workers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sci Rep. 2025-7-24

[2]
The economic burden of malaria in Africa: a systematic review of cost of illness studies.

Malar J. 2025-7-9

[3]
Prevalence and its associated factors of medical error reporting among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PLoS One. 2025-6-2

[4]
Epidemiology of Traumatic brain injury in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, mechanisms, and outcomes.

PLoS One. 2025-5-30

[5]
Limited Evidence to Fully Determine the Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice by Healthcare Providers in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

J Evid Based Med. 2025-6

[6]
Post-traumatic stress disorder and associated factors among road traffic accident survivors in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PLoS One. 2025-2-24

[7]
Tai Chi improves balance, mobility and gait function of the lower limbs in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur J Med Res. 2025-2-17

[8]
Prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis and associated factors among adults living with HIV/AIDS in Ethiopia, systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Infect Dis. 2025-1-9

[9]
Childhood Asthma in Saudi Arabia: Insights from a Meta-Analysis on Its Prevalence.

Children (Basel). 2024-12-20

[10]
Technical efficiency of public hospitals in east Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025-1-6

本文引用的文献

[1]
A multicomponent decision tool for prioritising the updating of systematic reviews.

BMJ. 2013-12-13

[2]
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

PLoS Med. 2009-7-21

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索